FMRI and anesthesia

International Anesthesiology Clinics

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 129-142

  Tang, Cheuk Ying ^a   Ramani, Ramachandran ^b  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ETHER DERIVATIVE; ISOFLURANE; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; VISION; ANIMAL; BRAIN; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES;

ANESTHESIA; ANESTHETICS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HUMANS; ISOFLURANE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METHYL ETHERS; PROPOFOL;

EID: 84952360923     PISSN: 00205907     EISSN: 15371913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000081     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Raichle ME. The restless brain. Brain Connect. 2011;1:3-12.
2. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9868-9872.
3. Hu X, Yacoub E. The story of the initial dip in fMRI. Neuroimage. 2012;62: 1103-1108.
4. Buxton RB. Dynamic models of BOLD contrast. Neuroimage. 2012;62:953-961.
5. Buxton RB, Uludag K, Dubowitz DJ, et al. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage. 2004;23(suppl 1):S220-S233.
6. Friston KJ, Mechelli A, Turner R, et al. Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the Balloon model, Volterra kernels, and other hemodynamics. Neuroimage. 2000;12:466-477.
7. Rosen BR, Buckner RL, Dale AM. Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:773-780.
8. SPM. Statistical Parametric Mapping. Available at: http://wwwfilionuclacuk/spm/.
9. FSL. FMRIB Software Library. Available at: http://fslfmriboxacuk/fsl/fslwiki/.
10. AFNI. Analysis of Functional NeuroImages. Available at: http://afninimhnihgov/afni/.
11. Friston KJ, Holmes A, Poline JB, et al. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. Neuroimage. 1996;4(pt 1):223-235.
12. Brammer MJ, Bullmore ET, Simmons A, et al. Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15:763-770.
13. MacDonald AA, Naci L, MacDonald PA, et al. Anesthesia and neuroimaging: investigating the neural correlates of unconsciousness. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015;19: 100-107.
14. Rampil IJ, Mason P, Singh H. Anesthetic potency (MAC) is independent of forebrain structures in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:707-712.
15. Antognini JF, Buonocore MH, Disbrow EA, et al. Isoflurane anesthesia blunts cerebral responses to noxious and innocuous stimuli: a fMRI study. Life Sci. 1997;61:PL 349-PL 354.
16. Burton H, Videen TO, Raichle ME. Tactile-vibration-activated foci in insular and parietal-opercular cortex studied with positron emission tomography: mapping the second somatosensory area in humans. Somatosens Mot Res. 1993;10:297-308.
17. Mhuircheartaigh RN, Rosenorn-Lanng D, Wise R, et al. Cortical and subcortical connectivity changes during decreasing levels of consciousness in humans: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using propofol. J Neurosci. 2010;30: 9095-9102.
18. Heinke W, Fiebach CJ, Schwarzbauer C, et al. Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:641-650.
19. Friederici AD. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:78-84.
20. Plourde G, Belin P, Chartrand D, et al. Cortical processing of complex auditory stimuli during alterations of consciousness with the general anesthetic propofol. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:448-457.
21. Adapa RM, Davis MH, Stamatakis EA, et al. Neural correlates of successful semantic processing during propofol sedation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:2935-2949.
22. Davis MH, Coleman MR, Absalom AR, et al. Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104: 16032-16037.
23. Kerssens C, Hamann S, Peltier S, et al. Attenuated brain response to auditory word stimulation with sevoflurane: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:11-19.
24. Martin E, Thiel T, Joeri P, et al. Effect of pentobarbital on visual processing in man. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10:132-139.
25. Heinke W, Schwarzbauer C. Subanesthetic isoflurane affects task-induced brain activation in a highly specific manner: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:973-981.
26. Krause BJ, Schmidt D, Mottaghy FM, et al. Episodic retrieval activates the precuneus irrespective of the imagery content of word pair associates. A PET study. Brain. 1999;122(pt 2):255-263.
27. Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N. The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron. 1999;23:747-764.
28. Ramani R, Qiu M, Constable RT. Sevoflurane 0.25 MAC preferentially affects higher order association areas: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:648-655.