Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 39-46

  Spinks, Jean ^a   Janda, Monika ^b   Soyer, H Peter ^c   Whitty, Jennifer A ^c  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Health economics; teledermatology; telehealth

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MELANOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROCEDURES; QUEENSLAND; SKIN TUMOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEMEDICINE;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DERMOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MELANOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUEENSLAND; SKIN NEOPLASMS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84950341675     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15586701     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cancer Council of Queensland. Skin cancer – fact sheet, http://www.cancerqld.org.au/icms_docs/61890_Skin_cancer_fact_sheet.pdf (2011, accessed 24 February 2015)
2. Queensland Cancer Registry. Cancer in Queensland: Incidence, mortality, survival and prevelance 1982–2011, Brisbane: Queensland Health and Cancer Council, 2013.
3. Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Working Group. The 2002 national non-melanoma cancer survey, Canberra: Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Working Group, 2003.
4. Cancer Council of Australia. About skin cancer, http://www.cancer.org.au/preventing-cancer/sun-protection/about-skin-cancer.html (2015, accessed 16 March 2015)
5. Whiteman DC, Baade PD and Olsen CM. More people die from thin melanomas (less than 1mm) than from thick melanomas (greater than 4mm) in Queensland, Australia. J Invest Dermatol 2014
6. J.Aitken. Prevalence of whole-body skin self-examination in a population at high risk for skin cancer (Australia). Cancer Causes Control2004; 15: 453–463.
7. Cancer Council of Australia. Checking for signs of skin cancer, http://www.cancer.org.au/preventing-cancer/sun-protection/check-for-signs-of-skin-cancer.html (2015, accessed 25 March 2015)
8. D.WilkinsonD.A.AskewA.Dixon. Skin cancer clinics in Australia: Workload profile and performance indicators from an analysis of billing data. Med J Aust2006; 184: 162–164.
9. C.Massone. Melanoma screening with cellular phones. PLoS One2007; 2: e483–e483.
10. S.Kroemer. Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening: Diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermoscopic image tele-evaluation using cellular phones. Br J Dermatol2011; 164: 973–979.
11. M.N.Manahan. A pilot trial of mobile, patient-performed teledermoscopy. Br J Dermatol2015; 172: 1072–1080.
12. E.Tan. Successful triage of patients referred to a skin lesion clinic using teledermoscopy (IMAGE IT trial). Br J Dermatol2010; 162: 803–811.
13. C.Massone. Teledermatology for skin cancer prevention: An experience on 690 Austrian patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol2014; 28: 1103–1108.
14. Wu X, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of patient-initiated mobile teledermoscopy for short-term monitoring of clinically atypical nevi. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151: 489–496
15. D.Piccolo. Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: A comparative study. Br J Dermatol2002; 147: 481–486.
16. R.S.Azfar. HIV-positive patients in Botswana state that mobile teledermatology is an acceptable method for receiving dermatology care. J Telemed Telecare2011; 17: 338–340.
17. K.CollinsS.WaltersI.Bowns. Patient satisfaction with teledermatology: Quantitative and qualitative results from a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2004; 10: 29–33.
18. G.DemirisS.SpeedieL.Hicks. Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology. J Med Sys2004; 28: 575–579.
19. D.LimA.M.M.OakleyM.Rademaker. Better, sooner, more convenient: A successful teledermoscopy service. Australas J Dermatol2012; 53: 22–25.
20. A.TyagiK.MillerM.Cockburn. e-health tools for targeting and improving melanoma screening: A review. J Skin Cancer2012; 2012: 8–8.
21. M.A.WeinstockF.Q.NguyenP.M.Risica. Patient and referring provider satisfaction with teledermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol2002; 47: 68–72.
22. J.D.Whited. Patient and clinician satisfaction with a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health2004; 10: 422–431.
23. E.W.de Bekker-GrobM.RyanK.Gerard. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Health Econ2012; 21: 145–172.
24. E.LancsarJ.Louviere. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics2008; 26: 661–677.
25. M.Ryan. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ2004; 328: 360–361.
26. J.F.P.Bridges. Conjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: A report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health2011; 14: 403–413.
27. E.M.Warshaw. Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol2011; 64: 759–772, e21.
28. J.D.Whited. Teledermatology research review. Int J Dermatol2006; 45: 220–229.
29. J.M.Rose. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transport Res Part B Methodol2008; 42: 395–406.
30. J.M.RoseM.C.J.Bliemer. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transport Rev2009; 29: 587–617.
31. I.P.LevinG.J.Gaeth. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. J Consumer Res1988; 15: 374–378.
32. K.Train. Discrete choice methods with simulation, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
33. D.A.HensherJ.M.RoseW.H.Greene. Applied choice analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
34. E.LancsarE.Savage. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: nconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ2004; 13: 901–907.
35. M.Ryan. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: A comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). Health Econ2004; 13: 909–912.
36. K.SmallH.Rosen. Applied welfare economics with discrete chocie models. Econometrica1981; 49: 105–130.
37. D.A.Hensher. Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice. Transportation (1986–1998)1994; 21: 107–107.