The anthropology of family business: An imagined ideal

The Sage Handbook of Family Business

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 66-82

  Stewart, Alex ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952326181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446247556.n4     Document Type: Chapter

References (152)

1. Adler, P.A. and Adler, P. (1987). Membership Roles in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Adler, P.A. and Adler, P. (2008). Of rhetoric and representation: The four faces of ethnography. Sociological Quarterly, 49, 1-30. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00104.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00104.x
3. Aldrich, H.E. and Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026%2803%2900011-9
4. Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 151-174. doi:10.1257/jep.21.4.151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.151
5. Armstrong, R.P. (1971). The Affecting Presence: An Essay in Humanistic Anthropology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
6. Arnould, E.J., Price, L., and Moisio, R. (2007). Making contexts matter: Selecting research contexts for theoretical insights. In R.W.Belk (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing (pp. 106-128). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
7. Aunger, R. (2004). Reflexive Ethnographic Science. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira.
8. Barth, F. (1967). Economic spheres in Darfur. In R.Firth (ed.), Themes in Economic Anthropology (pp. 149-174). London: Tavistock.
9. Barth, F. (1999). Comparative methodologies in the analysis of anthropological data. In J.R.Bowen and R.Peterson (eds), Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture (pp.78-89). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Blim, M.L. (1990). Made in Italy: Small-scale Industrialization and its Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
11. Bloch, M. (1971). The moral and tactical meaning of kinship terms. Man (N.S.), 6, 79-87.
12. Bloch, M. (1973). The long term and the short term: The economic and political significance of the morality of kinship. In J.Goody (ed.), The Character of Kinship (pp. 75-87). London: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bloch, M. and Sperber, D. (2002). Kinship and evolved psychological dispositions. Current Anthropology, 43, 723-748. doi:10.1086/341654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/341654
14. Brettell, C.B. (2002). Gendered lives: Transitions and turning points in personal, family, and historical time. Current Anthropology, 43(Supplement), S45-S61. doi:10.1086/339565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339565
15. Briggs, C.L. (2007). Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society. Current Anthropology, 48, 551-580. doi:10.1086/518300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/518300
16. Brinberg, D. and McGrath, J.E. (1985). Validity and the Research Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Brown, P.H., Bulte, E., and Zhang, X. (2011). Positional spending and status seeking in rural China. Journal of Development Economics, 96, 139-149. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.007
18. Bruun, O. (1993). Business and Bureaucracy in a Chinese City: An Ethnography of Private Business Households in Contemporary China. Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
19. Buessow, J. (2011). Street politics in Damascus: Kinship and other social categories as bases of political action, 1830-1841. The History of the Family, 16(2), 108-125. doi:10.1016/j.hisfam.2011.02.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2011.02.004
20. Campbell, D.T. (1975). Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 178-193.
21. Carsten, J. (2000). Introduction: Cultures of relatedness. In J.Carsten (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness (pp. 1-36). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Chagnon, N.A. (1968). Yanomamo: The Fierce People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
23. Cohen, R. (1977). Comment on 'Standardization and measurement in cultural anthropology: A neglected area'. Current Anthropology, 18, 235-258. doi:10.1086/201887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/201887
24. Colli, A., Fernández Pérez, P., and Rose, M.B. (2003). National determinants of family firm development? Family firms in Britain, Spain, and Italy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Enterprise and Society, 4, 28-64. doi:10.1093/es/4.1.28 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/es/4.1.28
25. Collier, J. Jr. and Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
26. Coy, M.W. (1989). Being what we pretend to be: The usefulness of apprenticeship as a field method. In M.W.Coy (ed.), Apprenticeship (pp. 115-135). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27. Creed, G.W. (2000). 'Family values' and domestic economies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 329-355. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.329
28. Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative research. Theory into Practice, 39, 124-130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
