Abnormal inhibition-excitation imbalance in migraine

Cephalalgia

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 5-14

  Nguyen, Bao N ^a   McKendrick, Allison M ^a   Vingrys, Algis J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

electrophysiology; excitation; Inhibition; migraine; supersaturation; vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL HYPERRESPONSIVITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EXCITATORY INHIBITORY IMBALANCE; HUMAN; MIGRAINE AURA; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; MONOTONICITY INDEX; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STEADY STATE; VISUAL CORTEX; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; FEMALE; INHIBITORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; MALE; MIGRAINE WITH AURA; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; MALE; MIGRAINE WITH AURA; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84951824867     PISSN: 03331024     EISSN: 14682982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0333102415576725     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Albrecht DG, Hamilton DB,. Striate cortex of monkey and cat: Contrast response function. J Neurophysiol 1982; 48: 217-237.
2. Heeger DJ,. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 1992; 9: 181-197.
3. Carandini M, Heeger DJ,. Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. Science 1994; 264: 1333-1336.
4. Peirce JW,. The potential importance of saturating and supersaturating contrast response functions in visual cortex. J Vis 2007; 7: 1-10.
5. Ledgeway T, Zhan C, Johnson AP, et al. The direction-selective contrast response of area 18 neurons is different for first- and second-order motion. Vis Neurosci 2005; 22: 87-99.
6. Vialatte FB, Maurice M, Dauwels J, et al. Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives. Prog Neurobiol 2010; 90: 418-438.
7. Angelucci A, Bressloff PC,. Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. Prog Brain Res 2006; 154: 93-120.
8. Schwabe L, Ichida JM, Shushruth S, et al. Contrast-dependence of surround suppression in macaque V1. Experimental testing of a recurrent network model. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 777-792.
9. Spekreijse H, van der Twell LH, Zuidema T,. Contrast evoked responses in man. Vision Res 1973; 13: 1577-1601.
10. Ross J, Speed HD,. Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1991; 246: 61-69.
11. Tyler CW, Apkarian PA,. Effects of contrast, orientation and binocularity in the pattern evoked potential. Vision Res 1985; 25: 755-766.
12. Vecchia D, Pietrobon D,. Migraine: A disorder of brain excitatory-inhibitory balance? Trends Neurosci 2012; 35: 507-520.
13. Battista J, Badcock DR, McKendrick AM,. Migraine increases centre-surround suppression for drifting visual stimuli. PLoS One 2011; 6: e18211-e18211.
14. Battista J, Badcock DR, McKendrick AM,. Center-surround visual motion processing in migraine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6070-6076.
15. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Gilroy LA, et al. Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature 2003; 424: 312-315.
16. Chubb C, Sperling G, Solomon JA,. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86: 9631-9635.
17. Aurora SK, Wilkinson F,. The brain is hyperexcitable in migraine. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 1442-1453.
18. Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J,. Is the cerebral cortex hyperexcitable or hyperresponsive in migraine? Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 1427-1439.
19. Brigo F, Storti M, Tezzon F, et al. Primary visual cortex excitability in migraine: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2013; 34: 819-830.
20. Battelli L, Black KR, Wray SH,. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual area V5 in migraine. Neurology 2002; 58: 1066-1069.
21. Vincent M, Pedra E, Mourao-Miranda J, et al. Enhanced interictal responsiveness of the migraineous visual cortex to incongruent bar stimulation: A functional MRI visual activation study. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 860-868.
22. Antal A, Polania R, Saller K, et al. Differential activation of the middle-temporal complex to visual stimulation in migraineurs. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 338-345.
23. Nguyen BN, McKendrick AM, Vingrys AJ,. Simultaneous retinal and cortical visually evoked electrophysiological responses in between migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 896-907.
24. Nguyen BN, Vingrys AJ, McKendrick AM,. The effect of duration post-migraine on visual electrophysiology and visual field performance in people with migraine. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 42-57.
25. International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders (3rd edition). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629-808.
26. Sand T, Zhitniy N, White LR, et al. Visual evoked potential latency, amplitude and habituation in migraine: A longitudinal study. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 1020-1027.
27. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Sawyer J, et al. Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache 2001; 41: 854-861.
28. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 2010; 120: 111-119.
29. Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Aprile T, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28: 323-334.
30. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR,. Motion processing deficits in migraine. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 363-372.
31. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Badcock JC, et al. Motion perception in migraineurs: Abnormalities are not related to attention. Cephalalgia 2006; 26: 1131-1136.
32. Shepherd AJ,. Local and global motion after-effects are both enhanced in migraine, and the underlying mechanisms differ across cortical areas. Brain 2006; 129: 1833-1843.
33. Hood DC, Zhang X,. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: Comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 115-137.
34. Ishikawa K, Nagai T, Yamada Y, et al. Optimal conditions for multifocal VEP recording for normal Japanese population established by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 2011; 122: 29-37.
35. Marcus DA, Soso MJ,. Migraine and stripe-induced visual discomfort. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 1129-1132.
36. Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J,. Habituation and migraine. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009; 92: 249-259.
37. Meigen T, Bach M,. On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 1999; 98: 207-232.
38. Priebe NJ, Ferster D,. Mechanisms of neuronal computation in mammalian visual cortex. Neuron 2012; 75: 194-208.
39. Tsai JJ, Norcia AM, Ales JM, et al. Contrast gain control abnormalities in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2011; 70: 574-582.
40. Porciatti V, Bonanni P, Fiorentini A, et al. Lack of cortical contrast gain control in human photosensitive epilepsy. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 259-263.
41. Coppola G, Parisi V, Di Lorenzo C, et al. Lateral inhibition in visual cortex of migraine patients between attacks. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 20-31.
42. Zemon V, Ratliff F,. Visual evoked potentials: Evidence for lateral interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982; 79: 5723-5726.
43. Ambrosini A, de Noordhout AM, Sandor PS, et al. Electrophysiological studies in migraine: A comprehensive review of their interest and limitations. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 13-31.
44. Shepherd AJ,. Visual contrast processing in migraine. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 865-880.
45. Karanovic O, Thabet M, Wilson HR, et al. Detection and discrimination of flicker contrast in migraine. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 723-736.
46. Thabet M, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR, et al. The locus of flicker adaptation in the migraine visual system: A dichoptic study. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 5-19.
47. Judit A, Sandor PS, Schoenen J,. Habituation of visual and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials tends to normalize just before and during the migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 714-719.
48. Vikelis M, Mitsikostas DD,. The role of glutamate and its receptors in migraine. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2007; 6: 251-257.
49. Puppe A, Limmroth V,. GABAergic drugs for the treatment of migraine. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2007; 6: 247-250.
50. Panconesi A,. Serotonin and migraine: A reconsideration of the central theory. J Headache Pain 2008; 9: 267-276.
51. Granziera C, DaSilva AF, Snyder J, et al. Anatomical alterations of the visual motion processing network in migraine with and without aura. PLoS Med 2006; 3: e402-e402.
52. Fierro B, Ricci R, Piazza A, et al. 1 Hz rTMS enhances extrastriate cortex activity in migraine: Evidence of a reduced inhibition? Neurology 2003; 61: 1446-1448.
53. Creutzfeldt OD, Sakmann B, Scheich H, et al. Sensitivity distribution and spatial summation within receptive-field center of retinal on-center ganglion cells and transfer function of the retina. J Neurophysiol 1970; 33: 654-671.
54. Kaplan E, Purpura K, Shapley RM,. Contrast affects the transmission of visual information through the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol 1987; 391: 267-288.
55. Allison JD, Melzer P, Ding Y, et al. Differential contributions of magnocellular and parvocellular pathways to the contrast response of neurons in bush baby primary visual cortex (V1). Vis Neurosci 2000; 17: 71-76.
56. Truchard AM, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD,. Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: Monocular versus binocular mechanisms. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 3017-3032.
57. Dakin S, Carlin P, Hemsley D,. Weak suppression of visual context in chronic schizophrenia. Curr Biol 2005; 15: R822-R824.
58. Golomb JD, McDavitt JR, Ruf BM, et al. Enhanced visual motion perception in major depressive disorder. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 9072-9077.
59. Karas R, McKendrick AM,. Aging alters surround modulation of perceived contrast. J Vis 2009; 9: 1-9.