A patento-scientometric approach to venture capital investment prioritization

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 765-777

  Motta, Gustavo Da Silva ^a   Garcia, Pauli Adriano De Almada ^a   Quintella, Rogério Hermida ^b  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

business; funding; management

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; FUNDING; INVESTMENT PROPOSALS; PRIORITIZATION; TECHNOLOGY-BASED; VENTURE CAPITAL; VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS;

INVESTMENTS;

BRAZIL; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; INVESTMENT; MANAGER; MARKET;

EID: 84951747129     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23205     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adams, J., King, C., &, Singh, V, (2009). Global research report: India: research and collaboration in the new geography of science. Leeds, UK: Thomson Reuters.
2. Albuquerque, E.M., (1997). Notas sobre os determinantes tecnolõgicos do catching up: uma introdução à discussão sobre o papel dos sistemas nacionais de inovação na periferia. Estudos Econômicos, 27 (2).
3. Albuquerque, E.M., (1998). Produção científica e sistema nacional de inovação. Ensaios FEE, Porto Alegre, 19 (1), 156-180.
4. Albuquerque, E.M., (2003). Immature systems of innovation: Introductory notes about a comparison between South Africa, India, Mexico and Brazil based on science and technology statistics. Globelics Conference. Rio de Janeiro: Globelics.
5. Albuquerque, E., &, Sicsú, J., (2000). Inovação institucional e estímulo ao investimento privado. São Paulo em Perspectiva, 14 (3), 108-114.
6. Alcacer, J., &, Gittelman, M., (2004). How do I know what you know? Patent examiners and the generation of patent citations. SSRN.
7. Bank of England. (1996). The financing of technology-based small firms. London: Bank of England.
8. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., &, Cooper, W.W., (1984). Some models for estimating technical scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30 (9), 1078-1092.
9. Barry, C.B., Muscarella, C.J., Peavy, J.W. III, &, Vetsuypens, M.R., (1990). The role of venture capital in the creation of public firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 447-471.
10. Bassecoulard, E., &, Zitt, M., (2004). Patents and publications: The lexical connection. In, H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch, (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press. pp. 665-714.
11. Battini, P., (1985). Capital et risque. Paris: Editions des Organizations.
12. Bhattacharya, S., Kretschmer, H., &, Meyer, M., (2003). Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology. Scientometrics, 58 (2), 369-390.
13. Birch, D., (1979). The job creation process. In MIT program on neighbourhood and regional change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Bygrave, W.D., &, Timmons, J.A., (1992). Venture capital at the crossroads. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Caporaletti, L.E., Dulá, J.H., &, Womer, N.K., (1999). Performance evaluation based on multiple attributes with nonparametric frontiers. Omega, 27 (6), 637-645.
16. Carvalho, A.G., Ribeiro, L.L., &, Furtado, C.V., (2006). A indústria de Private Equity e venture capital: primeiro censo brasileiro. São Paulo: Saraiva.
17. CGEE. (2008). Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos. Os novos instrumentos de apoio à inovação: uma avaliação inicial. Brasília: ANPEI (Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento).
18. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., &, Rhodes, E., (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
19. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., &, Seiford, L.M., (1994). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Boston: KAP.
20. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., &, Tone, K., (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. New York: Springer.
21. Cortes, H., (2010). Análise da demanda por venture capital no âmbito do FMIEE Criatec. Dissertação (mestrado em Administração). Faculdade Boa Viagem, Recife.
22. Cumming, D.J., (2008). Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. Review of Financial Studies, 21 (5), 1947-1982.
23. Cumming, D.J., &, MacIntosh, J.G., (2003). A cross-country comparison of full and partial venture capital exits. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27 (3), 511-548.
24. Dagnino, R., (2010). Por que os "nossos" empresários não inovam? In:, R. Dagnino, (Ed.), Estudos sociais da ciência e tecnologia & política de ciência e tecnologia: alternativas para uma nova América Latina. Campina Grande, Brazil: EDUEPB. pp. 47-68.
25. Day, G.S., Schoemaker, P.J.H., &, Gunther, R.E., (2000). Wharton on managing emerging technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Denis, D.J., (2004). Entrepreneurial finance: An overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10 (2), 301-326.
27. Dimov, D., &, Murray, G., (2008). Determinants of the incidence and scale of seed capital investments. Small Business Economics, 30, 127-152.
28. Dushnitsky, G., &, Lenox, M.J., (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34 (5), 615-639. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.017
29. Edwards, C., (1999). Entrepreneurial dynamism and the success of US high tech. Joint Economic Committee Staff Report, Office of the Chairman, U.S. Senator Connie Mack, Washington, DC: US Senate.
30. European Commission. (1998). Risk capital: A key to job creation in the European Union. Luxembourg, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
31. Florida, R., &, Kenney, M., (1988). Venture capital financed innovation and technological change in the U.S.A. Research Policy, 119-137.
32. Fredricksen, O., Olofsson, C., &, Wahlbin, C., (1997). Are venture capitalists firefighters? A study of the influence and impact of venture capital firms. Technovation, 17 (9), 503-511.
