University-industry interactions in an immature system of innovation: Evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 373-386

  Rapini, Márcia Siqueira ^a   da Motta e Alberquerque, Eduardo ^a   Chave, Catari Vilela ^a   Silva, Leandro Alves ^b   de Souza, Sara Gonçalves Autunes ^c   Righi, Hérica Morais ^d   da Cruz, Wellington Marcelo Silva ^e  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b Instituto Euvaldo Lodi   (Brazil)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF MONTES CLAROS   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^e FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

BRAZIL; MINAS GERAIS; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 70149112055     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234209X442016     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albuquerque, E 1999. National systems of innovation and non-OECD countries: notes about a tentative typology. Revista de Economia Política, 19(4), 35-52.
2. Albuquerque, E 2004. Science and technology systems in less developed countries. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch (eds.), 759-778. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Araújo, A L L 2008. How do institutions shape the formation of technological cooperation? Evidence from Brazil. Globelics Conference, Mexico. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
4. Banco de Desenvolvimento de Minas Gerais (BDMG) 2002. Minas Gerais no século XXI. Belo Horizonte: BDMG. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
5. Bernardes, A and E Albuquerque 2003. Cross-over, thresholds and the interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries. Research Policy, 32(5), 867-887.
6. Carvalho, J M 2002. A Escola de Minas de Ouro Preto: o peso da glória, 2nd edn., Belo Horizonte, Brasil: Editora da UFMG.
7. Castaños-Lomnitz, H 1995. University, government and industry in Mexico: the shared dislike of each other. Science and Public Policy, 22(5), 325-332.
8. Cohen, M and D Levinthal 1989. Innovating and learning: the two faces of P&D. Economic Journal, 99(3), 569-596.
9. Cohen, W, R Nelson and J Walsh 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public R&D on industrial research. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
10. Eun, J-H, K Lee, K and G Wu 2006. Explainning the university-run-enterprises in China: a theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 35(9), 1329-1346.
11. FAPESP (State of São Paulo Research Foundation) 2005. Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in the State of São Paulo/Brazil 2004. FAPESP: São Paulo. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
12. Freeman, C 1995. The National System of Innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
13. Fundação João Pinheiro 2004. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
14. Instituto Brasilerio de Geografia Estatística (IBGE) 2005. Pesquisa Industrial - Inovação Tecnológica 2003 - PINTEC. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
15. Jasinski, A H 1997. New development in science-industry linkages in Poland. Science and Public Policy, 24(2), 93-99.
16. Klevorick, A, R Levin, R Nelson and S Winter 1995. On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185-205.
17. Mazzoleni, R 2005. Historical patterns in the coevolution of higher education, public research and national industrial capabilities. Background paper prepared for UNIDO (2005), Vienna: UNIDO. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
18. Mazzoleni, R and R Nelson 2005. The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch up. New York (unpublished manuscript).
19. Motoyama, S ed. 2004. Prelúdio para uma história: ciência e tecnologia no Brasil. São Paulo: EDUSP
20. Mowery, D and B Sampat 2005. Universities in National Innovation Systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. J Fagerberg, D Mowery and R Nelson eds., pp 209-239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Narin, F, K S Hamilton and D Olivastro 1997. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
22. Nelson, R 1990. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, 19(3), 193-214.
23. Nelson, R ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Nelson, R and N Rosenberg 1993.Techical innovation and national systems. In National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis, R Nelson ed., pp 76-114. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Patel, P and K Pavitt 1994. National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77-95.
26. Pavitt, K 1998. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27(8), 793-805.
27. Rapini. M S 2007.Interação Universidade-Empresa no Brasil: evidências do Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa no Brasil. Estudos Econômicos, 37(2), 212-233.
28. Rapini, M S, E Albuquerque, L Silva, S Souza, H M Righi and W M S Cruz 2006. Spots of Interactions: an investigation on the relationship between firms and universities in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Texto para Discussão do Cedeplar, n. 286. Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
29. Rosenberg, N and R Nelson 1994. American university and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323-348.
30. Rosenberg, N 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rosenberg, N 1991. Why do firms do basic research (with their money)? Research Policy, 19(1), 165-174.
32. Rosenberg, N 1992. Scientific instrumentation and university research? Research Policy, 21(4), 381-390.
33. Rosenberg, N 2000. Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: some American Perspectives. London: Routledge.
34. Rothwell, R 1991. External networking and innovations in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe. Technovation, 11(2), 93-112.
35. Saad, M, G Zawdie and C Malairaja 2008. The triple helix strategy for universities in developing countries: the experiences in Malaysia and Algeria. Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 431-443.
36. Schiller, D 2009. Autonomy and entrepreneurial universities in the Thai higher education system: the case of King Mongkut's University of Technology, Thonburi. Science and Public Policy, forthcoming.
37. Silva, L A 2003. Padrões de interação entre ciência e tecnologia. Dissertação de Mestrado. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR-UFMG.
38. Souza-Antunes, S 2001. Potencialidades da biotecnologia em Minas Gerais: Estudo sobre Empresas e suas Relações com Universidades. Dissertação de Mestrado. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR-UFMG.
39. Stankiewicz, R 1994. Spin-off companies from universities. Science and Public Policy, 21(2), 99-107.
40. Stepan, N 1976. Beginnings of Brazilian Science: Osvaldo Cruz, Medical Research and Policy, 1890-1920. New York: Science History Publications.
41. Suzigan, W 2000. Indústria brasileira: origem e desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Hucitec.
42. Suzigan, W and E Albuquerque 2008. A interação entre universidades e empresas em perspectiva histórica no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR-UFMG (TD 329). Available at , last accessed 22 May 2009.
43. Švarc, J, G Grubišić and S Sokol 1996. Contract research as an indicator of science-industry co-operation in Croatia. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 305-310.
44. Valentin, E M M 2002. Co-operative relationships. Science and Public Policy, 29(1), 37-46.
45. Viotti, E, A Baessa and P Koeller 2005. Perfil da inovação na indústria brasileira: uma comparação internacional. In Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras, J A Negri and M Salerno eds., pp 653-687. Brasília: IPEA.