Style, design, and function

Handbook of Material Culture

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 355-372

  Conkey, Margaret W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951278526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848607972.n24     Document Type: Chapter

References (185)

1. Adams M.-J. Structural aspects of a village Art American Anthropologist 75 (1973) 265-79 doi:10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00160
2. Akrich, M. (1992) The description of technical objects, in W. Bijker and J. Law, eds, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205-24.
3. Anderson, R. (1979) Art in Primitive Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Anderson, R. (1989) Art in Small-scale Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Appadurai, A., ed. (1986) The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Attfield J. Beyond the pale: reviewing the relationship between material culture and design history Journal of Design History 12 (4) (1999) 373-80 doi:10.1093/jdh/12.4.373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jdh/12.4.373
7. Attfield, J. (2000) Wild Things: the Material Culture of Everyday Life. Oxford and New York: Berg.
8. Barrett, S.A. (1908/1996) Pomo Indian Basketry. Berkeley, CA: Hearst Museum of Anthropology.
9. Barry H. III Relationships between child training and the pictorial arts Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54 (1957) 80-3
10. Bascom, W. (1969) Creativity and style in African art, in D. Beibuyk (ed.), Tradition and Creativity in Tribal Art. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 98-119.
11. Biebuyck, D. (1973) The Lega: Art, Initiation and Moral Philosophy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12. Binford L. Archaeology as anthropology American Antiquity 28 (2) (1962) 217-25 doi:10.2307/278380 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/278380
13. Binford L. Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process American Antiquity 31 (1965) 203-10 doi:10.2307/2693985 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2693985
14. Binford, S. and Binford, L., eds (1968) New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago: Aldine.
15. Bloch M. Symbols, song, dance, and features of articulation: is religion an extreme form of traditional authority? European Journal of Sociology 15 (1974) 55-98
16. Boas, F. (1927) Primitive Art. New York: Dover.
17. Boast R. A small company of actors: a critique of style Journal of Material Culture 2 (1997) 173-98 doi:10.1177/135918359700200202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135918359700200202
18. Boser-Sarivaxevanis, R. (1969) Apereus sur la teinturee l’indigo en Afrique occidentale. Basel: Naturforschen- den Gesellschaft.
19. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Brown, S.C. (1998) Native Visions: Evolution in Northwest Coast Art from the Eighteenth through to the Twentieth Century. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
22. Brumfiel E. It’s a material world: history, artifacts, and anthropology Annual Review of Anthropology 32 (2003) 205-23 doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093335
23. Bunzel, R. (1927) The Pueblo Potter: a Study of Creative Imagination in Primitive Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Cannizzo, J. (1996) Art, in A. Barnard and J. Spencer (eds), Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. London and New York: Routledge, p. 54.
25. Carr, C. and Nietzel, J.E. eds (1995) Style, Society, and Person. New York and London: Plenum Press.
26. Chiu, S. (2003) The Socio-economic Functions of Lapita Ceramic Production and Exchange: a Case Study from Site WKO013A, Kone, New Caledonia. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
27. Conkey, M.W. (1990) Experimenting with style in archaeology: some historical and theoretical issues, in M.W. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (eds), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5-17.
28. Conkey, M.W. and Hastorf, C.A. eds (1990) The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Conkey, M.W. Tringham, R.E. (1995) Archaeology and the goddess: exploring the contours of feminist archaeology, in D. Stanton and A. Stewart (eds), Feminisms in the Academy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 199-247.
30. Coote, J. (1992) Marvels of everyday vision: the anthropology of aesthetics and the cattle-keeping Nilotes, in J. Coote and A. Shelton (eds), Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 245-75.
31. Coote, J. (1996) Aesthetics is a cross-cultural category: for the motion, in T. Ingold (ed.), Key Debates in Anthropology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 266-75.
