Experiences from selecting a BPM notation for an enterprise

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 228, Issue , 2015, Pages 126-138

  Sandkuhl, Kurt ^a,b   Wiebring, Jörn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^b ITMO UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Business process modelling; Experience report; Process modelling notations

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SURVEYS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; EXPERIENCE REPORT; ISSUES AND CHALLENGES; MEDIUM SIZED ENTERPRISE; PROCESS MODELLING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84952658986     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Aguilar-Savén, R.S.: Business process modelling: Review and framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90 (2), 129–149 (2004)
2. Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D., Räckers, M.: Domain specific process modelling in public administrations – the PICTURE-approach. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
3. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: Unified Modeling Language (UML), version, 1. Rational Software Corporation, Santa Clara (1998)
4. Bortz, J., Döring, N.: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation – Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
5. Bundesnetzagentur: Geschäftsprozesse zur Kundenbelieferung mit Elektrizität, GPKE. Konsolidierte Fassung ab, 1 April 2012. https://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/id/BBDE5740233A837FC1257830004D9AC0/$file/Konsolidierte_Lesefassung_GPKE.pdf Accessed 20 Nov 2014
6. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Mäesalu, R., Reijers, H.A., Semenenko, N.: Understanding business process models: the costs and benefits of structuredness. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 31–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
7. Figl, K., Laue, R.: Cognitive complexity in business process modeling. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 452–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
8. Kalpic, B., Bernus, P.: Business process modelling in industry—the powerful tool in enterprise management. Comput. Ind. 47(3), 299–318 (2002)
9. Knuth, D.E.: Computer-drawn flowcharts. Commun. ACM 6(9), 555–563 (1963)
10. Krogstie, J.: Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, London New York (2012)
11. Melcher, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Seese, D.: On measuring the understandability of process models. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 465–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
12. Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Influence factors of understanding business process models. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds.) Business Information Systems. LNBIP, vol. 7, pp. 142–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
13. Mikula, S.: Qualität von Geschäftsprozessnotationen. Diploma thesis, Rostock University, September 2011
14. Ottensooser, A., Fekete, A., Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Menictas, C.: Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations. J. Syst. Softw. 85(3), 596–606 (2012)
15. Parsons, J., Cole, L.: What do pictures mean? guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(2005), 327–342 (2005)
16. Recker, J. Dreiling, A.: Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? an experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Australia, 5– 7 December 2007, Toowoomba (2007)
17. Reisig, W.: A Primer in Petri Net Design. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
18. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). ISBN 978-3662437247
19. Scheer, A.-W., Nüttgens, M.: ARIS architecture and reference models for business process management. In: Aalst, W.M., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 376–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
20. Schrepfer, M., Wolf, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: The impact of secondary notation on process model understanding. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 161–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
21. Smith, H., Fingar, P.: Business Process Management: The Third Wave, 1st edn. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2003)
22. Van der Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30 (4), 245–275 (2005)
23. White, S.A.: Introduction to BPMN. Business Process Trends, July 2004. www.bptrends.com