Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 821-830

  Kim, Katherine K ^a   Joseph, Jill G ^a   Ohno Machado, Lucila ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Consent; Distributed research network; Health information exchange; Patient centered; Privacy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANONYMISED DATA; ARTICLE; CALIFORNIA; CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIVACY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CALIFORNIA; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLIC OPINION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84952319910     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, eds. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Pre-publication copy ed: Institute of Medicine Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America; 2012.
2. Lauer MS, D'Agostino RB. The Randomized Registry Trial - The Next Disruptive Technology in Clinical Research? N Engl J Med. 2013;369(17): 1579-1581.
3. 111th Congress of the United State of America. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, 2009.
4. Collins FS, Hudson KL, Briggs JP, Lauer MS. PCORnet: turning a dream into reality. JAMIA. 2014;21(4):576-577.
5. Consortium PP, Daugherty SE, Wahba S, Fleurence R. Patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research. JAMIA. 2014;21(4):583-586.
6. Holmes JH, Elliott TE, Brown JS, et al. Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature. JAMIA. 2014;21(4):730-736.
7. Brown J, Holmes J, Maro J, et al. Design specifications for network prototype and cooperative to conduct population-based studies and safety surveillance. No. 13. (Prepared by the DEcIDE Centers at the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics and the University of Pennsylvania Under Contract No. HHSA29020050033I T05.). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
8. Ohno-Machado L, Alipanah N, Day M, et al. Clinical Data Research Networks, Patient Registries and Patient Powered Research Networks, Taxonomy and Comprehensive Inventories. Technical Report. June 12, 2013 ed. Washington DC: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2013.
9. Brown JS, Holmes JH, Shah K, Hall K, Lazarus R, Platt R. Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care. Med Care. 2010;48(6):S45-S51.
10. Ohno-Machado L, Agha Z, Bell DS, et al. pSCANNER: patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research. JAMIA. 2014;21(4): 621-626.
11. eHealthInitiative. 2012 Report on Health Information Exchange: Supporting Healthcare Reform. Secondary 2012 Report on Health Information Exchange: Supporting Healthcare Reform 2012. http://www.ehidc.org/resource-center/surveys/view_document/43-survey-2012-annual-hie-surveyresults-report-on-health-information-exchange-supporting-healthcare-reform-data-exchange Accessed October 1, 2013.
12. CaleConnect. Enabling Exchange: An Assessment of Community and Enterprise Health Information Organizations in California. 2012. http://www .ohii.ca.gov/calohi/downloadfile.aspx?id=571 Accessed December 22, 2014.
13. California Health and Human Services Agency. Report to the Legislature: Demonstration Project Specific to Patient Consent for Health Information Exchange. 2014. http://www.ohii.ca.gov/calohi/downloadfile.aspx?id= 581 Accessed December 22, 2014.
14. Medical Research Council. The use of personal health information in medical research: general public consultation. Secondary The use of personal health information in medical research: General public consultation 2007. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Archive/Polls/mrc.pdf Accessed October 13, 2013.
15. Robling MR, Hood K, Houston H, Pill R, Fay J, Evans HM. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(1):104-109.
16. Whiddett R, Hunter I, Engelbrecht J, Handy J. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(7):530-541.
17. Weitzman ER, Kaci L, Mandl KD. Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12( 2):e14.
18. Willison DJ, Schwartz L, Abelson J, et al. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 200714(6): 706-712.
19. Willison DJ, Keshavjee K, Nair K, Goldsmith C, Holbrook AM. Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. BMJ. 2003;326(7385):373
20. Mamo LA, Browe DK, Logan H, Kim KK. Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium. Washington, DC; 2013. 920-929.
21. Willison DJ, Steeves V, Charles C, et al. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions? BMC Med Ethics. 2009;10(1):10.
22. Perera G, Holbrook A, Thabane L, Foster G, Willison DJ. Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(2):94-101.