32. Cordwell, J. and Schwarz, R.A., eds (1979) The Fabrics of Culture: the Anthropology of Clothing and Adornment. The Hague: Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783111631523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783111631523
33. Cummins R. Functional explanation Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975) 741-64 doi:10.2307/2024640 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2024640
34. Davis, W. (1990) Style and history in Art History, in M.W. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (eds), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 18-31.
35. DeBoer, W. (1990) Interaction, imitation, and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience, in M.W. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (eds), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 82-103.
36. Deetz, J. (1965) The Dynamics of Stylistic Change in Arikara Ceramics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
37. Dietler M. Herbich I. Tich Matek: the technology of Luo pottery production and the definition of ceramic style World Archaeology 21 (1989) 148-64 doi:10.1080/00438243.1989.9980096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1989.9980096
38. Dietler, M. Herbich, I. (1994) Ceramics and ethnic identity: ethnoarchaeological observations on the distribution of pottery styles and the relationship between the social contexts of production and consumption, in D. Binder and F. Audouze (eds), Terre cuite en societe: la ceramique, document technique, economique, culturel. XIVe rencontre internationale d’archeologie et histoire d’Antibes. Juan-les-Pins: APDCA, pp. 459-72.
39. Dietler, M. Herbich, I. (1998). Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries, in M. Stark (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 232-63.
40. Dobres M.-A. Gender and prehistoric technology: on the social agency of technical strategies World Archaeology 27 (1) (1995) 25-49 doi:10.1080/00438243.1995.9980291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1995.9980291
41. Dobres, M.-A. (2000) Technology and Social Agency. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Dobres M.-A. Hoffman C. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1 (3) (1994) 211-58 doi:10.1007/BF02231876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02231876
43. Dobres, M.-A. and Hoffman, C., eds (1999) The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics and World View. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
44. Dunnell R. Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy American Antiquity 43 (1978) 192-202 doi:10.2307/279244 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/279244
45. Earle, T. (1990) Style and iconography as legitimation in complex chiefdoms, in M.W. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (eds), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-81.
46. Eco, U. (1990) Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
47. Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627408
48. Eicher J. The cultural significance of dress and textiles Reviews in Anthropology 30 (4) (2001) 309-24 doi:10.1080/00988157.2001.9978289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00988157.2001.9978289
49. Eisenstadt S.N. Functional analaysis in anthropology and sociology: an interpretive essay Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1990) 243-60 doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001331
50. Fabian, J. (1998) Moments of Freedom: Anthropology and Popular Culture. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
51. Faris, J.C. (1972) Nuba Personal Art. London: Duckworth.
52. Fernandez J.W. Principles of opposition and vitality in Fang aesthetics Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (1) (1966) 53-64
53. Firth, R. (1936) We, the Tikopia: a Sociological Study of Kinship in Primitive Polynesia. London: Allen 8 Unwin.
54. Fischer J. Art styles as cultural cognitive maps American Anthropologist 63 (1961) 79-93 doi:10.1525/aa.1961.63.1.02a00050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1961.63.1.02a00050
55. Forge, A. (1966) Art and environment in the Sepik, Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland for 1965. London: RAI, pp. 23-31.
56. Forge, A. (1970) Learning to see in New Guinea, in P. Mayer (ed.), Socialization: the Approach from Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock, pp. 269-91.
57. Friedrich M.H. Design structure and social interaction: archaeological implications of an ethnographic analysis American Antiquity 35 (1970) 332-43 doi:10.2307/278343 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/278343
58. Fritz, J.M. (1978) Paleopsychology today: ideational systems and human adaptation, in C. Redman, M.J. Berman, E.V. Curtin, Jr. W.T. Langhorne, N.M. Versaggi and J.C. Wanser (eds), Social Archaeology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 37-60.
59. Gadamer, H.-G (1965) Warheit and Methode. 2nd edn. Tabingen: Mohr.
60. Garlake, P. (1995) The Hunter’s Vision: the Prehistoric Art of Zimbabwe. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press and London: British Museum.
