Early studies of binocular and stereoscopic vision

Japanese Psychological Research

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 54-70

  Wade, Nicholas J ^a   Ono, Hiroshi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Depth perception; Stereoscope; Wheatstone

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857935440     PISSN: 00215368     EISSN: 14685884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00505.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aguilonius, F. (1613). Opticorum libri sex. Philosophis juxta ac mathematicis utiles. Antwerp: Moreti.
2. Alberti, L. B. (1966). On painting. (Trans. by J. R. Spencer), New Haven: Yale University Press. (Original work published (1435). Della pittura. Florence.).
3. Alhazen (1572). Opticae thesaurus. (Trans. and Ed. by F. Risner), Basel: Gallia.
4. d'Almeida, J.-C. (1858). Nouvel appareil stéréoscopique. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 47, 61-63.
5. Arnold, H. J. P. (1977). William Henry Fox Talbot. Pioneer of photography and man of science. London: Hutchinson Benham.
6. Bergua, A., & Skrandies, W. (2000). An early antecedent to modern random dot stereograms -"The secret stereoscopic writing" of Ramón y Cajal. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 69-72.
7. Berkeley, G. (1709). An essay towards a new theory of vision. Dublin: Pepyat.
8. Blagden, C. (1813). An appendix to Mr. Ware's paper on vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 103, 110-113.
9. Blundell, B. (2011). 3D displays and spatial interaction: Exploring the science, art, evolution and use of 3D technologies. Auckland, NZ: Walker & Wood.
10. Boyle, R. (1688). A disquisition about final causes of natural things: Wherein it is inquir'd, whether, and (if at all) with what cautions, a naturalist should admit them? To which is subjoyn'd, by way of Appendix, some uncommon observations about vitiated sight. London: Taylor.
11. Brewster, D. (1830). Optics. Edinburgh encyclopædia. Vol. 15. Edinburgh: Blackwoods, pp. 460-662.
12. Brewster, D. (1844a). On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision, and on the representation of solid figures by the union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 15, 349-368.
13. Brewster, D. (1844b). On the knowledge of distance given by binocular vision. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 15, 663-674.
14. Brewster, D. (1851). Description of several new and simple stereoscopes for exhibiting, as solids, one or more representations of them on a plane. Transactions of the Royal Scottish Society of Arts, 3, 247-259.
15. Brewster, D. (1856). The stereoscope. Its history, theory, and construction. London: John Murray.
16. Brücke, E. (1841). Ueber die stereoskopischen Erscheinungen und Wheatstone's Angriff auf die Lehre von den identischen Stellen der Netzhäute. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin, 5, 459-476.
17. Cajal, S. R. Y. (1901). Recreaciones estereocópicas y binoculares. La Fotografia (Madrid), 27, 41-48.
18. Crone, R. A. (1992). The history of stereoscopy. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 81, 1-16.
19. Desaguliers, J. T. (1716). A plain and easy experiment to confirm Sir Isaac Newton's doctrine of the different refrangibility of the rays of light. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 34, 448-452.
20. Descartes, R. (1965). Discourse on method, optics, geometry, and meteorology. (Trans. by P. J. Olscamp), Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published (1637). Discours de la méthode. Leyden: Maire.).
21. Descartes, R. (1972). Treatise of man. René Descartes. (Trans. & Ed. by T. S. Hall), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published (1664). L'homme. Paris: Angot).
22. Dove, H. W. (1841). Die Combination der Eindrücke beider Ohren und beider Augen zu einem Eindruck. Monatsberichte der Berliner preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 41, 251-252.
23. Dove, H. W. (1851). Beschreibung mehrerer Prismenstereoskope und eines einfachen Spiegelstereoskops. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 83, 183-189.
24. Du Tour, E.-F. (1760). Discussion d'une question d'optique. Académie des Sciences. Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique Présentés pars Divers Savants, 3, 514-530.
25. Du Tour, E.-F. (1761). Addition au mémoire intitulé. Discussion d'une question d'optique. Académie des Sciences. Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique Présentés pars Divers Savants, 4, 499-511.
26. Euclid (1895). Optica. (Ed. by J. L. Heiberg), Leipzig: Teubner.
27. Gill, A. T. (1969). Early stereoscopes. Photographic Journal, 109, 641-651.
28. Helmholtz, H. (1857). Das Telestereoskop. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 101, 494-496.
29. Helmholtz, H. (1867). Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Physik. Vol. 9.Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. (Ed. by G. Karsten), Leipzig: Voss.
30. Hering, E. (1862). Beiträge zur Physiologie. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Engelmann.
