Oscillatory phase shapes syllable perception

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 52, 2015, Pages 15833-15837

  Ten Oever, Sanne ^a   Sack, Alexander T ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXCITABILITY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOUTH; OSCILLATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SOUND; SPEECH; THETA RHYTHM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTOR; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84952685626     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517519112     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Campbell R (2008) The processing of audio-visual speech: Empirical and neural bases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363(1493):1001-1010.
2. Schwartz J-L, Savariaux C (2014) No, there is no 150 ms lead of visual speech on auditory speech, but a range of audiovisual asynchronies varying from small audio lead to large audio lag. PLoS Comput Biol 10(7):e1003743.
3. Chandrasekaran C, Trubanova A, Stillittano S, Caplier A, Ghazanfar AA (2009) The natural statistics of audiovisual speech. PLoS Comput Biol 5(7):e1000436.
4. Ten Oever S, Sack AT, Wheat KL, Bien N, Van Atteveldt N (2013) Audio-visual onset differences are used to determine syllable identity for ambiguous audio-visual stimulus pairs. Front Psychol 4:331.
5. Schroeder CE, Lakatos P, Kajikawa Y, Partan S, Puce A (2008) Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech. Trends Cogn Sci 12(3):106-113.
6. Peelle JE, Sommers MS (2015) Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception. Cortex 68:169-181.
7. Luo H, Liu Z, Poeppel D (2010) Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biol 8(8):e1000445.
8. Van Atteveldt N, Murray MM, Thut G, Schroeder CE (2014) Multisensory integration: Flexible use of general operations. Neuron 81(6):1240-1253.
9. Perrodin C, Kayser C, Logothetis NK, Petkov CI (2015) Natural asynchronies in audiovisual communication signals regulate neuronal multisensory interactions in voicesensitive cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(1):273-278.
10. Mercier MR, et al. (2015) Neuro-oscillatory phase alignment drives speeded multisensory response times: An electro-corticographic investigation. J Neurosci 35(22):8546-8557.
11. Besle J, et al. (2011) Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events. J Neurosci 31(9):3176-3185.
12. Lakatos P, Chen CM, O'Connell MN, Mills A, Schroeder CE (2007) Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex. Neuron 53(2):279-292.
13. Kayser C, Ince RA, Panzeri S (2012) Analysis of slow (theta) oscillations as a potential temporal reference frame for information coding in sensory cortices. PLoS Comput Biol 8(10):e1002717.
14. Peelle JE, Davis MH (2012) Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Front Psychol 3:320.
15. Zoefel B, Heil P (2013) Detection of near-threshold sounds is independent of EEG phase in common frequency bands. Front Psychol 4:262.
16. De Graaf TA, et al. (2013) Alpha-band rhythms in visual task performance: Phaselocking by rhythmic sensory stimulation. PLoS One 8(3):e60035.
17. Lakatos P, Karmos G, Mehta AD, Ulbert I, Schroeder CE (2008) Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science 320(5872):110-113.
18. Henry MJ, Obleser J (2012) Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(49):20095-20100.
19. Fiebelkorn IC, et al. (2011) Ready, set, reset: Stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset. J Neurosci 31(27):9971-9981.
20. Summerfield C, Egner T (2009) Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 13(9):403-409.
21. Fiser J, Aslin RN (2001) Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychol Sci 12(6):499-504.
22. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
23. Schroeder CE, Lakatos P (2009) Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci 32(1):9-18.
24. Fujisaki W, Shimojo S, Kashino M, Nishida S (2004) Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nat Neurosci 7(7):773-778.
25. Kösem A, Gramfort A, Van Wassenhove V (2014) Encoding of event timing in the phase of neural oscillations. Neuroimage 92:274-284.
26. Jensen O, Gips B, Bergmann TO, Bonnefond M (2014) Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing. Trends Neurosci 37(7):357-369.
27. Mathewson KE, Fabiani M, Gratton G, Beck DM, Lleras A (2010) Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a momentary release from visual masking with pre-target entrainment. Cognition 115(1):186-191.
28. Watrous AJ, Fell J, Ekstrom AD, Axmacher N (2015) More than spikes: Common oscillatory mechanisms for content specific neural representations during perception and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 31:33-39.
29. Fell J, Axmacher N (2011) The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(2):105-118.
30. Kayser C, Montemurro MA, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2009) Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns. Neuron 61(4):597-608.
31. Chakravarthi R, Vanrullen R (2012) Conscious updating is a rhythmic process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(26):10599-10604.
32. Boersma P, Weenink D (2013) Praat: Doing Phonectics by Computer (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam), Version 5.3.56.
33. Bertelson P, Vroomen J, De Gelder B (2003) Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychol Sci 14(6):592-597.
34. Zychaluk K, Foster DH (2009) Model-free estimation of the psychometric function. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(6):1414-1425.
35. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M (2011) FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:156869.
36. Berens P (2009) CircStat: A MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics. J Stat Softw 31(10):1-21.
37. Gómez-Herrero G, et al. (2006) Automatic removal of ocular artifacts in the EEG without an EOG reference channel. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium (IEEE, Rejkjavik), pp 130-133.
38. Zar JH (1998) Biostatistical Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 4th Ed.
39. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 29(4):1165-1188.
40. Mewhort DJ, Kelly M, Johns BT (2009) Randomization tests and the unequal-N/unequalvariance problem. Behav Res Methods 41(3):664-667.
41. Hari R, Hämäläinen M, Joutsiniemi SL (1989) Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 86(3):1033-1039.
42. Rees A, Green GG, Kay RH (1986) Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res 23(2):123-133.
43. Lakatos P, et al. (2013) The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron 77(4):750-761.