Archaeological Pragmatics

Norwegian Archaeological Review

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 85-96

  Preucel, Robert W ^a   Bauer, Alexander A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17244371075     PISSN: 00293652     EISSN: 15027678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00293650127469     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bauer, A. A., and Preucel, R. W., Archaeology as Semiosis, University of Pennsylvania. n.d.
2. Beaudry, M. C., 1978. Worth its weight in iron:categories of material culture in early Virginia probate inventories. Quarterly Bull. Arch. Soc. Virginia, 33:12–26.
3. Beaudry, M. C., 1988. “Words for things:linguistic analysis of probate inventories”. In Documentary Archaeology in the New World, Edited by:Beaudry, M. C., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
4. Benveniste, E., 1971. “The nature of pronouns”. In Problems in General Linguistics, Edited by:Meek, M. E., Coral Gables, FE:University of Miami Press.
5. Bernstein, R. J., 1985. “Introduction”. In Habermas and Modernity, Edited by:Bernstein, R. J., Cambridge:MIT Press.
6. Binford, L. R., 1983. In Pursuit of the Past, London:Thames and Hudson.
7. Bloch, M., 1991. Language, anthropology and cognitive science. Man, 26:183–198.
8. Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
9. Coles, J., 1979. Experimental Archaeology, New York:Academic Press.
10. Daniel, E. V., 1984. Fluid Signs:Being a Person the Tamil Way, Berkeley:University of California Press.
11. Deetz, J., 1967. invitation to Archaeology, New York:Anchor Books.
12. Derrida, J., 1986. “Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences”. In Critical Theory Since 1965, Edited by:Adams, H., and Searle, L., Tallahassee:University Press of Florida. (1966).
13. Dobres, M.-A., and Robb, J., 2000. “Agency in archaeology:paradigm or platitude?”. In Agency in Archaeology, Edited by:Dobres, M.-A., and Robb, J., London:Routledge.
14. Foucault, M., 1970. The Order of Things:An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York:Vintage Books. (1966).
15. Gardin, J.-C., 1980. Archaeological Constructs, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Habermas, J., 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol I:Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Edited by:McCarthy, T., Vol I, Boston:Beacon Press.
17. Hacking, I., 1996. “The disunities of science”. In The Disunity of Science:Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Edited by:Galison, P., and Stump, D. J., Stanford:St a n ford University Press.
18. Hodder, I., 1982. Symbols in Action:Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
19. Hodder, I., 1984. “Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic”. In Ideology, Power and Prehistory, Edited by:Miller, D., and Tilley, C., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20. Hodder, I., 1986. Reading the Past:Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Hodder, I., 1988. Material culture texts and social change. Proc. Prehistoric Soc., 54:67–75.
22. Hodder, I., ed. 1989a. The Meanings of Things, London:Unwin Hyman.
23. Hodder, I., 1989b. “Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology”. In The Meanings of Things, Edited by:Hodder, I., London:Unwin Hyman.
24. Hodder, I., 1989c. This is not an article about material culture as text. J. Anth. Arch., 8:250–269.
25. Hodder, I., 1990. The Domestication of Europe:Structure and Contingency in Neolithic Societies, Oxford:Blackwell.
26. Hodder, I., 1991. Interpretive archaeology and its role. Amer. Antiquity, 56:7–18.
27. Hodder, I., 1992a. “Material practice, symbolism and ideology”. In Theory and Practice in Archaeology, London:Routledge.
28. Hodder, I., 1992b. Theory and Practice in Archaeology, London:Routledge.
29. Hodder, I., 1999. The Archaeological Process:An Introduction, Oxford:Blackwell.
30. Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Last, J., and Lucas, G., eds. 1995. Interpreting Archaeology:Finding Meaning in the Past, London:Routledge.
31. Jakobson, R., 1960. “Linguistics and poetics”. In Style in Language, Edited by:Sebeok, T. A., Cambridge, MA:M.I.T. Press.
32. Jakobson, R., and Waugh, L., 1979. The Sound Shape of Language, Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
33. Johnsen, H., and Olsen, B., 1992. Hermeneutics and archaeology:on the philosophy of contextual archaeology. Amer. Antiquity, 57:419–436.
34. Kosso, P., 1991. Method in archaeology:middlerange theory as hermeneutics. Amer. Antiquity, 56:621–627.
35. Lee, B., 1997. Talking Heads:Language, Meta-language, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity, Durham:Duke University Press.
