Public anonymity and the connected world

Ethics and Information Technology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 207-218

  Doyle, Tony ^a   Veranas, Judy ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Autonomy; CCTV; GPS devices; Privacy; Terrorism

Indexed keywords

CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEMS; DATA PRIVACY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; TERRORISM;

ANONYMITY; AUTONOMY; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; HIGHWAY TOLLS;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 84906949638     PISSN: 13881957     EISSN: 15728439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10676-014-9346-5     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen, A. (2011). Unpopular privacy: What must we hide?. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Barbaro, M., and Zeller Jr., T. (2006). A face is exposed for AOL searcher no. 4417749. New York Times, p. A1.
3. Bateson, M., et al. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412-414.
4. Bomarito, J. (2006). Scott, Sir Walter (1771-1832). Gothic literature: A Gale critical companion. In J. Bomarito (Ed.), Vol. 3: L-Z. Detroit: Gale, pp 289-317.
5. Chapman, C., & Harris, A. (2002). A skeptical look at September 11. Skeptical Inquirer, 26(5), 29-34.
6. Cohen, J. (1995). Right to read anonymously: A closer look at copyright management in cyberspace. Connecticut Law Review, 28, 981-1058.
7. Cohen, J. (2008). Privacy, visibility, transparency, and exposure. University of Chicago Law Review, 181-201.
8. de Montjoye, Y-A., et al. (2013). Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Nature: Scientific Reports. 31376. Retrieved from http://www. nature. com/srep/2013/130325/srep01376/full/srep01376. html. Accessed 2 April 2014.
9. The End of Privacy. (1999). Economist, 351(8117), 15-16.
10. Farmer, D. and C. Mann. (2003). Surveillance nation. MIT Technology Review (April), 36-43. http://www. technologyreview. com/featuredstory/401863/surveillance- nation/. Accessed 7 March 2013.
11. Feinberg, J. (1984). The moral limits of criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Goold, B. (2002). Privacy rights and public spaces: CCTV and the problem of the "unobservable observer". Criminal Justice Ethics, 21(1), 21-27.
13. Goold, B. (2006). Open to all? Regulating open street CCTV and the case for "symmetrical surveillance". Criminal Justice Ethics, 25(1), 3-17.
14. Goold, B. (2008). The difference between lonely old ladies and CCTV cameras: A response to Ryberg. Res Publica, 14(1), 43-47.
15. Hersent, O., et al. (2012). The internet of things: Key applications and protocols. New York: Wiley.
16. Legal Terms (2013). Facebook. Retrieved from http://www. facebook. com/legal/terms Accessed 2 April 2014.
17. Mathiesen, K. (2013). The Internet, children and privacy: The case against parental monitoring. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(4), 263-274.
18. Matthews, S. (2010). Anonymity and the social self. American Philosophical Quarterly, 47(4), 351-363.
19. Moor, J. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. Computers and Society, 27(3), 27-32.
20. National Vital Statistics Report (2003). 51(5). Retrieved from http://www. cdc. gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr51_05. pdf. Accessed 2 April 2014.
21. National Vital Statistics Report (2012). 61(6). Retrieved from www. cdc. gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_06. pdf. Accessed 2 April 2014.
22. Nissenbaum, H. (1997). Toward an approach to privacy in public: Challenges of information technology. Ethics and Behavior, 7(3), 207-219.
23. Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17(5-6), 559-596.
24. Nissenbaum, H. (1999). The meaning of anonymity in an information age. The Information Society, 15(2), 141-144.
25. Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119-157.
26. Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford Law.
27. Norris, C., & Armstrong, G. (1999). CCTV and the social structuring of surveillance. Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 157-178.
28. Patton, J. (2000). Protecting privacy in public? Surveillance technologies and the value of public places. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 181-187.
29. Posner, R. (1984). An economic theory of privacy. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy (pp. 333-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (originally published in 1978).
30. Posner, R. (2006). Not a suicide pact: The constitution in a time of national emergency. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Posner, R. (2008). Privacy, surveillance, and law. University of Chicago Law Review, 245-260.
32. Postman, N. (1999). Building a bridge to the 21st century. New York: Vintage.
33. Regan, P. (1995). Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
34. Reiman, J. (2004). Driving to the panopticon: A philosophical exploration of the risks to privacy posed by the information technology of the future. In B. Rössler (Ed.), Privacies: Philosophical evaluations (pp. 194-241). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
35. Richards, N. (2013). The dangers of surveillance. Harvard Law Review, 126, 1934-1962.
36. Rule, J. (2007). Privacy in peril. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Ryberg, J. (2007). Privacy rights, crime prevention, CCTV, and the life of Mrs. Aremac. Res Publica, 13, 127-143.
38. Schneier, B. (2003). Beyond fear: Thinking sensibly about security in an uncertain world. New York: Copernicus Books.
39. Schneier, B. (2009). Beyond security theatre. New Internationalist, 427, 10-12.
40. Schneier, B. (2012). Liars and outliers: enabling the trust that society needs to thrive. Indianapolis: John Wiley and Sons.
41. Smithson, M. (2003). Private lives, public spaces: The surveillance state. Dissent (Winter), 43-49.
42. Solove, D. (2004). The digital person. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Solove, D. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44. Solove, D. (2011). Nothing to hide. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45. State of Massachussetts. Department of Revenue. (2012). "Commuter deduction worksheet example". Guide to Personal Income Tax: Forms, Schedules, and Worksheets. Massachusetts Department of Revenue. Retrieved from http://www. mass. gov/dor/individuals/filing-and-payment-information/guide-to-personal-income-tax/forms-schedules-and-worksheets/worksheet-examples/commuter-deduction-worksheet-example. html. Accessed 2 April 2014.
46. Strandburg, K. (2010). Home, home on the web and other fourth amendment implications of technosocial change. Maryland Law Review, 70, 614-680.
47. Talbot, D. (2012). A phone that knows where you're going. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www. technologyreview. com/news/428441/a-phone-that-knows-where-youre-going. Accessed 2 April 2014.
48. Taylor, J. (2002). Privacy and autonomy: A reappraisal. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 40(4), 587-604.
49. Uckelman, D., et al. (2011). An architectural approach towards the future internet of things. In D. Uckelman, et al. (Eds.), Architecting the internet of things (pp. 1-24). New York: Springer.
50. Wallace, K. (1999). Anonymity. Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 23-35.
51. Wallace, K. (2008). Online anonymity. In K. Himma & H. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook or information and computer ethics. New York: Wiley.
52. Zimmer, M. (2005). Surveillance, privacy and the ethics of vehicle safety communication technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 201-210.
53. Zimmer, M. (2010). "But the data is already public": On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 313-325.