Capturing Motion and Depth before Cinematography

Journal of the History of the Neurosciences

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 3-22

  Wade, Nicholas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

optical instruments; precinema; stereoscopic vision; stroboscopic motion

Indexed keywords

ART; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GREAT BRITAIN; HISTORY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; MOTION; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; GREAT BRITAIN; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; MOTION; OPTICAL DEVICES; PHOTOGRAPHY;

EID: 84951068386     PISSN: 0964704X     EISSN: 17445213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964704X.2015.1070029     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Anonymous. (1852): Bulletin dela correspondence. La Lumière 2: 88.
2. Aubert G. (2002): From photography to cinematography: Recording movement and gait in a neurological context. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 11: 255-264.
3. Blundell BG. (2011): 3D displays and spatial interaction: Exploring the science, art, evolution and use of 3D technologies. Auckland, New Zealand, Walker & Wood.
4. Braun M. (1994): Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830-1904). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
5. Brewster D. (1818): Dr. Brewsters patent kaleidoscope. Blackwoods Edinburgh Magazine 3: 121-123.
6. Brewster D. (1831): A Treatise on Optics. London, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Taylor.
7. Brewster D. (1849): Account of a new stereoscope. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Transactions of the Sections: 6-7.
8. Brewster D. (1851): Description of several new and simple stereoscopes for exhibiting, as solids, one or more representations of them on a plane. Transactions of the Royal Scottish Society of Arts 3: 247-259.
9. Brewster D. (1856): The Stereoscope: Its History, Theory, and Construction. London, Murray.
10. Brookman P. (2010): Eadweard Muybridge. London, Tate Publishing.
11. Carpenter WB. (1868a): The zoetrope and its antecedents. The Student and Intellectual Observer of Science, Literature and Art 1: 427-444.
12. Carpenter WB. (1868b): The zoetrope and its antecedents. The Student and Intellectual Observer of Science, Literature and Art 2: 24-31.
13. Claudet A. (1860,. July 22): On the means of increasing the angle of binocular instruments, in order to obtain a stereoscopic effect in proportion to their magnifying power. The Athenæum: Journal of Literature, Science and the Fine Arts,. p. 7.
14. Claudet A. (1865a): On moving photographic figures, illustrating some phenomena of vision connected with the combination of the stereoscope and the phenakistoscope by means of photography. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science: Transactions of the Sections: 9-10.
15. Claudet A. (1865b,. September 15): Moving photographic figures, illustrating some phenomena of vision connected with the combination of the stereoscope and the phenakistoscope by means of photography. The British Journal of Photography, pp. 33-35.
16. Dove HW. (1851): Beschreibung mehrerer Prismenstereoskope und eines einfachen Spiegelstereoskops. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 83: 183-189.
17. Eder JM. (1945): History of Photography, Epstean E, trans. New York, Columbia University Press.
18. Faraday M. (1831): On a peculiar class of optical deception. Journal of the Royal Institution 1: 205-223.
19. Gill AT. (1967): Antoine François Jean Claudet (1797-1867) The Photographic Journal 107: 405-409.
20. Gosser HM. (1977): Selected Attempts at Stereoscopic Moving Pictures and their Relationship to Moving Picture Technology, 1852-1903. New York, Arno Press.
21. Helmholtz H. (1857): Das Telestereoskop. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 101: 494-496.
22. Helmholtz H von. (1896): Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Hamburg, Voss, 2nd edition.
23. Herbert S. (2000): A History of Pre-Cinema. London, Routledge.
24. Horner WG. (1815): New and important combinations with the camera lucida. Annals of Philosophy 6: 281-283.
25. Horner WG. (1819): A new method of solving numerical equations of all orders, by continuous approximation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 109: 308-335.
26. Horner WG. (1832): Natural Magic: A Familiar Exposition of a Forgotten Fact in Optics. Bath, George Wood.
27. Horner WG. (1834a): On the properties of the Dædaleum, a new instrument of optical illusion. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4: 36-41.
28. Horner WG. (1834b): On the autoptic spectrum of certain vessels within the eye, as delineated in shadows on the retina. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4: 262-271.