31. Howard, I. P. (2002). Seeing in depth. Vol. 1. Basic mechanisms. Toronto, Canada: Porteus.
32. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. (2002). Seeing in depth. Vol. 2. Depth perception. Toronto, Canada: Porteus.
33. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Vol. 2. London: Macmillan.
34. Julesz, B. (1960). Binocular depth perception of computer generated patterns. Bell System Technical Journal, 39, 1125-1162.
35. Klooswijk, A. I. J. (1991). The first stereo photo. Stereo World May/June, 6-11.
36. Kondo, M., Wade, N. J., & Nakamizo, S. (1990). Geometrical analysis of the motion and depth seen in moiré patterns. Bulletin of the Faculty of Literature, Kitakyushu University, 22, 97-114.
37. de La Hire, P. (1694). Dissertation sur les differens accidens de la vue. In F. Boulduc (Ed.), Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique. Paris: Anisson, pp. 233-302.
38. Le Clerc, S. (1679). Discours touchant de point de veue, dans lequel il es prouvé que les chose qu'on voit distinctement, ne sont veues que d'un oeil. Paris: Jolly.
39. Le Clerc, S. (1712). Système de la vision. Paris: Delaulne.
40. LeConte, J. (1881). Sight: An exposition of the principles of monocular and binocular vision. New York: Appleton.
41. LeConte, J. (1897). Sight: An exposition of the principles of monocular and binocular vision. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton.
42. Mayo, H. (1833). Outlines of human physiology. 3rd ed. London: Burgess and Hill.
43. Newton, I. (1704). Optics: Or, a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light. London: Smith and Walford.
44. Ono, H., Lillakas, L., & Wade, N. J. (2007). Seeing double and depth with Wheatstone's stereograms. Perception, 36, 1611-1623.
45. Ono, H., & Wade, N. J. (1985). Resolving discrepant results of the Wheatstone Experiment. Psychological Research, 47, 135-142.
46. Ono, H., & Wade, N. J. (2005). Depth and motion in historical descriptions of motion parallax. Perception, 34, 1263-1273.
47. Ono, H., & Wade, N. J. (2012). Two historical strands in studying visual direction. Japanese Psychological Research, 54, 71-88.
48. Panum, P. L. (1940). Physiological investigations concerning vision with two eyes. (Trans. by C. Hubscher), Hanover, NH: Dartmouth Eye Institute. (Original work published (1858). Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit Zwei Augen. Kiel: Schwerssche Buchhandlung).
49. Porta, J. B. (1593). De refractione. Optices parte. Libri novem. Naples: Salviani.
50. Prévost, A. P. (1843). Essai sur la théorie de la vision binoculaire. Geneva.
51. Rohault, J. (1671). Traité de physique. Paris: Savreux.
52. Ross, W. D. (1931). The works of Aristotle. Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon.
53. Sabra, A. I. (1989). The optics of Ibn al-Haytham. Books I-III. On direct vision. London: The Warburg Institute.
54. Smith, A. M. (1996). Ptolemy's theory of visual perception: An English translation of the Optics with introduction and commentary. Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society.
55. Towne, J. (1862). Remarks on the stereoscopic theory of vision; with observations on the experiments of Professor Wheatstone. Section I. Guy's Hospital Reports, 8, 70-80.
56. Towne, J. (1869). Contributions to the physiology of binocular vision. Section VIII. Guy's Hospital Reports, 14, 54-83.
57. Volkmann, A. W. (1859). Das Tachistoscop, ein Instrument, welches bei Untersuchung des momentanen Sehens den Gebrauch des elektischen Funkens ersetz. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der königlichen sächsischen 2, 90-98.
58. Volpicelli, P. (1876). Scientific worthies. Nature, 13, 501-503.
59. Wade, N. J. (1983). Brewster and Wheatstone on vision. London: Academic Press.
60. Wade, N. J. (1987). On the late invention of the stereoscope. Perception, 16, 785-818.
61. Wade, N. J. (1998). A natural history of vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Wade, N. J. (2004). Philosophical instruments and toys: Optical devices extending the art of seeing. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 13, 102-124.
63. Wade, N. J. (2007). The stereoscopic art of Ludwig Wilding. Perception, 36, 479-482.
64. Wade, N. J., Ono, H., & Lillakas, L. (2001). Leonardo da Vinci's struggles with representations of reality. Leonardo, 34, 231-235.
65. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision - Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 128, 371-394.
66. Wheatstone, C. (1839). Ueber das Sehen mit zwei Augen und das Stereoskop. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 47, 625-627.
67. Wheatstone, C. (1842). Beiträge zur Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes. Erster Teil. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, Supplementary, 1, 1-48.
68. Wheatstone, C. (1852). Contributions to the physiology of vision - Part the second. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 142, 1-17.
69. Young, T. (1807). A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts. London: Johnson.