29. Dalton, M. (1959). Men Who Manage: Fusions of Feeling and Theory in Administration. New York: Wiley.
30. Daly, K. and Dienhart, A. (1998). Navigating the family domain: Qualitative field dilemmas. In S.Grills (ed.), Doing Ethnographic Research: Fieldwork Settings (pp. 97-120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Davidoff, L. and Hall, C. (1987). Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780-1850. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. de Lima, A.P. (2000). Is Blood thicker than Economic Interest in Familial Enterprises? In P.P.Schweitzer (ed.), Dividends of kinship: Meanings and uses of social relatedness (pp. 151-176). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203449752_chapter_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203449752_chapter_6
33. Ember, C.R. and Ember, M. (2009). Cross-cultural Research Methods, 2nd edn.Lanham, MD: Alta Mira.
34. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., and Shaw, L.L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
35. Eriksen, T.H. (2006). Engaging Anthropology: The Case for a Public Presence. New York: Berg.
36. Farrell, B. (1993). Elite Families: Class and Power in Nineteenth Century Boston. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37. Feinberg, R. (2001). Introduction: Schneider's cultural analysis of kinship and its implications for anthropological relativism. In R.Feinberg and M.Ottenheimer (eds), The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David M. Schneider (pp. 1-31). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
38. Feldman, M.S., Bell, J., and Berger, M.T. (eds) (2003). Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
39. Fortes, M. (1949). The Web of Kinship among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.
40. Fox, R. (1983). Kinship and Marriage: An Anthropological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Friese, S. (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS. ti. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C.Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
43. Geertz, C. (1974). 'From the native's point of view': On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28, 26-45. doi:10.2307/3822971 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3822971
44. Godelier, M. (2011 [2004]). Métamorphoses de la parenté. Paris: Fayard. Translated (2011) as The Metamorphoses of Kinship (N.Scott, Trans.), London: Versa.
45. Goldthorpe, J.H. (2000). On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Good, A. (1996). Kinship. In A.Barnard and J.Spencer (eds), Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology (pp. 311-318). London: Routledge.
47. Goody, J. (1969). Inheritance, property, and marriage in Africa and Eurasia. Sociology, 3, 55-76. doi:10.1177/003803856900300104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003803856900300104
48. Goody, J. (1976). Production and Reproduction: A Comparative study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Goody, J. (1996). The East in the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139171052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171052
50. Gordon, G. and Nicholson, N. (2008). Family Wars: Classic Conflicts in Family Business and How to Deal With Them. London: Kogan Page.
51. Gravlee, C.C., Kennedy, D.P., Godoy, R., and Leonard, W.R. (2009). Methods for collecting panel data: What anthropology can learn from other disciplines. Journal of Anthropological Research, 65, 463-483.
52. Greenhalgh, S. (1994). Deorientalizing the Chinese family firm. American Ethnologist, 21, 746-775. doi:10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a00050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a00050
53. Hamabata, M.M. (1990). Crested Kimono: Power and Love in the Japanese Business Family. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
54. Hann, C. (2005). A new double movement? Anthropological perspectives on property in the age of neoliberalism. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 287-318. doi:10.1093/ser/mwl027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl027
55. Hann, C. (2008). Reproduction and inheritance: Goody revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 145-158. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085222
56. Harper, D. (1987). Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Harrell, S. (1997). Human Families. Boulder, CO: Westview.
58. Hart, K. (1975). Swindler or public benefactor?-The entrepreneur in his community. In J.Goody (ed.), Changing Social Structure in Ghana (pp. 1-35). London: International African Institute.
59. Hegelund, A. (2005). Objectivity and subjectivity in the ethnographic method. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 647-668. doi:10.1177/1049732304273933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732304273933
60. Heider, E.R. (1972). Probabilities, sampling, and ethnographic method: The case of Dani colour names. Man (N.S.), 7, 448-466.
61. Helin, J. (2011). Living moments in family meetings: A process study in the family business context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Jönköping International Business School.
62. Hodson, R. (1998). Organizational ethnographies: An underutilized resource in the sociology of work. Social Forces, 76, 1173-1208.
