Use of the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: Human health risk assessment of the use of a pyrethroid in bed netting

Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 54-73

  Doe, John E ^a   Lander, Deborah R ^b   Doerrer, Nancy G ^c   Heard, Nina ^d   Hines, Ronald N ^e   Lowit, Anna B ^e   Pastoor, Timothy ^d   Phillips, Richard D ^f   Sargent, Dana ^g   Sherman, James H ^h   Tanir, Jennifer Young ^c   Embry, Michelle R ^c  

^a Parker Doe Partnership LLP   (United Kingdom)

^b DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^c ILSI HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION   (United States)

^e U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^f EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^g ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE CORPORATION   (United States)

^h MONSANTO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Integrated testing strategy; pyrethroid; risk assessment; tiered approach

Indexed keywords

CYHALOTHRIN; DELTAMETHRIN; PYRETHROID; SODIUM CHANNEL;

ARTICLE; BED NET; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; CONVULSION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EXPOSURE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LIVER TOXICITY; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MALARIA CONTROL; NEUROTOXICITY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN ABSORPTION; TREMOR; VAPOR PRESSURE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; GOVERNMENT; INSECTICIDE TREATED NET; TOXICITY TESTING; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMANS; INSECTICIDE-TREATED BEDNETS; MODELS, ANIMAL; PYRETHRINS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TESTS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

EID: 84952638530     PISSN: 10408444     EISSN: 15476898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2015.1082974     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barlow S, Sullivan F, Lines J. Risk assessment of the use of deltalmethrin on bednets for the prevention of malaria. Food Chem Toxicol 2001; 39: 407-422.
2. Bitsch A, Jacobi S, Melber C, Wahnschaffe U, Simetska N, Mangelsdorf I. REPDOSE: a database on repeated dose toxicity studies of commercial chemicals-a multifunctional tool. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006; 46: 202-210.
3. California EPA. (2000). Deltamethrin risk characterization. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Health Assessment Section, Medical Toxicology Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation.
4. Dorne JL, Renwick AG. The refinement of uncertainty/safety factors in risk assessment by the incorporation of data on toxicokinetic variability in humans. Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 20-26.
5. Embry M, Bachman A, Bell D, Boobis A, Cohen S, Dellarco M, Dewhurst I, et al. Risk assessment in the 21st century (RISK21): roadmap and matrix. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014; 44 Suppl 3: 6-16.
6. EPA. (2011). Pyrethrins/pyrethroid cumulative risk assessment. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs. 4 October 2011. EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0746-0003.
7. FAO. (1993). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 185 for fenpropathin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
8. FAO. (1996). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides data sheet 83 for resmethrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
9. FAO. (1999). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 331 for permethrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
10. FAO. (2002a). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 204 for esfenvalerate. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
11. FAO. (2002b). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 743 for prallethrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
12. FAO. (2003a). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 385 for cyfluthrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
13. FAO. (2003b). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 463 for lambda cyhalothrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
14. FAO. (2005). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 750 for s-bioallethrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
15. FAO. (2006). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 118 for cypermethrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
16. FAO. (2010). WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides evaluation report 415 for bifenthrin. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
17. Hughes MF, Edwards BC. In vitro dermal absorption of pyrethroid pesticides in human and rat skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010; 246: 29-37.
18. Leahy D. Integrating in vitro ADMET data through generic physiologically based pharmacokinetic models. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2006; 2: 619-628.
19. Losa S, Johnstone A, Shafer T. Relative potencies of type I and type II pyrethroids for inhibition of spontaneous firing in neuronal networks. Abstract # 2126. Toxicologist 2009; 108.
20. OECD. Guidance on grouping of chemicals. Environment health and safety publications No 80 ENV/JM/MONO(2007)28. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2007.
21. Pastoor T, Bachman A, Bell D, Cohen S, Dellarco M, Dewhurst I, Doe J, et al. A 21st century roadmap for human health risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014; 44 Suppl 3: 1-5.
22. Soderlund D, Clark J, Sheets L, Mullin L, Piccirillo V, Sargent D, Stevens J, Weiner M. Mechanisms of pyrethroid toxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology 2002; 171: 3-59.
23. Thomas RS, Philbert MA, Auerbach SS, Wetmore BA, Devito MJ, Cote I, Rowlands JC, et al. Incorporating new technologies into toxicity testing and risk assessment: moving from 21st century vision to a data-driven framework. Toxicol Sci 2013; 136: 4-18.
24. Wakeling EN, Neal AP, Atchison WD. (2012). Pyrethroids and their effects on ion channels. In: Soundararajan RP., editor. Pesticides-advances in chemical and botanical pesticides. InTech. ISBN: 978-953-51-0680-7. DOI: 10.5772/50330. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/pesticides-advances-in-chemical-and-botanical-pesticides/pyrethroids-and-their-effects-on-ion-channels [accessed 20 June 2015].
25. WHO. (2004). A generic risk assessment model for insecticide treatment and subsequent use of mosquito n ets. WHO Publication WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2004.6 WHO/PCS/04.1. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
26. Wolansky M, Gennings C, Crofton K. Relative potencies for acute effects of pyrethroids on motor function in rats. Toxicol Sci 2006; 89: 271-277.
27. Wolf DC, Bachman A, Barrett G, Bellin C, Goodman JI, Jensen E, Moretto A., et al. Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water. Crit Rev Toxicol. Submitted for publication.