Authorship identification of Romanian texts with controversial paternity

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 3392-3397

  Dinu, Liviu P ^a   Popescu, Marius ^a   Dinu, Anca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHORSHIP IDENTIFICATION; FUNCTION WORDS; LEARNING METHODS; ROMANIANS; STRING KERNEL;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84951869903     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Carole E. Chaski. 1996. Linguistic methods of determining authorship. In National Institute of Justice Research Seminar. 49th American Academy of Forensic Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN.
2. Cindy K. Chung and James W. Pennebaker. 2007. The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedler, editor, Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology, pages 343-359. Psychology Press, New York.
3. P. Diaconis and R. L. Graham. 1977. Spearman's footrule as a measure of disarray. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 39(2):262-268.
4. Anca Dinu and Liviu Petrisor Dinu. 2005. On the syllabic similarities of romance languages. In CICLing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 785-788.
5. Liviu Petrisor Dinu and Marius Popescu. to appear. A multi-criteria decision method based on rank distance. Fundamenta Informaticae.
6. Liviu Petrisor Dinu and Andrea Sgarro. 2006. A lowcomplexity distance for dna strings. Fundamenta Informaticae, 73(3):361-372.
7. Liviu Petrisor Dinu. 2003. On the classification and aggregation of hierarchies with different constitutive elements. Fundamenta Informaticae, 55(1):39-50.
8. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. 2001. Pattern Classification (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience Publication.
9. David I. Holmes, Lesley J. Gordon, and Christine Wilson. 2001. A widow and her soldier: Stylometry and the american civil war. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16(4):403-420.
10. Cyril Labbé and Dominique Labbé. 2006. A tool for literary studies: Intertextual distance and tree classification. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 21(3):311-326.
11. Kim Luyckx, Walter Daelemans, and Edward Vanhoutte. 2006. Stylogenetics: Clustering-based stylistic analysis of literary corpora. In Proceedings of LREC-2006, the fifth International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 30-35.
12. Solomon Marcus. 1989. Inventie si descoperire. Ed. Cartea Romaneasca, Bucuresti.
13. Marius Popescu and Liviu P. Dinu. 2007. Kernel methods and string kernels for authorship identification: The federalist papers case. In Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP - 2007 (Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing), Borovets, Bulgaria, September.
14. Marius Popescu and Liviu P. Dinu. forthcoming. Rank distance as a stylistic similarity.
15. Conrad Sanderson and Simon Guenter. 2006. Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, markov chains and author unmasking: An investigation. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 482-491, Sydney, Australia, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. John S. Taylor and Nello Cristianini. 2004. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
17. Hans van Halteren, M. Haverkort, H. Baayen, A. Neijt, and F. Tweedie. 2005. New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12:65-77.