Logical design patterns for information system development problems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9381, Issue , 2015, Pages 134-147

  Maaß, Wolfgang ^a   Storey, Veda C ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstractions; Design rules; Design science; Design theory; Logical design patterns; Prescriptive and descriptive design knowledge; Software engineering

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; DATA MINING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LOGIC DESIGN; PRODUCT DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ABSTRACTIONS; DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN RULES; DESIGN SCIENCE; DESIGN THEORY; LOGICAL DESIGN;

DESIGN;

EID: 84951766875     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Highsmith, J., Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer 34, 120–127 (2001)
2. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley Longman, Boston (1998)
3. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns. Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1994)
4. Purao, S., Storey, V.C., Han, T.D.: Improving analysis pattern reuse in conceptual design: augmenting automated processes with supervised learning. Inf. Syst. Res. 14, 269–290 (2003)
5. Kolp, M., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J.: Organizational patterns for early requirements analysis. In: Eder, J., Missikoff, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2681, pp. 617–632. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
6. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–356 (2013)
7. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G., El Sawy, O.: Building an information system design theory for viligant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36–59 (1992)
8. van Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Manage. Stud. 41, 219–246 (2004)
9. Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information system - a need for multi-grounding. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA) 6, 59–72 (2004)
10. Hanseth, O., Lyytinen, K.: Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 1–19 (2010)
11. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. Mis Q. 611–642 (2006)
12. Protzen, J.-P., Harris, D.: The Universe of Design: Horst Rittel’s Theories of Design and Planning. Routledge, London (2010)
13. Dey, D., Storey, V.C., Barron, T.M.: Improving database design through the analysis of relationships. ACM Trans. Database Syst. (TODS) 24, 453–486 (1999)
14. Carlsson, S.A.: Developing knowledge through IS design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 75–86 (2007)
15. Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26, 179–203 (2002)
16. Romme, A.: Making a difference: organization as design. Decis. Support Syst. 14, 558–573 (2003)
17. Nagel, E.: The structure of science. Am. J. Phys. 29, 716 (1961)
18. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)
19. Leiner, B.M., Cerf, V.G., Clark, D.D., Kahn, R.E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D.C., Postel, J., Roberts, L.G., Wolff, S.: A brief history of the internet. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 39, 22–31 (2009)
20. Osterwalder, A.: The business model ontology: a proposition in a design science approach. Faculty of Business and Economics, Doctor. University of Lausanne (2004)
21. Timmers, P.: Business models for electronic markets. Electron. Markets 8, 3–8 (1998)
22. Seidwitz, E.: What models mean. IEEE Softw. 20, 26–32 (2003)
23. Papazoglou, M.P.: Service-oriented computing: concepts, characteristics and directions. In: Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE 2003, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on, pp. 3–12. IEEE (2003)
24. Scheer, A.W.: ARIS Business Process Modeling. Springer, Berlin (2000)
25. Zachman, J.A.: The Zachman framework: a primer for enterprise engineering and manufacturing (electronic book) (2003)
26. Aßmann, U., Zschaler, S., Wagner, G.: Ontologies, meta-models, and the model-driven paradigm. In: Calero, C., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. (eds.) Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology, pp. 249–273. Springer, Berlin (2006)
27. Yu, E.: Modelling strategic relationships for process reengineering. Soc. Model. Requirements Eng. 11, 2011 (2011)
28. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: an agentoriented software development methodology. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 8, 203–236 (2004)
29. Gregoriades, A., Shih, J.-E., Sutcliffe, A.: Human-centred requirements engineering. In: Requirements Engineering Conference, 2004, Proceedings, 12th IEEE International, pp. 154–163. IEEE (2004)
30. Model Driven Architecture (MDA), MDA Guide rev. 2.0. Object Management Group (2014)
31. Telang, P.R., Singh, M.P.: Specifying and verifying cross-organizational business models: an agent-oriented approach. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 5, 305–318 (2012)
32. Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns, Reusable Object Models. Addison-Wesley, Longman, Boston (1997)
33. Alexander, C.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (1978)
34. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice-Hall, New York, London (1988)
35. Fowler, M.: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2002)
36. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J.: Explanatory design theory. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 5, 271–282 (2010)
37. Romme, A.G.L., Endenburg, G.: Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organ. Sci. 17, 287–297 (2006)
38. Pascal, A., Thomas, C., Romme, G.A.: An integrative design methodology to support an interorganizational knowledge management solution. In: Proceedings of the ICIS Conference (2009)
39. Bunge, M.: Scientific Research II: the Search for Truth. Springer, Berlin (1967)
40. van Aken, J.E.: Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Br. J. Manage. 16, 19–36 (2005)
41. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5, 121–147 (1994)
42. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 5, 203–223 (1995)
43. Maaß, W., Varshney, U.: Design and evaluation of ubiquitous information systems and use in healthcare. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 597–609 (2012)
44. Mead, G.H.: Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of A Social Behaviorist. [Edited and with an Introduction by Charles W. Morris]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 18, 1972 (1934)
45. Maass, W., Janzen, S.: Pattern-based approach for designing with diagrammatic and propositional conceptual models. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 192–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
46. Martin, R.C.: Clean Code: a Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Pearson Education, New York (2009)
47. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
48. Noy, N., Rector, A., Hayes, P., Welty, C.: Defining n-ary relations on the semantic web. W3C Working Group Note 12 April 2006
49. De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M., Navigli, R.: A software engineering approach to ontology building. Inf. Syst. 34, 258–275 (2009)
50. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies. WonderWeb (2003)
51. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (2005)
52. Wagner, G.: The agent–object-relationship metamodel: towards a unified view of state and behavior. Inf. Syst. 28, 475–504 (2003)
53. Cockburn, A.: Structuring Use Cases with Goals1 (1997)
54. Singh, S.N., Woo, C.: Investigating business-IT alignment through multi-disciplinary goal concepts. Requirements Eng. 14, 177–207 (2009)
55. Yu, E.: Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. Department of Computer Science, Ph.D. University of Toronto (1995)
56. Maass, W., Storey, V.C.: Recall of concepts and relationships learned by conceptual models: the impact of narratives, general-purpose, and pattern-based conceptual grammars. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 377–384. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)