61. Gell, A. (1992) The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology, in J. Coote and A. Shelton (eds), Anthropology, Art, Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 40-67.
62. Gell, A. (1998) Art and Agency: an Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
63. George, K.M., ed. (1999) Objects on the Loose: Ethnographic Encounters with Unruly Artefacts, a special issue of Ethnos, 64 (2).
64. Gombrich, E. (1960) Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Pantheon Books.
65. Goodison, L. and Morris, C. eds (1998) Ancient Goddesses: the Myths and the Evidence. London: British Museum Press.
66. Graburn, N., ed. (1976) Ethnic and Tourist Arts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
67. Graburn, N. (1999) Epilogue: ethnic and tourist arts revisited, in R.B. Phillips and C.B. Steiner (eds), Unpacking Culture: Art and Commodity in Colonial and Post-colonial Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 335-53.
68. Graburn, N. (2001) Art: anthropological aspects, in N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences II. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 764-68. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00801-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00801-9
69. Graves M. The history of method and theory in the study of prehistoric Puebloan pottery style in the American southwest Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5 (4) (1998) 309-43 doi:10.1007/BF02428420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02428420
70. Handler, R. (1988) Nationalism and the Politics of Culture in Quebec. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
71. Hanson, F.A. (1983) When the map is the territory: art in Maori culture, in D.K. Washburn (ed.), Structure and Cognition in Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74-89.
72. Hegmon M. Archaeological research on style Annual Review of Anthropology 21 (1992) 517-36 doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505
73. Hegmon, M. (1998) Technology style and social practices: archaeological approaches, in M. Stark (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 264-79.
74. Hendrickson, C. (1993) Weaving Identities: Construction of Dress and Self in a Highland Guatemala Town. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
75. Hill, J. (1970) Broken K Pueblo: Prehistoric Social Organization in the American Southwest. Anthropological Papers 18. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
76. Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T., eds (1983) Inventing Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Hodder, I. (1990) Style as historical quality, in M.W. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (eds), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44-51.
78. Ingold, T. (1993) The reindeerman’s lasso, in P. Lemonnier (ed.), Technological Choices: Transformations in Material Culture since the Neolithic. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 108-25.
79. Ingold, T. (2000) Making culture and weaving the world, in P.M. Graves-Brown (ed.), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 5-71.
80. Ingold, T. (2004) Materials Against Materiality. Paper presented at the Theoretical Archaeology Group annual meetings, Glasgow, December.
81. Jarman, N. (1997) Material of culture, fabric of identity, in D. Miller (ed.), Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. London: UCL Press, pp. 121-45.
82. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C. and Pinch, T., eds (1995) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990127 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990127
83. Jonaitis, A. (1995) A Wealth of Thought: Franz Boas on Native American Art. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
84. Jopling, C., ed. (1971) Art and Aesthetics in Primitive Societies. New York: Dutton.
85. Kaeppler, A.L. (1978) Artificial Curiosities: Being an Exposition of Native Manufactures collected on the Three Pacific Journeys of Captain James Cook at the Bernice Puahi Bishop Museum. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum Press.
86. Kopytoff, I. (1986) The cultural biography of things: commodization as a process, in A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64-91.
87. Kreiger A. The typological concept American Antiquity 9 (1944) 271-88 doi:10.2307/275785 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/275785
88. Kroeber A. On the principle of order in civilization as exemplified by changes of fashion American Anthropologist 21 (3) (1919) 235-63 doi:10.1525/aa.1919.21.3.02a00010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1919.21.3.02a00010
89. Kroeber, A. (1957) Styles and Civilizations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
90. Latour, B. (1992) Where are the missing masses The sociology of a few mundane artifacts, in W.E. Bijker and J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225-58.
