Predictive validity of a frailty measure (GFI) and a case complexity measure (IM-E-SA) on healthcare costs in an elderly population

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 404-411

  Peters, Lilian L ^a   Burgerhof, Johannes G M ^a   Boter, Han ^a   Wild, Beate ^b   Buskens, Erik ^a   Slaets, Joris P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Case complexity; Curative care costs; Frailty; Healthcare costs; Long term care costs; Predictive validity

Indexed keywords

AGED; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LONG TERM CARE; MODEL; MORBIDITY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; ECONOMICS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; LIFESTYLE; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LONG-TERM CARE; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84951922366     PISSN: 00223999     EISSN: 18791360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Mathers C.D., Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006, 3(11).
2. van Oostrom S.H., Picavet H.S., van Gelder B.M., et al. Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the Dutch population-data from general practices. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 2011, 155:A3193.
3. Bergman H., Ferrucci L., Guralnik J., et al. Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm - issues and controversies. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2007, 62(7):731-737.
4. Denton F.T., Spencer B.G. Chronic health conditions: changing prevalence in an aging population and some implications for the delivery of health care services. Can. J. Aging 2010, 29(1):11-21.
5. Carone G. Long-term labour force projections for the 25 EU member states: a set of data for assessing the economic impact of ageing. Eur. Econ. 2005, 235:43.
6. European Commission Commission Staff Working Document on an Action Plan for the EU Health Workforce. Accompanying the Document: Communication From the Commission of the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2012, 93. SWD, final: 5-6.
7. Steverink N., Slaets J., Schuurmans H., Van Lis M. Measuring frailty: developing and testing the GFI (Groningen Frailty Indicator). Gerontologist 2001, 41(special issue I):236-237.
8. Schuurmans H., Steverink N., Lindenberg S., et al. Old or frail: what tells us more?. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2004, 59(9):962-965.
9. Slaets J.P. Vulnerability in the elderly: frailty. Med. Clin. North Am. 2006, 90(4):593-601.
10. Peters L.L., Boter H., Buskens E., Slaets J.P. Measurement properties of the Groningen frailty indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2012, 13(6):546-551.
11. Ferrucci L. An exciting thought. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2005, 60(1):56.
12. Rockwood K., Stadnyk K., MacKnight C., et al. A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. Lancet 1999, 353(9148):205-206.
13. Fulop T., Larbi A., Witkowski J.M., et al. Aging, frailty and age-related diseases. Biogerontology 2010, 11(5):547-563.
14. Metzelthin S.F., Daniels R., van Rossum E., et al. The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:176-184.
15. Daniels R., van Rossum E., Beurskens A., et al. The predictive validity of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health 2012, 12(1):69.
16. Jansen J.C., Abma E.M., Hegeman J.H., et al. Kwetsbaarheid als indicator voor herstel na een fractuur. Ned. Tijdschr. Traumatol. 2011, 3:51-57.
17. Aaldriks A.A., Maartense E., le Cessie S., et al. Predictive value of geriatric assessment for patients older than 70years, treated with chemotherapy. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2010, 79:205-212.
18. Biesma B., Wymenga A.N., Vincent A., et al. Quality of life, geriatric assessment and survival in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with carboplatin-gemcitabine or carboplatin-paclitaxel: NVALT-3 a phase III study. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22:1520-1527.
19. Pol R.A., van Leeuwen B.L., Visser L., et al. Standardised frailty indicator as predictor for postoperative delirium after vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011, 42(6):824-830.
20. Aaldriks A.A., Giltay E.J., le Cessie S., et al. Prognostic value of geriatric assessment in older patients with advanced breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Breast 2013.
21. Wild B., Lechner S., Herzog W., et al. Reliable integrative assessment of health care needs in elderly persons: the INTERMED for the elderly (IM-E). J. Psychosom. Res. 2011, 70(2):169-178.