33. Freeman, C., &, Soete, L., (1997). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.
34. Garcez, M.P., &, Anselmo, J.L., (2005). O panorama brasileiro do capital de risco: características, evolução e perspectiva. In: 11 ALTEC. Salvador: ALTEC.
35. Global Insight. (2007). Venture impact: The economic importance of venture capital backed companies to the U.S. economy (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Venture Capital Association and Content First, LLC.
36. Gompers, P.A., &, Lerner, J., (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 145-168.
37. Gompers, P.A., Lerner, J., &, Sharfstein, D., (2005). Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures 1986 to 1999. Journal of Finance, 60 (2), 577-614.
38. Griliches, Z., (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4), 1661-1707.
39. Guimarães, J.A., &, Humman, M.C., (1995). Training of human resources in science and technology in Brazil: The importance of vigorous post-graduate program and its impact on the development of the country. Scientometrics., 34 (1), 101-119.
40. Guzmán Sánchez, M.V., (1999). Patentometría: herramienta para el analisis de oportunidades tecnolõgicas. La Habana, Tesis (Gerencia de informaciõn tecnolõgica), Facultad de Economia. La Habana, Cuba: Universidad de La Habana.
41. Hyytinen, A., &, Toivanen, O., (2005). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy, 34, 1385-1403.
42. IETS. (2002). Criação de um ambiente favorável aos micro e pequenos negõcios e desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
43. Kortum, S., &, Lerner, J., (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 31 (4), 674-692. doi: 10.2307/2696354
44. Leite, P., Mugnaini, R., &, Leta, J., (2011). A new indicator for international visibility: Exploring Brazilian scientific community. Scientometrics, 88, 311-319.
45. Leydesdorff, L., (2008). Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59 (10), 1582-1597.
46. Lins, M.P.E., &, Meza, L.A., (2000). Análise Envoltõria de Dados e Perspectivas de Integração no Ambiente de Apoio à Decisão. COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 2000.
47. Lovell, C., &, Pastor, J.T., (1999). Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 118 (1), 46-51.
48. Macias-Chapula, C.A., (1998). O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional. Ciência da Informação, 27 (2), 134-140.
49. MacMillan, I.C., Zemann, L., &, SubbaNarisimha, P.N., (1989). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 119-128.
50. Maricato, J.M., (2010). Dinâmica das relações entre Ciência e Tecnologia: estudo Bibliométrico e Cientométrico de múltiplos indicadores de artigos e patentes em biodiesel. Tese (Doutorado)-Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Comunicação e Artes, Programa de Põs-Graduação em Ciência da Informação, São Paulo, Brazil.
51. Motta, G.S., &, Quintella, R.H., (2012). Assessment of non-financial criteria in the selection of investment projects for seed capital funding: The contribution of scientometrics and patentometrics. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7 (3), 172-193.
52. National Science Foundation. (2010). Division of Science Resources Statistics. Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA.
53. Oakey, R., (1984). High technology small firms: Innovation and regional development in Britain and the United States. London: Frances Prints Publishers.
54. Okubo, Y., (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples, OCDE Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. OCDE Publishing.
55. Pissarides, F., (1999). Is lack of funds the main obstacle to growth? EBRD's experience with small- and medium-sized businesses in central and eastern Europe. Journal of Business Venturing, 14 (5-6), 519-539.
56. Rapini, M., Albuquerque, E., Chaves, C., Silva, L., Souza, S., Righi, H., &, Silva da Cruz, W.M., (2009). University-industry interactions in an immature system of innovation: Evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Science and Public Policy, 36 (5), 373-386.
57. Santos, S.A., &, Dutra, I., (2005). Capital de risco e as empresas de alta tecnologia. In, S.A. Santos, (Ed.), Empreendedorismo de base tecnolõgica: evolução e trajetõria. Maringá/PR: Unicorpore.
58. Schefczyk, M., &, Gerpott, T.J., (2001). Management support for portfolio companies of venture capital firms: An empirical study of German venture capital investments. British Journal of Management, 12, 201-216.
59. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., &, Logan, A.J., (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In, H. Silkman, (Ed.), Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60. Shelton, R.D., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2012). Publish or patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 63 (3), 498-511.
61. Sicsu, J., &, Oliveira, S.C., (2003). Taxa de juros e controle da inflação no Brasil. In, J. Sicsu, J.L. Oreiro, L.F. Paula, (Eds.), Agenda Brasil: políticas econômicas para o crescimento com estabilidade de preços. São Paulo, Brazil: Monole.
62. Soares de Mello, J.C.C.B., Meza, L.A., &, da Silva, B.B., (2008). Some rankings for the Athens Olympic Games using DEA model with a constant input. Investigação Operacional, 28, 77-89.
63. Storey, D.J., &, Tether, B., (1998). New Technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26, 933-946.
64. UNESCO. (2010). UNESCO science report 2010. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
65. Wonglimpiyarat, J., (2010). Commercialization strategies of technology: Lessons from Silicon Valley. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35 (2), 225-236.
66. Zhu, J., (2009). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analtsis with spreadsheets. New York: Springer.