91. Lave, J. Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Limited Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Layton, R. (1991) The Anthropology of Art, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Layton R. Intersubjectivity and understanding rock art Australian Archaeologist 51 (2000) 48-53
94. Layton R. Things that signify and things that work: recent studies in material culture Reviews in Anthropology 30 (4) (2001) 325-42 doi:10.1080/00988157.2001.9978290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00988157.2001.9978290
95. Layton R. Art and agency: a reassessment Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 9 (2003) 447-64 doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00158
96. Lechtman, H. (1977) Style in technology: some early thoughts, in H. Lechtman and R. Merrill (eds), Material Culture: Styles, Organization, and Dynamics of Technology. St Paul, MN: American Ethnological Society, pp. 3-20.
97. Lechtman H. Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy Technology and Culture 25 (1) (1984) 1-36 doi:10.2307/3104667 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3104667
98. Lechtman, H. and Merrill, R., eds (1977) Material Culture: Styles, Organization, and Dynamics of Technology. St Paul, MN: American Ethnological Society.
99. Leite, N. (2004) Material Culture: Objects, Trajectories, Value: A Course Proposal. Berkeley, CA: Department of Anthropology, University of California.
100. Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: towards an anthropology of technical systems Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5 (1986) 147-86 doi:10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165%2886%2990012-7
101. Lemonnier P. Topsy-turvy techniques: remarks on the social representation of techniques Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9 (1) (1990) 27-37
102. Lemonnier, P., ed. (1993a) Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic. London and New York: Routledge.
103. Lemonnier, P. (1993b) Introduction, in P. Lemonnier (ed.), Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1-35.
104. Levi-Strauss, C. (1963) Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
105. Lightfoot, K. (2001) Traditions as cultural production: implications for contemporary archaeological research, in T. Pauketat (ed.), The Archaeology of Traditions: Agency and History before and after Columbus. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, pp. 237-52.
106. Longacre, W. (1970) Archaeology as Anthropology: a Case Study. Tucson, AZ, Anthropological Papers 17. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
107. Lorblanchet M. The archaeological significance of palaeolithic pigments in the quercy, France Rock Art Research 7 (1) (1990) 19-20
108. Lorblanchet, M. and Bahn, P., eds (1993) Rock Art Studies: the Post-stylistic Era, or, Where do we go from Here Oxbow Monograph 35. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
109. Lowenthal, D. (1985) The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
110. MacKenzie, M. (1991) Androgynous Objects: String Bags and Gender in Central New Guinea. Chur: Harwood Academic.
111. Marcus, G. and Myers, F., eds (1995) The Traffic in Culture: Refiguring Art and Anthropology. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
112. McCracken, G. (1987) Clothing as language: an object lesson in the study of the expressive properties of material culture, in B. Reynolds and M.A. Stott (eds), Material Anthropology: Contemporary Approaches to Material Culture. Lanham, MD, New York and London: University Press of America, pp. 103-28.
113. McCracken, G. (1988) Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
114. McGuire R. Schiffer M.B. Theory of architectural design Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2 (1983) 277-303 doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90002-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165%2883%2990002-8
115. Mauss M. Les techniques du corps Journal de Psychologie 32 (1935) 271-93
116. Mauss, M. (1967/1925) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. trans. Ian Cunnison. New York: Norton Press.
117. Miller, D., ed. (1998) Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.4324/9780203167014 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203167014
118. Millikan, R.G. (1993) White Queen Psychology and other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
119. Morphy, H. (1991) Ancestral Connections: Art and an Aboriginal System of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
120. Morphy, H. (1994) The anthropology of art, in T. Ingold, (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 648-85.
121. Munn N. Visual categories: an approach to the study of representational systems American Anthropologist 68 (1966) 936-50 doi:10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00050
122. Munn, N. (1973) Walbiri Iconography. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
123. Munro, T. (1963) Evolution in the Arts. Cleveland, OH: Cleveland Museum.
124. Myers, F. (2001) The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
125. Otten, C., ed. (1971a) Anthropology and Art: Readings in Cross-cultural Aesthetics. American Museum Sourcebooks in Anthropology Q13. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
126. Otten, C. (1971b) Introduction, in C. Otten (ed.), Anthropology and Art: Readings in Cross-cultural Aesthetics. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press, pp. xi-xix.
