GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and certainty factor (CF) models for the Baozhong region of Baoji City, China

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-14

  Chen, Wei ^a   Li, Wenping ^b   Chai, Huichan ^b   Hou, Enke ^a   Li, Xiaoqin ^b   Ding, Xiao ^a  

^a XI'AN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b CHINA UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Certainty factor (CF) model; China; Geographic information system (GIS); Landslide; Susceptibility mapping

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; LITHOLOGY; MAPPING;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; AREAS UNDER THE CURVES; CERTAINTY FACTORS; CHINA; LANDSLIDE INVENTORIES; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING;

LANDSLIDES;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LANDSLIDE; MAPPING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

BAOJI; CHINA; SHAANXI;

EID: 84950259146     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-4795-7     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at İzmir, Turkey. Landslides 9:93–106
2. Akgun A, Turk N (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) 379 and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ Earth Sci 61(3):595–611
3. Baeza C, Corominas J (2001) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques. Earth Surf Proc Landf 26:1251–1263
4. Bai S, Lu G, Wang J, Zhou P, Ding L (2010) GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China. Environ Earth Sci 62(1):139–149
5. Binaghi E, Luzi L, Madella P, Rampini A (1998) Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster-Shafer approaches. Nat Hazards 17:77–97
6. Chauhan S, Sharma M, Arora M, Gupta N (2010) Landslide susceptibility zonation through ratings derived from artificial neural network. Intl J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf 12:340–350
7. Choi J, Oh HJ, Lee HJ, Lee C, Lee S (2012) Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS. Eng Geol 124:12–23
8. Chung CF, Fabbri AG, van Westen CJ (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. In: Carrera A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 107–133
9. Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Omar F, Althuwaynee (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65:135–165
10. Einstein HH (1988) Special lecture: landslides risk assessment procedure. In: Proceedings of 5th symposium on landslides, Lausanne, vol 2, pp 1075–1090
11. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relation to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75:229–250
12. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, van Asch TWJ (2004) Landslide susceptibility zoning north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 32:1–23
13. Felicisimo A, Cuartero A, Remondo J, Quiros E (2013) Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides 10:175–189
14. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102:85–98
15. Foumelis M, Lekkas E, Parcharidis I (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping by GIS-based qualitative weighting procedure in Corinth area. Bull Geol Soc Greece XXXVI:904–912
16. Hasekiogullar GD, Ercanoglu M (2012) A new approach to use AHP in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Yenice (Karabuk, NW Turkey). Nat Hazards 63:1157–1179
17. Helmi ZMS, Izni MZ, Zahidi Shamsul AB (2010) Development of landslide susceptibility map utilizing remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS). Int J Disaster Prev Manag 1:59–69
18. Kincal C, Akgun A, Koca MY (2009) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Izmir (WestAnatolia, Turkey) city center and its near vicinity by the logistic regression method. Environ Earth Sci 59:745–756
19. Kundu S, Saha AK, Sharma DC, Pant CC (2013) Remote sensing and GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment using binary logistic regression model: a case study in the Ganeshganga Watershed, Himalayas. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41(3):697–709
20. Lan HX, Zhou CH, Wang LJ, Zhang HY, Li RH (2004) Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GIS in the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan, China. Eng Geol 76:109–128
21. Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26:1477–1491
22. Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analyses of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113
23. Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping: using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302
24. Marjanović M, Kovačević M, Bajat B, Voženílek V (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Eng Geol 123:225–234
25. Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of turkey). Geomorphology 94(3–4):401–418
26. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2012a) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci 6:2351–2365
27. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012b) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63(2):965–996
28. Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Fatemi Aghda SM (2013a) Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazards 69:749–779
29. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Deylami MK (2013b) A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 4(2):93–118
30. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2013c) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed. Iran Arab J Geosci 6:2351–2365
31. Pouydal CP, Chang C, Oh HJ, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci 61:1049–1064
32. Pradhan B (2010a) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45:1244–1256
33. Pradhan B (2010b) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(2):301–320
34. Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365
35. Pradhan B, Buchroithner MF (2010) Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosci 16(2):107–126
36. Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. Int J Phys Sci 3(11):1–15
37. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci 60(5):1037–1054
38. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back-propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modeling. Environ Modell Softw 25(6):747–759
39. Pradhan B, Pirasteh S (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Adv 3(2):26–34
40. Pradhan B, Oh HJ, Buchroithner M (2010) Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 1(3):199–223
41. Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115:172–187
42. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York
43. Saaty TL (2000) The fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process, vol VI, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pitsburg
44. Saha AK, Gupta RP, Sarkar I, Arora MK, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2:61–69
45. Soeters R, van Westen CJ (1996) Slope stability recognition analysis and zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, transportation research board special report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 129–177
46. Solaimani K, Seyedeh ZM, Ataollah K (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arab J Geosci 6:2557–2569
47. Soyoung P, Chuluong C, Byungwoo K, Jinsoo K (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68:1443–1464
48. Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679
49. Thanh LN, De Smedt F (2012) Application of an analytical hierarchical process approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in A Luoi district, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. Environ Earth Sci 66:1739–1752
50. Wieczorek GF (1984) Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. As Eng Geol Bull 21(3):337–342
51. Xu C, Dai FC, Xu X, Lee YH (2012a) GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China. Geomorphology 145–146:70–80
52. Xu C, Xu XW, Dai FC, Saraf Arun K (2012b) Comparison of different models for susceptibility mapping of earthquake triggered landslides related with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Comput Geosci 46:317–329
53. Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Anderson (Turkey): comparision of results and confirmations. Catena 1:1–12
54. Yalcin A, Bulut F (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Nat Hazards 41:201–226
55. Yalcin A, Reis S, Cagdasoglu A, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85:274–287
56. Yilmaz I (2009a) A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68(3):297–306
57. Yilmaz I (2009b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6):1125–1138
58. Yilmaz I (2010a) The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability (CP) and artificial neural network (ANN). Environ Earth Sci 60:505–519
59. Yilmaz I (2010b) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61:821–836
60. Zarea M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci 6:2873–2888