An analysis of the operation of a flexible oxy-fired CFB power plant integrated with a thermal energy storage system

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 45, Issue , 2016, Pages 172-180

  Arias, B ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DEL CARBÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

CO2 capture; Energy storage; Flexible power output; Oxy fired combustion

Indexed keywords

COAL COMBUSTION; COMBUSTORS; ENERGY STORAGE; HEAT STORAGE; POWER PLANTS; STEAM ENGINEERING; TEMPERATURE;

CO2 CAPTURE; ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS; HIGH TEMPERATURE; LOW TEMPERATURES; NET POWER OUTPUTS; POWER OUT PUT; POWER REQUIREMENT; THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS;

THERMOELECTRIC POWER;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMBUSTION; POWER PLANT; SILO; THERMAL POWER;

EID: 84951738477     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arias B., Criado Y.A., Sanchez-Biezma A., Abanades J.C. Oxy-fired fluidized bed combustors with a flexible power output using circulating solids for thermal storage. Appl. Energy 2014, 132:127-136.
2. Basu P. Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers. Design, Operation and Maintenance 2015, Springer International Publishing.
3. 2 capture in response to volatile electricity prices. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2604-2611.
4. Chalmers H., Gibbins J. Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance. Fuel 2007, 86(14):2109-2123.
5. 2 capture. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):4289-4296.
6. Darde A., Prabhakar R., Tranier J.-P., Perrin N. Air separation and flue gas compression and purification units for oxy-coal combustion systems. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):527-534.
7. Davison J. Flexible CCS plants - a key to near-zero emission electricity systems. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:2548-2555.
8. DOE/NETL Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. Final Report: 2007/1281 2007.
9. Domenichini R., Mancuso L., Ferrari N., Davison J. Operating flexibility of power plants with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). Energy Procedia 2013, 37:2727-2737.
10. 2 Capture, Report 2007/13 2007, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
11. Hagi H., Nemer M., Le Moullec Y., Bouallou C. Pathway for advanced architectures of oxy-pulverized coal power plants: minimization of the global system exergy losses. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:1331-1340.
12. Haines M.R., Davison J.E. Designing carbon capture power plants to assist in meeting peak power demand. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):1457-1464.
13. Hausz W., Berkowitz B.J., Hare R.C. Conceptual Design of Thermal Energy Storage Systems for Near Term Electric Utility Applications. Vol. 1: Screening of Concepts. Report DOE/NASA/0012-78/1 1978.
14. Hotta A., Kuivalainen R., Eriksson T., Lupion M., Cortes V., Sacristan A.S.B., Jubitero J.M., Ballesteros J.C. Development and demonstration of oxy-fuel CFB technology. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2012, 112(6):431-436.
15. Hu Y., Li X., Li H., Yan J. Peak and off-peak operations of the air separation unit in oxy-coal combustion power generation systems. Appl. Energy 2013, 112:747-754.
16. IEAGHG Operating Flexibility of Power Plants with CCS 2012.
17. 2 transport and storage. Energy Procedia 2014, 63:2715-2722.
18. Johansson A., Johnsson F., Leckner B. Solids back-mixing in CFB boilers. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62(1-2):561-573.
19. Keatley P., Shibli A., Hewitt N.J. Estimating power plant start costs in cyclic operation. Appl. Energy 2013, 111:550-557.
20. Kitto J.B., Stultz S.C. Steam, Its Generation and Use 2005, The Babcok & Wilcox Company, Barberton, OH, USA. 41st ed.
21. Kumar N., Besuner P., Lefton S., Agan D. Power Plant Cycling Costs 2012, National Renewable Laboratory.
22. Nsakala N., Liljedahl G.N., Turek D. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Control by Oxygen Firing in Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers-Phase II. Final Technical Progress Report, No. PPL-04-CT-25 2004, Alstom Power Inc.
23. Ozarslan A. Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37(19):14265-14277.
24. Ozcan D.C., Ahn H., Brandani S. Process integration of a Ca-looping carbon capture process in a cement plant. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 19:530-540.
25. Perrin N., Dubettier R., Lockwood F., Court P., Tranier J.-P., Bourhy-Weber C., Devaux M. Oxycombustion for carbon capture on coal power plants and industrial processes: advantages, innovative solutions and key projects. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:1389-1404.
26. Rubin E.S., Mantripragada H., Marks A., Versteeg P., Kitchin J. The outlook for improved carbon capture technology. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38(5):630-671.
27. van der Wijk P.C., Brouwer A.S., van den Broek M., Slot T., Stienstra G., van der Veen W., Faaij A.P.C. Benefits of coal-fired power generation with flexible CCS in a future northwest European power system with large scale wind power. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2014, 28:216-233.
28. Williams R.H. Toward zero emissions from coal in China. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2001, 5(4):39-65.