22. Peters L.L., Boter H., Slaets J.P., Buskens E. Development and measurement properties of the self assessment version of the INTERMED for the elderly to assess case complexity. J. Psychosom. Res. 2013, 74(6):518-522.
23. de Jonge P., Huyse F.J., Stiefel F.C., et al. INTERMED-a clinical instrument for biopsychosocial assessment. Psychosomatics 2001, 42(2):106-109.
24. Huyse F.J., Lyons J.S., Stiefel F., et al. Operationalizing the biopsychosocial model: the intermed. Psychosomatics 2001, 42(1):5-13.
25. Spoorenberg S.L., Uittenbroek R.J., Middel B., et al. Embrace, a model for integrated elderly care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness regarding patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care. BMC Geriatr. 2013, 13. 62-2318-13-62.
26. Eissens Laan van der M.R., van Offenbeek M.A., Broekhuis H., Slaets J.P. A person-centred segmentation study in elderly care: towards efficient demand-driven care. Soc Sci Med. 2014, 113:68-76.
27. Peters L.L., Boter H., Burgerhof J.G., et al. Construct validity of the Groningen frailty indicator established in a large sample of home-dwelling elderly persons: evidence of stability across age and gender. Exp. Gerontol. 2015, 69:129-141.
28. Huyse F.J., Lyons J.S., Stiefel F.C., et al. "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. I. Development and reliability. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1999, 21(1):39-48.
29. Stiefel F.C., de Jonge P., Huyse F.J., et al. "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. II. Results on its validity and clinical use. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 1999, 21(1):49-56.
30. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports Health insurance in The Netherlands March 2011.
31. Rolden H., Waal van der M. Coordination of healthcare services in The Netherlands. A report by Leyden Academy on vitality and ageing 2012, 7-21.
32. Myers R. Classical and Modern Regression With Applications. Vol Boston, MA: Duxbury 1990, second ed.
33. Royston P., Moons K.G., Altman D.G., Vergouwe Y. Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 2009, 338:b604.
34. Miller M.E., Langefeld C.D., Tierney W.M., et al. Validation of probabilistic predictions. Med. Decis. Mak. 1993, 13(1):49-58.
35. Vergouwe Y., Steyerberg E.W., Eijkemans M.J., Habbema J.D. Validity of prognostic models: when is a model clinically useful?. Semin. Urol. Oncol. 2002, 20(2):96-107.
36. Wild B., Heider D., Maatouk I., et al. Significance and costs of complex biopsychosocial health care needs in elderly people: results of a population-based study. Psychosom. Med. 2014.
37. Hoogendijk E.O., van der Horst H.E., Deeg D.J., et al. The identification of frail older adults in primary care: comparing the accuracy of five simple instruments. Age Ageing 2013, 42(2):262-265.
38. Clegg A., Rogers L., Young J. Diagnostic test accuracy of simple instruments for identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2015, 44(1):148-152.
39. Wou F., Gladman J.R., Bradshaw L., et al. The predictive properties of frailty-rating scales in the acute medical unit. Age Ageing 2013, 42(6):776-781.
40. Pijpers E., Ferreira I., Stehouwer C.D., Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman A.C. The frailty dilemma. Review of the predictive accuracy of major frailty scores. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 23(2):118-123.
41. Bakx P., Schut E., Doorslaer van E. Can Risk Adjustment Prevent Risk Selection in a Competitive Longterm Care Insurance Market 2013, Erasmus University Rotterdam (The Netherlands), Institute of Health Policy & Management.
42. de Klerk M. Care in the Last Years. Health and Care use in Residential Homes and Nursing Homes 2002-2008 November 2011, Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau, The Hague.
43. Caljouw M.A., Cools H.J., Gussekloo J. Natural course of care dependency in residents of long-term care facilities: prospective follow-up study. BMC Geriatr. 2014, 14. 67-2318-14-67.
44. Statistics Netherlands. Accessed 09/01, 2015. http://www.cbs.nl.
45. Bonsang E. Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe?. J. Health Econ. 2009, 28(1):143-154.
46. Bakx P., de Meijer C., Schut F., van Doorslaer E. Going formal or informal, who cares? The influence of public long-term care insurance. Health Econ. 2014.
47. Royston P., Altman D.G., Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat. Med. 2006, 25(1):127-141.