36. Lévi-Strauss, C., 1967. Structural Anthropology, Edited by:Jacobson, C., and Schoepf, B. G., Garden City, NY:Doubleday. (1955).
37. Lucas, G., 1995. “Interpretation in contemporary archaeology:some philosophical issues”. In Interpreting Archaeology:Finding Meaning in the Past, Edited by:Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Last, J., and Lucas, G., London:Routledge.
38. Parmentier, R. J., 1994. Signs in Society:Studies in Semiotic Anthropology, Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
39. Parmentier, R. J., 1997. The Pragmatic Semiotics of Cultures. Semiotica, 116:1–115.
40. Patrik, L. E., 1985. “Is there an archaeological record?”. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Edited by:Schiffer, M. B., New York:Academic Press.
41. Peirce, C. S., 1992. The Essential Peirce:Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. I (1867-1893), Edited by:Peirce Edition Project. vol. I, Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
42. Peirce, C. S., 1998. The Essential Peirce:Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2 (1893-1913), Edited by:Peirce Edition Project. vol. 2, Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
43. Preucel, R. W., and Hodder, I., 1996. “Communicating present pasts”. In Contemporary Archaeology in Theory:A Reader, Edited by:Preucel, R. W., and Hodder, I., Oxford:Blackwell.
44. Renfrew, C., 1993. Cognitive archaeology:some thoughts on the archaeology of thought. Cambridge Arch. J., 3:248–250.
45. Renfrew, C., and Bahn, P. G., 1991. Archaeology:Theories, Methods, and Practice, London:Thames and Hudson.
46. Ricoeur, P., 1991. “The model of the text:meaningful act ion considered as text”. In From Text to Action:Essays in Hermeneutics, Evanston:Northwestern University Press. (1971)
47. Saussure, F. de. 1983. Course in General Linguistics, Edited by:Harris, R., London:Duckworth. (1915).
48. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1982. “Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication:are interpretation of Neolithic mort uarypractices”. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Edited by:Hodder, I., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
49. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1987. Re-Constructing Archaeology, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
50. Silverstein, M., 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description”. In Meaning in Anthropology, Edited by:Basso, K., and Selby, H., Albuquerque, NM:Universityof New Mexico Press.
51. Singer, M., 1978. “Fora semiotic anthropology”. In Sight, Sound and Sense, Edited by:Sebeok, T. A., Bloomingon:Indiana University Press.
52. Tedlock, D., and Mannheim, B., eds. 1995. The Dialogic Emergence of Culture, Chicago:University of Illinois Press.
53. Tilley, C., 1991. Material Culture and Text:The Art of Ambiguity, London:Routledge.
54. Tilley, C., ed. 1993. Interpretative Archaeology, Providence:Berg.
55. Tilley, C., 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape:Places, Paths and Monuments, Oxford:Berg.
56. Urban, G., 1986. Linguistic consciousness and allophonic variation:a semiotic perspective. Semiotica, 61:33–59.
57. Urban, G., 1989. “The ’I’ of discourse”. In Semiotics, Self, and Society, Edited by:Lee, B., and Urban, G., Berlin:Moutonde Gruyter.
58. Urban, G., 1991. A Discourse-Centered Approach to Culture, Austin:University of Texas Press.
59. Voloshinov, V. N., 1986. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. (1929).
60. Wylie, A., 1982. “Epistemological issues raised by a structuralist archaeology”. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Edited by:Hodder, I., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
61. Wylie, A., 1989. “The interpretive dilemma”. In Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology:Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology, Edited by:Pinsky, V., and Wylie, A., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
62. Wylie, A., 1992. The Interplay of evidential con strain! sand political interests:recent archaeological work on gender. Amer. Antiquity, 57:15–34.
63. Wylie, A., 1994. On ’capturing facts alive in the past’ (or present):response to Fotiadis and to LittIe. Amer. Antiquity, 59:556–560.
64. Wylie, A., 2000. Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the (dis)union of science. Amer. Antiquity, 65:227–237.
65. Yentsch, A., 1991. “The symbolic divisions of pottery:sex-related attributes of English and Anglo-American household pots”. In The Archaeology of Inequality, Edited by:McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R., Oxford:Blackwell.