63. Hollos, M. and Larsen, U. (2004). Which African men promote smaller families and why? Marital relations and fertility in a Pare community in Northern Tanzania. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1733-1749. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00365-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536%2803%2900365-4
64. Holy, L. (1996). Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London: Pluto.
65. Hunt, S.D. (2003). Controversy in Marketing Theory: For Reason, Realism, Truth, and Objectivity. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
66. Jackson, J.L. Jr. (2004). An ethnographic film flam: Giving gifts, doing research, and videotaping the native subject/object. American Anthropologist, 106, 32-42. doi:10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.32
67. Jacobs-Huey, L. (2002). The natives are gazing and talking back: Reviewing the problematics of positionality, voice, and accountability among 'native' anthropologists. American Anthropologist, 104, 791-804. doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.791
68. Johannisson, B. (2002). Energising entrepreneurship: Ideological tensions in the medium-sized family business. In D.Fletcher (ed.), Understanding the Small Family Business (pp. 46-57). London: Routledge.
69. Johnson, A. and Johnson, O.R. (1990). Quality into quantity: The measurement potential of fieldnotes. In R.Sanjek (ed.), Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology (pp. 161-186). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
70. Jones, A.M. (2006). Culture, identity, and motivation: The historical anthropology of a family firm. Culture and Organization, 12, 169-183. doi:10.1080/14759550600683054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759550600683054
71. Jordan, A.T. (2010). The importance of business anthropology: Its unique contribution. International Journal of Business Anthropology, 1, 7-17.
72. Kasdan, L. (1965). Family structure, migration and the entrepreneur. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 7, 345-357. doi:10.1017/S0010417500003765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500003765
73. Keesing, R.M. (ed.) (1978). Elota's Story: The Life and Times of a Solomon Islands Big Man. New York: St Martin's Press.
74. Kondo, D.K. (1990). Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75. Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: The Anthropologists' Account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76. Kuper, A. (2009). Incest and Influence: The Private Life of Bourgeois England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Lam, W. (2011). Dancing to two tunes: Multi-entity roles in the family business succession process. International Small Business Journal, 29, 508-533. doi:10.1177/0266242610376357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242610376357
78. Lambek, M. (2011). Kinship as gift and theft: Acts of succession in Mayotte and ancient [sic] Israel. American Ethnologist, 38, 2-16. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01288.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01288.x
79. Leach, E.R. (1961). Pul Eliya: A Village in Ceylon: A Study of Land Tenure and Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Learned, K.E. (1995). The creation of firm resources: A native ethnography. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
81. Lett, J. (1997). Science, Reason, and Anthropology: The Principles of Rational Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
82. Locke, K. (2011a). Field research practice in management and organization studies: Reclaiming its tradition of discovery. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 613-652. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.593319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.593319
83. Locke, K. (2011b). Looking for what we have a case of. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 6, 88-92.
84. Lomnitz, L.A. and Pérez-Lizaur, M. (1987). A Mexican Elite Family, 1820-1980: Kinship, Class and Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85. Malkki, L.H. (2007). Tradition and improvisation in ethnographic field research. In A.Cerwonka and L.H.Malkki (eds), Improvising Theory: Process and Temporality in Ethnographic Fieldwork (pp. 162-187). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226100289.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226100289.001.0001
86. Marcus, G.E. and Hall, P.D. (1992). Lives in Trust: The Fortunes of Dynastic Families in Late Twentieth Century America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
87. McDonough, G.W. (1986). Good Families of Barcelona: A Social History of Power in the Industrial Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
88. Meisch, L.A. (2002). Andean Entrepreneurs: Otavalo Merchants and Musicians in the Global Arena. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
89. Mills, C.W. (2000 [1959]). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
90. Moffatt, M. (1992). Ethnographic writing about American culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 205-229. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.001225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.001225
91. Morrill, C. and Fine, G.A. (1997). Ethnographic contributions to organizational sociology. Sociological Methods and Research, 25, 424-451. doi:10.1177/0049124197025004003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124197025004003
92. Mosse, D. (2006). Anti-social anthropology: Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 12, 935-956. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00371.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00371.x
93. Mulligan, T.M. (1987). The two cultures in business education. Academy of Management Review, 12, 593-599.
94. Nordqvist, M., Hall, A., and Melin, L. (2009). Qualitative research on family businesses: The relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 15, 294-308. doi:10.5172/jmo.2009.15.3.294 http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2009.15.3.294
95. Ortner, S.B. (1996). Making Gender: The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
96. Oxfeld, E. (1993). Blood, Sweat, and Mahjong: Family and Enterprise in an Overseas Chinese Community. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
97. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.
