Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: A systematic review of the literature

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 730-736

  Holmes, John H ^a   Elliott, Thomas E ^b   Brown, Jeffrey S ^c   Raebel, Marsha A ^d   Davidson, Arthur ^e   Nelson, Andrew F ^f   Chung, Annie ^a   La Chance, Pierre ^g   Steiner, John F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^e DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY   (United States)

^f Institute for Research and Education   (United States)

^g CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA BASE; EMBASE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA GOVERNANCE; DATA PRIVACY; DATA WAREHOUSE; RESEARCH NETWORKS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; DATABASES AS TOPIC; PRIVACY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84902383705     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002370     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Toh S, Platt R, Steiner JF, et al. Comparative-effectiveness research in distributed health data networks. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;90:883-7.
2. Patel AA, Gilbertson JR, Showe LC, et al. A novel cross-disciplinary multi-institute approach to translational cancer research: lessons learned from Pennsylvania Cancer Alliance Bioinformatics Consortium (PCABC). Cancer Inform 2007;3:255-74.
3. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G, et al. Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. JNCI Monographs 2005;2005:3-11.
4. Curtis LH, Weiner MG, Boudreau DM, et al. Design considerations, architecture, and use of the Mini-Sentinel distributed data system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21(Suppl 1):23-31.
5. Forrow S, Campion DM, Herrinton LJ, et al. The organizational structure and governing principles of the Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel pilot program. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21(Suppl 1):12-17.
6. McGraw D, Rosati K, Evans B. A policy framework for public health uses of electronic health data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21:18-22.
7. McMurry AJ, Gilbert CA, Reis BY, et al. A self-scaling, distributed information architecture for public health, research, and clinical care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:527-33.
8. Platt R, Davis R, Finkelstein J, et al. Multicenter epidemiologic and health services research on therapeutics in the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001;10:373-7.
9. Velentgas P, Bohn RL, Brown JS, et al. A distributed research network model for post-marketing safety studies: the Meningococcal Vaccine Study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008;17:1226-34.
10. Rosenbaum S. Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access. Health Serv Res 2010;45(5 Pt 2):1442-55.
11. Brown JS, Holmes JH, Shah K, et al. Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care. Med Care 2010;48(6 Suppl):S45-51.
12. Maro JC, Platt R, Holmes JH, et al. Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:341-4.
13. Fernandes L, O'Connor M. Data governance and data stewardship. Critical issues in the move toward EHRs and HIE. J AHIMA 2009;80:36-9.
14. McGarvey PB, Ladwa S, Oberti M, et al. Informatics and data quality at collaborative multicenter Breast and Colon Cancer Family Registries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19(e1):e125-8.
15. Fullerton SM, Lee SS. Secondary uses and the governance of de-identified data: lessons from the human genome diversity panel. BMC Med Ethics 2011;12:16.
16. Shapiro M, Silva SG, Compton S, et al. The Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Trials Network (CAPTN): infrastructure development and lessons learned. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2009;3:12.
17. Manion FJ, Robbins RJ, Weems WA, et al. Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:31.
18. Randhawa GS, Slutsky JR. Building sustainable multi-functional prospective electronic clinical data systems. Med Care 2012;50(Suppl):S3-6.
19. Standards & Interoperability (S&I) framework-Query Health. Office of the National Coordinator 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 3]. http://wiki.siframework.org/Query+Health.
20. Office of the National Coordinator. Standards and Interoperability Framework-Query Health. Standards and Interoperability (S&I) Framework 2013 [cited 2013 Aug 1]. http://wiki.siframework.org/Query+Health.
21. Go AS, Magid DJ, Wells B, et al. The Cardiovascular Research Network. Circulation 2008;1:138-47.
22. Lazarus R, Yih K, Platt R. Distributed data processing for public health surveillance. BMC Public Health 2006;6:235.
23. Magid DJ, Gurwitz JH, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Creating a research data network for cardiovascular disease: the CVRN. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2008;6:1043-5.
24. Parwani A, Singh H, Dzubinski L, et al. Design and utilization of the colorectal and pancreatic neoplasm virtual biorepository: an early detection research network initiative. J Pathol Inform 2010;1:22.
25. Baggs J, Gee J, Lewis E, et al. The Vaccine Safety Datalink: a model for monitoring immunization safety. Pediatrics 2011;127(Supplement 1):S45-53.
26. Bailey H, Agger W, Baumgardner D, et al. The Wisconsin Network for Health Research (WiNHR): a statewide, collaborative, multi-disciplinary, research group. WMJ 2009;108:453-8.
27. Tucci DL, Schulz K, Witsell DL. Building a national research network for clinical investigations in otology and neurotology. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:190-5.
28. Brown J, McDonald S, Moore K, et al. PS1-20: VDW Operational Committee: current activities and future directions. Clin Med Res 2010;8:61-2.
29. Bloomrosen M, Detmer D. Advancing the framework: use of health data-a report of a working conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:715-22.
30. Gardner J, Xiong L, Xiao Y, et al. SHARE: system design and case studies for statistical health information release. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:109-16.
31. Braff J. PS1-03: expanding the functional scope of institutional review board review of multi-site research in the HMO Research Network: from data-only studies, to non-clinical interventions, to clinical trials. Clin Med Res 2011;9:175-6.
32. Bredfeldt CE, Butani A, Padmanabhan S, et al. Managing protected health information in distributed research network environments: automated review to facilitate collaboration. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:39.
33. McMurry AJ, Murphy SN, MacFadden D, et al. SHRINE: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e55811.
34. Wu Y, Jiang X, Kim J, et al. Grid Binary LOgistic REgression (GLORE): building shared models without sharing data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:758-64.
35. Ohno-Machado L, Bafna V, Boxwala AA, et al. iDASH: integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:196-201.
36. Kim K, McGraw D, Mamo L, et al. Development of a privacy and security policy framework for a multistate comparative effectiveness research network. Med Care 2013;51:S66-72.
37. Willison DJ. Trends in collection, use and disclosure of personal information in contemporary health research: challenges for research governance. Health Law Rev 2005;13:107-13.
38. Godwin D, Mahajan B, Silcott M, et al. C-A1-04: Challenges faced as new members of the HMO Research Network virtual data warehouse. Clin Med Res 2011;9:184.
39. Thompson EE, Greene SM, Larson EB. PS1-15: What has the HMO Research Network done for you, lately? How the network is responding to investigators' needs. Clin Med Res 2010;8:46.
40. Research Toolkit. Better Tools for Multi-site Research 2013 [cited 2013 Aug 15]. http://www.researchtoolkit.org.
41. Lopez MH, Holve E, Sarkar IN, et al. Building the informatics infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER): a review of the literature. Med Care 2012;50(Suppl):S38-48.
42. Holve E, Segal C, Hamilton LM. Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with electronic clinical data: a perspective from the EDM forum. Med Care 2012;50(Suppl):S11-18.
43. Ohno-Machado L, Alipanah N, Day M, et al. Clinical Data and Patient Research Networks, Patient Registries and Patient Powered Research Networks, Taxonomy and Comprehensive Inventories. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 2013.
44. Greene S, Thompson E, Baldwin LM, et al. PS1-29: Resources to facilitate multi-site collaboration: the PRIMER research toolkit. Clin Med Res 2010;8:207.
45. Scalable PArtnering Network for Comparative Effectiveness Research (SPAN). Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research 2013 [cited 2013 Aug 1]. http://www.span-network.org/.
46. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, et al. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine, 2012.