Contingency Management Abstinence Incentives: Cost and Implications for Treatment Tailoring

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 72, Issue , 2017, Pages 134-139

  Cunningham, Colin ^a   Stitzer, Maxine ^a   Campbell, Aimee N C ^b   Pavlicova, Martina ^c   Hu, Mei Chen ^b   Nunes, Edward V ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health Department of Biostatistics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Baseline drug use; Contingency management; Incentive costs; Treatment tailoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; DRUG DEPENDENCE; ECONOMICS; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REWARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COUNSELING; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; REWARD; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84951736958     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: 18736483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alterman, A.I., Kampman, K., Boardman, C.R., Cacciola, J.S., Rutherford, M.J., McKay, J.R., Maany, I., A cocaine-positive baseline urine predicts outpatient treatment attrition and failure to attain initial abstinence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 46:1-2 (1997), 79–85.
2. Barry, D., Sullivan, B., Petry, N.M., Comparable efficacy of contingency management for cocaine dependence among African American, Hispanic, and White methadone maintenance clients. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 23:1 (2009), 168–174.
3. Benishek, L.A., Dugosh, K.L., Kirby, K.C., Matejkowski, J., Clements, N.T., Seymour, B.L., Festinger, D.S., Prize-based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: A meta-analysis. Addiction 109 (2014), 1426–1436.
4. Benishek, L.A., Kirby, K.C., Dugosh, K.L., Padovano, A., Beliefs about the empirical support of drug abuse treatment interventions: A survey of outpatient treatment providers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 107:2-3 (2010), 202–208.
5. Bickel, W.K., Marsch, L.A., Buchhalter, A.R., Badger, G.J., Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: A randomized controlled trial. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 16 (2008), 132–143.
6. Budney, A.J., Higgins, S.T., Delaney, D.D., Kent, L., Bickel, W.K., Contingent reinforcement of abstinence with individuals abusing cocaine and marijuana. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analytics 24:4 (1991), 657–665.
7. Budney, A., Higgins, S., Therapy manuals for drug addiction, a community reinforcement plus vouchers approach: Treating cocaine addiction. 1998, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
8. Campbell, A.N., Nunes, E.V., McClure, E.A., Hu, M.C., Turrigiano, E., Goldman, B., Stabile, P.Q., Characteristics of an outpatient treatment sample by primary substance of abuse. Journal of Addiction Medicine 7:5 (2013), 363–371.
9. Campbell, A.N., Nunes, E.V., Miele, G.M., Matthews, A., Polsky, D., Ghitza, U.E.,. Crowell, A.R., Design and methodological considerations of an effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention: An example from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. Contemporary Clinical Trials 33:3 (2012), 386–395.
10. Campbell, A.N., Nunes, E.V., Matthews, A.G., Stitzer, M., Miele, G.M., Polsky, D.,. Ghitza, U.E., Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: A multisite randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 171:6 (2014), 683–690.
11. Cochran, G., Stitzer, M., Campbell, A.N., Hu, M.C., Vandrey, R., Nunes, E.V., Web-based treatment for substance use disorders; Differential effects by primary substance. Addictive Behaviors 45 (2015), 191–194.
12. Ehrman, R.N., Robbins, S.J., Cornish, J.W., Results of a baseline urine test predict levels of cocaine use during treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 62:1 (2001), 1–7.
13. Higgins, S.T., Delaney, D.D., Budney, A.J., Bickel, W.K., Hughes, J.R., Foerg, F., Fenwick, J.W., A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. American Journal of Psychiatry 148:9 (1991), 1218–1224.
14. Higgins, S.T., Budney, A.J., Bickel, W.K., Foerg, F.E., Donham, R., Badger, G.J., Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry 51:7 (1994), 568–576.
15. Kidorf, M., Stitzer, M.L., Brooner, R.K., Goldber, J., Contingent methadone take-home doses reinforce adjunct therapy attendance of methadone maintenance patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 36:3 (1994), 221–226.
16. Lussier, J.P., Heil, S.H., Mongeon, J.A., Badger, G.J., Higgins, S.T., A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 101:2 (2006), 192–203.
