Digital environmentalism: Tools and strategies for the evolving online ecosystem

Environmental Leadership: A Reference Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 364-372

  Thaler, Andrew David ^a   Zelnio, Kevin A ^b   Freitag, Amy ^c   MacPherson, Rick ^b   Shiffman, David ^d   Bik, Holly ^e   Goldstein, Miriam C ^f   McClain, Craig ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Duke University ^*  (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951291846     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218601.n39     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Bonetta, L. (2009). Should you be tweeting? Cell, 139(3), 452-453. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.017
2. Brockington, D., Igoe, J., & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006). Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 250-252.
3. Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099-1121.
4. Brumfiel, G. (2009). Science journalism: Supplanting the old media? Nature, 458, 274-275. doi:10.1038/458274a
5. Callaghan, P. (2007, September 5). Why communicate science. Retrieved from http://www.sciencealert.com.au/opinions/20070609-16305.html
6. Chappell, B. (2011). Social network analysis report: Geographic: Demographic and traffic data revealed. Retrieved from http://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/social-media-stats/2011-social-network-analysis-report
7. Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235-296.
8. Cooper, C., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 11.
9. Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L., & Marra, P. (2005). The Neighborhood Nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 589-594.
10. Fischer, F. (2002). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Planning Theory & Practice, 3, 249-255.
11. Furlong, S. R. (2004). Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 353-370.
12. Ghimire, K. B., Ghimire, K., & Pimbert, M. P. (1997). Social change and conservation: Environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. London, UK: Earthscan.
13. Golden, M. M. (1998). Interest groups in the rule-making process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard? Journal of Public Administration, Research & Theory, 8(2), 245-270.
14. Goldstein, M. (2007). Carbon export is dead stuff and poop, and so are Planktos’ arguments [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://theoystersgarter.com/2007/10/20/carbon-export-is-dead-stuff-and-poop-and-so-are-planktos-arguments
15. Groffman, P. M., Stylinski, C., Nisbet, M. C., Duarte, C. M., Jordan, R., Burgin, A.,… Coloso, J. (2010). Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 284-291.
16. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstanding science? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
18. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (2010). @ AIDS: Unlocking the potential of social media. Outlook (pp. 140-143). Retrieved from http://data.unaids.org/pub/Outlook/2010/20100713_outlook_report_web_en.pdf
19. Kouper, I. (2010). Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Science Communication, 9(1), 1-10.
20. Lepczyk, C. A. (2005). Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(4), 672-677.
21. MacPherson, R. (2007). To the dump, to the dump, to the dump, dump, dump [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://coralnotesfromthefield.blogspot.com/2007/10/to-dump-to-dump-to-dump-dump-dump.html
22. MacPherson, R. (2008). If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the carbon sequestration biz [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://coralnotesfromthefield.blogspot.com/2008/02/if-you-cant-stand-heat-stay-out-of.html
23. McClain, C. (2007). Will iron fertilization work? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://deepseanews.com/2007/10/will-iron-fertilization-work
24. McCormick, S. (2007). Democratizing science movements: A new framework for mobilization and contestation. Social Studies of Science, 37(4), 609-623.
25. Öztürk, M., Steinness, E., & Sakshaug, E. (2002). Iron speciation in the Trondheim Fjord from the perspective of iron limitation for phytoplankton. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55(2), 197-212.
26. Pilkey, O. H., Pilkey, K. C., & Fraser, M. E. (2011). Global climate change: A primer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27. Rosenberg, S. (2009). Say everything: How blogging began, what it’s becoming, and why it matters. New York, NY: Crown.
28. Royal Pingdom. (2010). Study: Ages of social network users [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/02/16/study-ages-of-social-network-users
29. Shanahan, M. C. (2011). Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging. Journalism, 12(7), 903-919.
30. Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
31. Shulman, S. W. (2009). The case against mass e-mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in U.S. federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet, 1(1), 23.
32. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(2), 467-471.
33. Thackeray, R., & Hunter, M. (2010). Empowering youth: Use of technology in advocacy to affect social change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 575-591.
34. Wilkins, J. S. (2008). The roles, reasons and restrictions of science blogs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(8), 411-413. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.004
35. Wolff, G. A., Billett, D. S. M., Bett, B. J., Holtvoeth, J., FitzGeorge-Balfour, T., Fisher, E. H.,… Chaillan, F. (2011). The effects of natural iron fertilisation on deep-sea ecology: The Crozet Plateau, southern Indian Ocean. PLoS ONE, 6 (6), e20697. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0020697
36. Wortham, J. (2007). After 10 years of blogs, the future’s brighter than ever. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/12/blog_anniversary
37. Yong, E. (2010). Not exactly rocket science: On jargon, and why it matters in science writing. Discover Magazine. Retrieved from http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/11/24/on-jargon-and-why-it-matters-in-science-writing
38. Zelnio, K. A. (2010). From the editor’s desk: Quantifying outreach to the cult of science [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://deepseanews.com/2010/11/from-the-editor%E2%80%99s-desk-quantifying-outreach-to-the-cult-of-science
39. Zivkovic, B. (2010). The line between science and journalism is getting blurry… again. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2010/12/20/the-line-between-science-and-journalism-is-getting-blurry-again