Introduction

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 5-7

  Engelhard, George ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950301199     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00602.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrich, D. (1978) Relationships between the Thurstone and Rasch approaches to item scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 449–460.
2. Andrich, D. (1985) An elaboration of Guttman scaling with Rasch models for measurement. In N. B. Tuma (Ed) Sociological methodology (pp. 33–80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bashaw, W. L., Bashaw, C. T. (1988) Thelma Thurstone: Career strategies and contributions to measurement. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 12,363–373.
4. Cattell, J. M. (1893) Mental measurement. Philosophical Review, 2, 316–332.
5. Clifford, G. J. (1984) Edward L. Thorndike: The same positivist. Middleton, CT Wesleyan University Press.
6. Cronbach, L. J., Linn, R. L., Brennan, R. L., & Haertel, E. (1997) Generalizability analysis for performance assessments of student achievement or school effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 373–399.
7. Dubois, P. H. (1970) A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Engelhard, G. (1984) Thorndike, Thurstone and Rasch: A comparison of their methods of scaling psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 21–38.
9. Engelhard, G. (1991) Thorndike and Wood. Rasch Measurement Transactions,5 (2), 146.
10. Engelhard, G. (1992) Historical views of invariance: Evidence from the measurement theories of Thorndike, Thurstone and Rasch. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(2), 275–292.
11. Engelhard, G. (1994) Historical views of the concept of invariance in measurement theory. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, Vol. 2 (pp. 73–99). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Gould, S. J. (1981) The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
13. Linden, K. W., & Linden, J. O. (1968) Modern mental measurement: A historical perspective. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
14. Porter, T. M. (1986) The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Saretzky, G. D. (1989) A guide to the Ben D. Wood papers. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16. Seagoe, M. V. (1975) Terman and the gifted. Los Altos, CA William Kaufman.
17. Sokal, M. M. (1984, Fall). Approaches to the history of psychological testing. History of Education Quarterly,419–430.
18. Sokal, M. M. (1987) James McKeen Cattell and mental anthropometry: Nineteenth-century science and re form and the origins of psychological testing. In M. M. Sokal (Ed.), Psychological testing and American society, 18901930 (pp. 2145). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19. Stigler, S. M. (1986) The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
20. Terman, L. M. (1916) Measuring intelligence. New York Houghton-Mifflin.
21. Thorndike, E. L. (1919) An introduction to the theory of mental and social measurements. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
22. Urban, W. J. (1989) The black scholar and intelligence testing: The case of Horace Mann Bond. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 25, 323–334.
23. Wood, B. D. (1923) Measurement in higher education. Yonkers on Hudson, New York: World Book Co.
24. Wright, B. D. (1980) Foreword. In G. Rasch, Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.