Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging

Journalism

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 903-919

  Shanahan, Marie Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

boundaries; participatory journalism; science blogging; science journalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052760011     PISSN: 14648849     EISSN: 17413001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1464884911412844     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson JD. Ludwig Pradtl's boundary layer. Physics Today. 2005 ; 58 (2). 42-48
2. Bucchi M Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication. New York: Routledge ; 1998 :
3. Bucchi M Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Bucchi M Trench B, ed. London: Routledge ; 2008 :
4. Burchell K. Boundary work, associative argumentation and switching in the advocacy of agricultural biotechnology. Science as Culture. 2007 ; 16: 49-70
5. Carr A, Wilkinson R. Beyond participation: Boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Society and Natural Resources. 2005 ; 18: 255-265
6. CBCNews (2010) NASA's arsenic microbe science slammed. CBCNews, [online] 6December. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2010/12/06/ arsenic-microbe-dna-nasa-wolfe-simon.html
7. Collins H, Evans R Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press ; 2007 :
8. Domingo D, Heinonen A. Weblogs and journalism: A typology to explore the blurring boundaries. Nordicom Review. 2008 ; 29 (1). 3-15
9. FangJ (2010) Chicken's split sex identity revealed: Half-male, half-female fowl explain sex determination. Scientific American, [online] 10December. Available at: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id= chickens-split-sex-identity
10. Fox NJ. Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. Sociology. 2011 ; 45 (1). 70-85
11. Gerring J. What is a case study and what is it good for?. American Political Science Review. 2004 ; 98: 341-354
12. Gieryn TF. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review. 1983 ; 48: 781-795
13. Gieryn TF Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press ; 1999 :
14. Gregory J, Miller S Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. London: Plenum ; 1998 :
15. Guston D. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology and Human Values. 2001 ; 26: 399-408
16. Hermida A. The BBC goes blogging: Is Auntie finally listening?. Paper presented at the 9th International Symposium on Online Journalism ; 2008 Austin TX, USA ; 2008..
17. Hermida A. The blogging BBC: Journalism blogs at 'the world's most trusted new organisation'. Journalism Practice. 2009 ; 3 (3). 1-17
18. Incropera FP, DeWitt DP Introduction to Heat Transfer. 1996 ) Introduction to Heat Transfer, 3rd edn.New York: John Wiley. New York: John Wiley ; 1996 :
19. KeimB (2010) Half-Cocked? Hermaphrochickens challenge gender determination. Wired.com, 10December. Available at: http://www.wired.com/ wiredscience/2010/03/chicken-sex/
20. Lowery W. Mapping the journalism-blogging relationship. Journalism. 2006 ; 7 (4). 477-500
21. McKennaM (2011) Personal communications, 3March.
22. Matheson D. Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism. New Media & Society. 2004 ; 6: 443-68
23. Norman DA The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books ; 1988 :
24. Norman DA Things that Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. New York: Basic Books ; 1994 :
25. Paster A, Dagan G. Mixing at the interface between two fluids in porous media: A boundary-layer solution. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2007 ; 584: 455-472
26. Rosenberg S Say Everything: How Blogging Began, What It's Becoming and Why It Matters. New York: Three Rivers Press ; 2009 :
27. SchenkmanL (2010) No sexual confusion for chicken cells. Science NOW, [online] 10December. Available at: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/ 03/no-sexual-confusion-for-chicken.html
28. Star SL Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Huhns M Gasser L, ed. Menlo Park, CA: Kaufman ; 1988 :
29. Star SL. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2010 ; 35: 601-617
30. Star SL, Griesemer J. Institutional ecology, 'translations', and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science. 1989 ; 19: 387-420
31. StraussS (2011) Rosie Redfield's blog a game-changer for scientific debate. CBCNews, [online] 7January. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/ technology/story/2010/12/06/arsenic-microbe-dna-nasa-wolfe-simon.html
32. YongE (2010a) Personal communications, 16November.
33. YongE (2010b) Every cell in a chicken has its own male or female identity. Not Exactly Rocket Science, blog post10March. Available at: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/10/ every-cell-in-a-chicken-has-its-own-male-or-female-identity/
34. Zhao D, McBride D, Nandi S, et al. Somatic sex identity is cell autonomous in the chicken. Nature. 2010 ; 464 (7286). 237-242
35. ZimmerC (2011) Personal communications, 24February.