98. Patterson, M. (2005). Introduction: Reclaiming paradigms lost. Australian Journal of Anthropology, 16, 1-17. doi:10.1111/j.1835-9310.2005.tb00106.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2005.tb00106.x
99. Peletz, M.G. (1995). Kinship studies in late twentieth century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 343-372. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002015
100. Pine, F. (1996). Family. In A.Barnard and J.Spencer (eds), Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology (pp. 223-228). London: Routledge.
101. Ragin, C.C. (1992). Cases of 'what is a case?' In C.C.Ragin and H.S.Becker (eds), What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (pp. 1-17). New York: Cambridge University Press.
102. Ram, M. (1994). Managing to Survive: Working Lives in Small Firms. Oxford: Blackwell.
103. Richards, A.I. (1950). Some types of Family Structure among the central Bantu. In A.R.Radcliffe-Brown and D.Forde (eds.), African systems of Kinship and Marriage (pp. 207-251). London: Oxford University Press.
104. Robertson, A.F. (1991). Beyond the Family: The Social Organization of Human Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
105. Rosa, P. and Caulkins, D.D. (2013). Entrepreneurship studies. In D.D.Caulkins and A.T.Jordan (eds), A Companion to Organizational Anthropology (pp. 98-121). New York: Wiley.
106. Rutherford, D. (2010). Kinship, capital, and the unsettling of assumptions: Contemporary anthropology and the study of family enterprise and entrepreneurship. In A.Stewart, G.T.Lumpkin, and J.A.Katz (eds), Entrepreneurship and Family Business (pp. 277-283). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1074-7540(2010)0000012012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540%282010%290000012012
107. Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2006). Testing an ethnographic decision tree model on a national sample: Recycling beverage cans. Human Organization, 65, 103-114.
108. Sangren, P.S. (2009). 'Masculine domination', desire and Chinese patriliny. Critique of Anthropology, 29, 255-278. doi:10.1177/0308275X09104082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09104082
109. Sanjek, R. (1990a). The secret life of fieldnotes. In R.Sanjek (ed.), Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology (pp. 187-270). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
110. Sanjek, R. (1990b). On ethnographic validity. In R.Sanjek (ed.), Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology (pp. 385-418). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
111. Scandura, T.A. and Williams, E.A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1248-1264. doi:10.2307/1556348 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556348
112. Scheffler, H.W. (2001). Filiation and Affiliation. Boulder, CO: Westview.
113. Scheffler, H.W. (2010). Kinship and gender. In A.Stewart, G.T.Lumpkin, and J.A.Katz (eds), Entrepreneurship and Family Business (pp. 285-290). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1074-7540(2010)0000012013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540%282010%290000012013
114. Schneider, D.M. (1995). Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories as told to Richard Handler. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
115. Segalen, M. (1986). Historical Anthropology of the Family. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511621864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621864
116. Shapiro, W. (1997). Marriage systems. In T.Barfield (ed.), The Dictionary of Anthropology (pp. 304-307). Oxford: Blackwell.
117. Shimizu, A. (1991). On the notion of kinship. Man (N.S.), 26, 377-403.
118. Song, M. (1999). Helping out: Children's Labor in Ethnic Businesses. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
119. Spradley, J.P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
120. Stafford, C. (2000). Chinese patriliny and the cycles of yang and laiwang. In J.Carsten (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness (pp. 37-54). New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Stebbins, R.A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
122. Stewart, A. (1990). The bigman metaphor for entrepreneurship: A 'library tale' with morals on alternatives for further research. Organization Science, 1, 143-159. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.143
123. Stewart, A. (1998). The Ethnographer's Method. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
124. Stewart, A. (2003). Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27(4), 383-396. doi:10.1111/1540-8520.00016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00016
125. Stewart, A. (2008). Who could best complement a team of family business researchers, scholars down the hall or in another building? Family Business Review, 21, 279-293.