17. McGovern, M.P., Fox, T.S., Xie, H., Drake, R.E., A survey of clinical practices and readiness to adopt evidence-based practices: Dissemination research in an addiction treatment system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 26:4 (2004), 305–312.
18. Olmstead, T.A., Petry, N.M., The cost-effectiveness of prize-based and voucher-based contingency management in a population of cocaine- or opioid-dependent outpatients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 102:1-3 (2009), 108–115.
19. Olmstead, T.A., Sindelar, J.L., Petry, N.M., Clinic variation in the cost-effectiveness of contingency management. American Journal of Addictions 16:6 (2007), 457–460.
20. Petry, N.M., Martin, B., Cooney, J.L., Kranzler, H.R., Give them prizes, and they will come: Contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68:2 (2000), 250–257.
21. Petry, N.M., Tedford, J., Austin, M., Nich, C., Carroll, K.M., Rounsaville, B.J., Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: How low can we go, and with whom?. Addiction 99:3 (2004), 349–360.
22. Petry, N.M., Peirce, J.M., Stitzer, M.L., Blaine, J., Roll, J.M., Cohen, A.,. Li, R., Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Achives of General Psychiatry 62 (2005), 1148–1156.
23. Petry, N.M., Rash, C.J., Easton, C.J., Contingency management treatment in substance abusers with and without legal problems. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 39:3 (2011), 370–378.
24. Petry, N.M., Barry, D., Alessi, S.M., Rounsaville, B.J., Carroll, K.M., A randomized trial adapting contingency management targets based on initial abstinence status of cocaine-dependent patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 80:2 (2012), 276–285.
25. Rash, C.J., Olmstead, T.A., Petry, N.M., Income does not affect response to contingency management treatments among community substance abuse treatment-seekers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 104:3 (2009), 249–253.
26. Robles, E., Stitzer, M.L., Strain, E.C., Bigelow, G.E., Silverman, K., Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate abstinence during methadone detoxification. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 65:2 (2002), 179–189.
27. Secades-Villa, R., Garcia-Fernandez, G., Pena-Suarez, E., Garcia-Rodriguez, O., Sanchez-Hervas, S., Fernandez-Hermida, J.R., Contingency management is effective across cocaine-dependent outpatients with different socioeconomic status. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 44:3 (2012), 349–354.
28. Shoptaw, S., Jarvik, M.E., Ling, W., Rawson, R.A., Contingency management for tobacco smoking in methadone-maintained opiate addicts. Addictive Behaviors 21:3 (1996), 409–412.
29. Silverman, K., Wong, C.J., Higgins, S.T., Brooner, R.K., Montoya, I.D., Contoreggi, C.,. Preston, K.L., Increasing opiate abstinence through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 41:2 (1996), 157–165.
30. Silverman, K., Wong, C.J., Umbricht-Schneiter, A., Montoya, I.D., Schuster, C.R., Preston, K.L., Broad beneficial effects of cocaine abstinence reinforcement among methadone patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66:5 (1998), 811–824.
31. Sobell, L.C., Sobell, M.B., Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. Litten, R.Z., Allen, J., (eds.) Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods, 1992, Humana Press, New Jersey, 41–72.
32. Stitzer, M.L., Iguchi, M.Y., Felch, L.J., Contingent take-home incentive: Effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 60:6 (1992), 927–934.
33. Stitzer, M., Petry, N., Contingency management for treatment of substance abuse. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2 (2006), 411–434.
34. Stitzer, M.L., Peirce, J., Petry, N.M., Kirby, K., Roll, J., Krasnansky, J.,. Li, R., Abstinence-based incentives in methadone maintenance: Interaction with intake stimulant test results. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 15:4 (2007), 344–350.
35. Stitzer, M.L., Petry, N.M., Peirce, J.M., Motivational incentives research in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 38:S1 (2010), S61–S69.
36. Weinstock, J., Alessi, S.M., Petry, N.M., Regardless of psychiatric severity the addition of contingency management to standard treatment improves retention and drug use outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 87:2-3 (2007), 288–296.
37. Willenbring, M.L., Hagedorn, H.J., Postier, A.C., Kenny, M., Variations in evidence-based clinical practices in nine United States Veterans Administration opioid agonist therapy clinics. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 75:1 (2004), 97–106.