23. Ancker JS, Silver M, Miller MC, Kaushal R. Consumer experience with and attitudes toward health information technology: a nationwide survey. JAMIA. 2013;20(1):152-156.
24. Agaku IT, Adisa AO, Ayo-Yusuf OA, Connolly GN. Concern about security and privacy, and perceived control over collection and use of health information are related to withholding of health information from healthcare providers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014;21 (2), 374-378.
25. Kim KK, Browe DK, Logan HC, Holm R, Hack L, Ohno-Machado L. Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders. JAMIA 2013;21(4):714-719.
26. National Partnership for Women & Families. Making IT Meaningful: How Consumers Value and Trust Health IT. Washington DC: National Partnership for Women & Families; 2012:32-33.
27. Fox S, Rainie L. The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Secondary The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves 2000. http://www.pewinternet.org/_/media//Files/Reports/2000/PIP_Health_Report.pdf Accessed September 1, 2013.
28. Westin AF. Public attitudes toward electronic health records. AHIP Cover. 2005;46(4):22-25.
29. Weitzman E, Kelemen S, Kaci L, Mandl K. Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12(1):39.
30. Wen K-Y, Kreps G, Zhu F, Miller S. Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey. J Med Internet Res. e73.
31. Teixeira PA, Gordon P, Camhi E, Bakken S. HIV patients' willingness to share personal health information electronically. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 84(2): e9-e12.
32. Agaku IT, Adisa AO, Ayo-Yusuf OA, Connolly GN. Concern about security and privacy, and perceived control over collection and use of health information are related to withholding of health information from healthcare providers. JAMIA. 2014;21(2):374-378.
33. Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN. On the theory of sampling from finite populations. Ann Math Stat. 1943;14(4):333-362.
34. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Nadarajasundaram G, Davern ME, Boudreaux MH. Wireless Substitution: State-level Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 2010-2011. Secondary Wireless Substitution: State-level Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 2010-2011. 2012.
35. Horrigan J. The Mobile Difference: Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2009. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/5-The-Mobile-Different-Typology.aspx.
36. Fox S. The Social Life of Health Information Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2011. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-of-Health-Info.aspx.
37. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th edn. AAPOR; 2011, Deerfield, IL.
38. California Healthcare Foundation. Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey. Secondary Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey 2010. http://www.chcf.org/_/media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/C/PDF%20ConsumersHealthInfo TechnologyNationalSurvey.pdf Accessed September 1, 2013.
39. McGraw D. Building public trust in uses of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act de-identified data. JAMIA. 2012;20(1): 29-34.
40. Grande D, Mitra N, Shah A, Wan F, Asch DA. Public Preferences About Secondary Uses of Electronic Health Information. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(19):1798-1806.
41. Rogith D, Yusuf RA, Hovick SR, et al. Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy. JAMIA. 2014;21(e2): e320-e325.
42. Shoenbill K, Fost N, Tachinardi U, Mendonca EA. Genetic data and electronic health records: a discussion of ethical, logistical and technological considerations. JAMIA. 2014;21(1):171-180.
43. Goldstein MM, Rein AL. 'Consumer consent options for electronic health information exchange: policy considerations and analysis', Prepared for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT. Washington, DC: George Washington University Medical Center, 2010.
44. Ancker JS, Edwards AM, Miller MC, Kaushal R. Consumer perceptions of electronic health information exchange. Am J Prev Med., 2012; 43(1): 76-80.
45. Hripcsak G, Bloomrosen M, FlatelyBrennan P, et al. Health data use, stewardship, and governance: ongoing gaps and challenges: a report from AMIA's 2012 Health Policy Meeting. JAMIA. 2014;21(2):204-211.
46. Kim KK, Browe DK, Logan HC, Holm R, Hack L, Ohno-Machado L. Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014; 21(4).
47. Selby JV, Krumholz HM, Kuntz RE, Collins FS. Network news: powering clinical research. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(182):182fs13.