29. JM. (1821): Account of an optical deception. Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and Art 10: 282-283.
30. Klooswijk AIJ. (1991,. May/June): The first stereo photograph. Stereo World, pp. 6-11.
31. Lowdon G. (1906): George Lowdon, Optician and Scientist, Dundee: Sketch of his Reminiscences and Career. Dundee, Dundee Advertiser.
32. Mannoni L. (2000): The Great Art of Light and Shadow: Archaeology of the Cinema,. Crangle R, trans. and ed. Exeter, University of Exeter Press.
33. Marey É-J. (1873): La Machine Animale: Locomotion Terrestre et Aérienne. Paris, Baillière.
34. Marey É-J. (1879): Animal Mechanism: A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aërial Locomotion. New York, Appleton.
35. Marey É-J. (1895): Movement. New York, Appleton.
36. Matousek O. (1961): J. E. Purkyněs Leben und Tätigkeit im Lichte der Berliner und Prager Archive. Nova Acta Leopoldina 24: 109-129.
37. Muybridge E. (1887): Animal locomotion: An Electro-Photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements, 1872-1885. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
38. Newhall B. (1986): The History of Photography. London, Secker & Warburg.
39. Paris JA. (1827): Philosophy in Sport made Science in Earnest! Being an Attempt to illustrate the First Principles of Natural Philosophy. London, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.
40. Plateau J. (1833): Des illusions sur lesquelles se fonde le petit appareil appelé récemment Phénakisticope. Annales de Chimie et de Physique de Paris 53: 304-308.
41. Purkinje J. (1823): Beobachtungen und Versuche zur Physiologie der Sinne. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Sehens in subjectiver Hinsicht. Prague, Calve.
42. Purkyně JE. (1865): Kinesiskop. In: Rieger FL, Malý J, eds., Riegrův slovník naučný: I-Lžidimitrij. Prague, I. L. Kober, Volume 4.
43. Roget PM. (1825): Explanation of an optical deception in the appearance of the spokes of a wheel seen through vertical apertures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 115: 131-140.
44. Roget PM. (1834): Animal and Vegetable Physiology Considered with Reference to Natural Theology: Bridgewater Treatise V. London, Pickering, Volume 2.
45. Rollmann W. (1853): Zwei neue stereoskopische Methoden. Annalen der Physik 166: 186-187.
46. Stampfer S. (1833): Die stroboskopischen Scheiben oder optische Zauberscheiben, deren Theorie und wissenschaftliche Anwendung. Vienna, Trentsensky & Vieweg.
47. Wade NJ. (1983): Brewster and Wheatstone on vision. London, Academic Press.
48. Wade NJ. (2004): Philosophical instruments and toys: Optical devices extending the art of seeing. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 13: 102-124.
49. Wade NJ. (2011a): Neurognostics question: Science and sense. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 20: 26-28.
50. Wade NJ. (2011b): Neurognostics answer: Science and sense. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 20: 74-79.
51. Wade NJ. (2012): Wheatstone and the origins of moving stereoscopic images. Perception 41: 901-924.
52. Wade NJ. (2013): Faces in perception. Perception 42: 1103-1113.
53. Wade NJ, Brožek J. (2001): Purkinjes Vision: The Dawning of Neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Wade NJ, Heller D. (1997): Scopes of perception: The experimental manipulation of space and time. Psychological Research 60: 227-237.
55. Wade NJ, Ngo TT. (2013): Early views on binocular rivalry. In: Miller SM., ed., The Constitution of Visual Consciousness: Lessons from Binocular Rivalry. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 77-108.
56. Wade NJ, Ono H. (2012): Early studies of binocular and stereoscopic vision. Japanese Psychological Research 54: 54-70.
57. Weaver M. (1986): The Photographic Art: Pictorial Traditions in Britain and America. Edinburgh, Scottish Arts Council.
58. Wheatstone C. (1827): Description of the kaleidophone, or phonic kaleidoscope: A new philosophical toy, for the illustration of several interesting and amusing acoustical and optical phenomena. Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and Art 23: 344-351.
59. Wheatstone CW. (1830): Contributions to the physiology of vision: No I. Journal of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 1: 101-117.
60. Wheatstone C. (1838): Contributions to the physiology of vision-Part the first: On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 128: 371-394.
61. Wheatstone C. (1852): Contributions to the physiology of vision-Part the second: On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 142: 1-17.
62. Young T. (1800): Outline of experiments and enquiries respecting sound and light. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 90: 106-150.
63. Zone R. (2007): Stereoscopic Cinema and the Origins of 3-D Film, 1838-1952. Lexington, University of Kentucky Press.