126. Stewart, A. (2010). Sources of entrepreneurial discretion in kinship systems. In A.Stewart, G.T.Lumpkin, and J.A.Katz (eds), Entrepreneurship and Family Business (pp. 291-313). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1074-7540(2010)0000012014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540%282010%290000012014
127. Stewart, A. and Hitt, M.A. (2012). Why can't a family business be more like a non-family business: Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86. doi:10.1177/0894486511421665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894486511421665
128. Stewart, A. and Miner, A.S. (2011). The prospects for family business in research universities. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.005
129. Stockard, J.E. (2002). Marriage in Culture: Practice and Meaning Across Diverse Societies. New York: Wadsworth.
130. Stone, L. (2010). Kinship and Gender, 4th edn.Boulder, CO: Westview.
131. Sunderland, P.L. and Denny, R.M. (2007). Doing Anthropology in Consumer Research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
132. Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
133. Urban, G. (1999). The role of comparison in the light of the theory of culture. In J.R.Bowen and R.Peterson (eds), Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture (pp. 90-109). New York: Cambridge University Press.
134. Van Maanen, J. (1975). Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 207-220. doi:10.2307/2391695 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391695
135. Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226849638.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226849638.001.0001
136. Van Vleet, K.E. (2008). Performing Kinship: Narrative, Gender, and the Intimacies of Power in the Andes. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
137. Viazzo, P.P. and Lynch, K.A. (2002). Anthropology, family history, and the concept of strategy. International Review of Social History, 47, 423-452. doi:10.1017/S002085900200072X http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002085900200072X
138. Wagner, J. (1979). The humanistic perspective in anthropology: A brief overview. In B.T.Grindal and D.M.Warren (eds), Essays in Humanistic Anthropology: A Festschrift for David Bidney (pp. 3-12). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
139. Wallman, S. (1975). Kinship, a-kinship, anti-kinship: Variations in the logic of kinship situations. Journal of Human Evolution, 4, 331-341. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(75)90016-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484%2875%2990016-0
140. Watson, R.S. (1985). Inequality Among Brothers: Class and Kinship in South China. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557583
141. Weick, K.E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
142. Werner, O. (1998). Do we need standards for ethnography? Field Methods, 10(1), 1-3. doi:10.1177/1525822X980100010301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X980100010301
143. Werner, O. and Bernard, H.R. (1994). Ethnographic sampling. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 6(7), 7-9.
144. White, D.R. and Johansen, U.C. (2006). Network Analysis and Ethnographic Problems: Process Models of a Turkish Nomadic Clan. New York: Lexington.
145. White, D.R. and Jorion, P. (1996). Kinship networks and discrete structure theory: Applications and implications. Social Networks, 18, 267-314. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(95)00277-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733%2895%2900277-4
146. Wigren, C. (2007). Assessing the quality of qualitative research in entrepreneurship. In H.Neergaard and J.P.Ulhøi (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship (pp. 383-405). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
147. Wolcott, H.F. (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
148. Wong S.-L. (1988). Emigrant Entrepreneurs: Shanghai Industrialists in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
149. Yan, Y. (2001). Practicing kinship in rural north China. In S.Franklin and S.McKinnon (eds), Relative Values: Refiguring Kinship Studies (pp. 224-245). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
150. Yanagisako, S.J. (1978). Variance in American kinship: Implications for cultural analysis. American Ethnologist, 5, 15-29. doi:10.1525/ae.1978.5.1.02a00030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.1978.5.1.02a00030
151. Yanagisako, S.J. (1979). Family and household: The analysis of domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8, 161-205. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.001113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.001113
152. Yanagisako, S.J. (2002). Producing Culture and Capital: Family Firms in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.