127. Parmentier R.J. The pragmatic semiotics of culture Semiotica 116 (1997) 1-115
128. Pauketat, T., ed. (2001) The Archaeology of Traditions: Agency and History before and after Columbus. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
129. Peirce, C.S. (1955) Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs, in J. Buchler (ed.), The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings. London: Kegan Paul, pp. 89-119.
130. Pfaffenberger B. Fetishized objects and humanized nature: towards an anthropology of technology Man (n.s.) 23 (1988) 236-52
131. Pfaffenberger B. Social anthropology of technology Annual Review of Anthropology 21 (1992) 491-516 doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423
132. Phillips, R.B. and Steiner, C.B., eds (1999) Unpacking Culture: Art and Commodity in Colonial and Post-colonial Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
133. Pinney, C. and Thomas, N. eds (2001) Beyond Aesthetics: Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford: Berg.
134. Plog, S. (1978) Social interaction and stylistic similarity: a reanalysis, in M.B. Schiffer, (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory I. New York: Academic Press, pp. 143-82.
135. Plog S. Analysis of style in artifacts Annual Review of Anthropology 12 (1983) 125-42 doi:10.1146/annurev.an.12.100183.001013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.12.100183.001013
136. Preston, B. (2000) The functions of things: a philosophical perspective on material culture, in P.M. Graves-Brown (ed.), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 22-49.
137. Preucel R. Bauer A. Archaeological pragmatics Norwegian Archaeological Review 34 (2) (2001) 85-96 doi:10.1080/00293650127469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293650127469
138. Price, S. (1989) Primitive Art in Civilized Places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
139. Price, S. Price, R. (1980) Afro-American Arts of the Surinam Rain Forest. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
140. Pye, D. (1982) Six requirements for design, in T. Schlereth, (ed.), Material Culture Studies in America. Nashville, TN: American Association for State and Local History, pp. 153-61.
141. Renne, E.P. (1995) Cloth that Does Not Die: the Meaning of Cloth in Bunu Social Life. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
142. Reynolds B. The relevance of material culture to anthropology Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 14 (2) (1983) 209-17
143. Riggins, S.H., ed. (1994) The Socialness of Things: Essays in the Socio-semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
144. Sackett J. The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model American Antiquity 42 (3) (1977) 369-80 doi:10.2307/279062 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/279062
145. Sackett J. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 (1982) 59-112 doi:10.1016/0278-4165(82)90008-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165%2882%2990008-3
146. Sackett J. Style and ethnicity in the Kahalari: a reply to Wiessner American Antiquity 50 (1) (1985) 154-9 doi:10.2307/280642 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/280642
147. Sauerlender W. From stilus to style: reflection on the fate of a notion Art History 6 (3) (1983) 253-70
148. Schapiro, M. (1953) Style, in A. Kroeber (ed.), Anthropology Today. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 287-312.
149. Schevill, M.B. (1985) Evolution in Textile Design from the Highlands of Guatamala. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
150. Schevill, M.B. (1987) Costume as Communication. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
151. Schevill, M.B. (1992) Maya Textiles of Guatamala. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
152. Schiffer, M. (1992) Technological Perspectives on Behavioral Change. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
153. Schneider J. The anthropology of cloth Annual Review of Anthropology 16 (1987) 409-48 doi:10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002205
154. Schneider, J. Weiner, A. (1986) Cloth and human experience, Current Anthropology, April, pp. 178-84. doi:10.1086/203416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/203416
155. Sieber R. The arts and their changing social function New York Academy of Sciences 96 (2) (1962) 653-8 doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb50154.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb50154.x
156. Sillitoe P. From head-dress to head-messages Man (n.s.) 23 (1988) 298-318
157. Silver H. Ethnoart Annual Review of Anthropology 8 (1979) 267-306 doi:10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.001411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.001411
158. Singer, M. (1978). For a semiotic anthropology, in T.A. Sebeok (ed.), Sight, Sound, and Sense. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
159. Smith-Ferri, S. (1996) Introduction: the human faces of Pomo Indian basketry, in S. Barrett (ed.), Pomo Indian basketry. Berkeley, CA: Hearst Museum of Anthropology, pp. 1-66.
