Contingency management treatment in substance abusers with and without legal problems

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 370-378

  Petry, Nancy M ^a   Rash, Carla J ^a   Easton, Caroline J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; DRUG USERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEW ENGLAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 80052673161     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Glaze LE, Bonczar TP: Probation and Parole in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2009, NCJ Publication No. 228230
2. Taxman FS, Young DW, Wiersema B, et al: The National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices Survey: multilevel survey methods and procedures. J Subst Abuse Treat 32:225-38, 2007
3. National Institute of Justice: 2000 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Annual Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 2003
4. Maxwell JC: Substance Abuse Trends in Texas-December 1995. Austin, TX: Texas Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 1996
5. Price RH, D'Aunno T: NIDA III Respondent Report Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey: A National Study of the Outpatient Drug-Free and Methadone Treatment System, 1988-1990 Results. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 1992
6. Weisner CM: The social ecology of alcohol treatment in the United States. Recent Dev Alcohol 5:203- 43, 1987
7. Kelly JF, Finney JW, Moos R: Substance use disorder patients who are mandated to treatment: characteristics, treatment process, and 1- and 5-year outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat 28:213-23, 2005
8. Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Dugosh KL, et al: Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: discharge and 6-month outcomes from a prospective matching study. Drug Alcohol Depend 88(Suppl 2):S4 -13, 2007
9. Pelissier B, Jones N, Cadigan T: Drug treatment aftercare in the criminal justice system: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 32:311-20, 2007
10. Easton CJ, Babuscio T, Carroll KM: Treatment retention and outcome among cocaine-dependent patients with and without active criminal justice involvement. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:83-91, 2007
11. Hubbard RL, Collins JJ, Rachal JV, et al: The criminal justice clients in substance abuse treatment, in Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. NIDA Research Monographs 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM 89-1578. Edited by Leukefield CM, Tims FM. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988, pp 57-80
12. Peirce JM, Petry NM, Roll JM, et al: Correlates of stimulant treatment outcome across treatment modalities. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 35:48 -53, 2009
13. Vaughn T, Sarrazin MV, Saleh SS, et al: Participation and retention in drug abuse treatment services research. J Subst Abuse Treat 4:387-97, 2002
14. Petry NM: A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings. Drug Alcohol Dependence 58:9 -25, 2000
15. Peirce JM, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, et al: Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:201- 8, 2006
16. Petry NM, Martin B, Cooney JL, et al: Give them prizes, and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:250 -7, 2000
17. Petry NM, Martin B: Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:398-405, 2002
18. Petry NM, Tedford J, Austin M, et al: Prize reinforcement contingency management for treatment cocaine users: how low can we go, and with whom? Addiction 99:349-60, 2004
19. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Marx J, et al: Vouchers versus prizes: contingency management treatment of substance abusers in community settings. J Consult Clin Psychol 73:1005-14, 2005
20. Petry NM, Martin B, Simcic F: Prize reinforcement contingency management for cocaine dependence: integration with group therapy in a methadone clinic. J Consult Clin Psychol 73:354 -9, 2005
21. Petry NM, Peirce JM, Stitzer ML, et al: Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:1148 -56, 2005
22. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Carroll KM, et al: Contingency management treatments: reinforcing abstinence versus adherence with goal-related activities. J Consult Clin Psychol 74:592-601, 2006
23. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Hanson T, et al: Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 75:983-91, 2007
24. Petry NM, Weinstock J, Alessi SM, et al: Group-based randomized trial of contingencies for health and abstinence in HIV patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 78:89 -97, 2010
25. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, et al: A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 101:192-203, 2006
26. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, et al: Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction 101:1546-60, 2006
27. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994
28. Petry NM, Kolodner KB, Li R, et al: Prize-based contingency management does not increase gambling. Drug Alcohol Depend 83:269 -73, 2006
29. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, et al: New data from the Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity in three centers. J Nerv Ment Dis 173:412-23, 1985
30. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al: Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders: clinician version. Washington, DC: New York State Psychiatry Institute, 1996
31. Petry NM, Tedford J, Martin B: Reinforcing compliance with non-drug-related activities. J Subst Abuse Treat 20:33- 44, 2001
32. Lumley T, Diehr P, Emerson S, et al: The importance of the normality assumption in large public health datasets. Annu Rev Public Health 23:151- 69, 2002
33. Preston KL, Silverman K, Higgins ST, et al: Cocaine use early in treatment predicts outcome in a behavioral treatment program. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:691- 6, 1998
34. Silverman K, Wong CJ, Umbricht-Schneiter A, et al: Broad beneficial effects of cocaine abstinence reinforcement among methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:811-24, 1998
35. Stitzer ML, Peirce J, Petry NM, et al: Abstinence-based incentives in methadone maintenance: Interaction with intake stimulant test results. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:344 -50, 2007
36. Stitzer ML, Petry N, Peirce J, et al: Effectiveness of abstinencebased incentives: with intake stimulant test results. J Consult Clin Psychol 75:805-11, 2007
37. Carroll KM, Easton CJ, Nich C, et al: The use of contingency management and motivational/skills-building therapy to treat young adults with marijuana dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 74:955- 66, 2006
38. Sinha R, Easton C, Kemp K: Substance abuse treatment characteristics of probation-referred young adults in a communitybased outpatient program. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 29:585-97, 2003