160. Sparshott F. Art and anthropology Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3) (1997) 239-43
161. Spyer, P., ed. (1998) Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Places. New York: Routledge.
162. Stahl A.B. Colonial entanglements and the practices of taste: an alternative to logocentric approaches American Anthropologist 104 (3) (2002) 827-45 doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.827
163. Stanislawski M.B. The ethno-archaeology of Hopi pottery making Plateau 42 (1969) 27-33
164. Stanislawski M.B. Review of William A. Longacre, Archaeology as Anthropology: A Case Study American Antiquity 38 (1973) 117-21 doi:10.2307/279320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/279320
165. Stark, M. (1999) Social dimensions of technical choice in Kalinga ceramic tradition, in E. Chilton, (ed.), Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, pp. 24-43.
166. Sterner J. Who is signalling whom Ceramic style, ethnicity and taphonomy among the Sirak Bulahay Antiquity 63 (1989) 451-9
167. Tedlock B. Tedlock D. Text and textile: language and technology in the art of the Quiche Maya Journal of Anthropological Research 41 (1985) 12147
168. Thomas, N. (1989) Out of Time: History and Evolution in Anthropological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169. Thomas, N. (1991) Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
170. Thomas, N. (1998) Foreword, in A. Gell Art and Agency: An Anthropological Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. vii-xiii.
171. Townsend-Gault C. At the margin or the centre The anthropological study of art Reviews in Anthropology 27 (1998) 425-39 doi:10.1080/00988157.1998.9978212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00988157.1998.9978212
172. Ucko, P. (1969) Penis sheaths: a comparative study, Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute for 1968. London: RAI, pp. 27-67.
173. Van-Wyk, G. (2003) Illuminated signs: style and meaning in the beadwork of Xhosa- and Zulu-speaking peoples, african arts, autumn, pp. 12-33, 93-4.
174. Washburn, D.K. (1977) A Symmetry Analysis of Upper Gila Area Ceramic Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
175. Washburn, D.K., ed. (1983) Structure and Cognition in Art. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
176. Washburn, D.K. Crowe, D.W. (1988) Symmetries of Culture. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
177. Washburn, D.K. and Crowe, D.W. eds (2004) Symmetry Comes of Age: the Role of Pattern in Culture. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
178. Weiner, A. and Schneider, J. eds (1989) Cloth and Human Experience. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
179. Wiessner, P. (1990) Is there Unity to Style? in M.W. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (eds), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105-12.
180. Wilk, R. (1995) Learning to be local in Belize: global systems of common difference, in D. Miller (ed.), Worlds Apart: Modernity through the Prism of the Local. London: Routledge, pp. 110-33.
181. Wilk R. Miss Universe, the Olmec and the valley of Oaxaca Journal of Social Archaeology 4 (1) (2004) 81-98 doi:10.1177/1469605304039851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469605304039851
182. Wobst, M. (1977) Stylistic behavior and information exchange, in C.E. Cleland (ed.), Papers for the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin. Papers of the Museum of Anthropology 61. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, pp. 317-42.
183. Wobst, H.M. (1999) Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style, in E. Chilton (ed.), Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, pp. 118-32.
184. Wolfe A. Social structural basis of art Current Anthropology 10 (1969) 3-44 doi:10.1086/201008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/201008
185. Welfflin, H. (1932) Principles of Art History, 7th edn. London: Bell.