Computer assisted learning: Perceptions and knowledge skills of undergraduate medical students in a malaysian medical school

National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 63-67

  Govindaraja, Chitra ^a   Jai Prakash, Heethal ^a   Annamalai, Chandramouli ^b   Vedhavathy, Sharmila Sornam ^a  

^a MAHSA Universi ty   (Malaysia)

^b University Teknologi MARA (UiTM)   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Benefits; Knowledge; Obligation; Perceptions; Pharmacology; Record computer assisted learning; Simulated experiments; Thesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETERS; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIMULATION;

EID: 84950170709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22313206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Sewell RDE, Stevens RG, Lewis DJA. Pharmacology Experimental Benefits from the Use of Computer - Assisted Learning. Am JPharmEdu 1996;60: 304-307.
2. Dahanukar SA. Practical programme for MBBS students. Indian J Pharmacol 1999;31: 380-2.
3. Hummel T, Lotsch J, Brune K, Kobal G. Computer-assisted teaching in pharmacology. ALTEX: Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten 1993; 10: 45-60.
4. Kuruvilla A, Ramalingam S, Bose AC, Shastri GV, Bhuvanseshwaari K, Amudha G. Use of Computer Assisted Learning as an Adjuvant to Practical Pharmacology Teaching: Advantages and Limitations. Indian J Pharmacol 2001;33:272-275.
5. Hughes I. Changes in use of technological methods of teaching and learning in undergraduate pharmacology in UK Higher Education. BEE-j. 2003;l:l(s).
6. Dewhurst D. Computer-based alternatives to using animals in teaching physiology and pharmacology to undergraduate students. Altern Lab Anim 2004;32:17-520.
7. Sharma R, Verma U, Kapoor B, Chopra VS. Novel Teaching Approaches in Pharmacology. Pharm J Med Edu & Res 2004;6:172-173.
8. Chandragouda RP. Multimedia software for demonstrating animal experiments in pharmacology. AATEX Journal. 2007;14:329-332.
9. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. 2001. BMJ 2001;322:40-44.
10. Moss S. Computer technology in education. Pharm J 1993;251:491.
11. Leathard HL, Dewhurst DG. Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of a computer assisted learning program with a tutored demonstration to teach intestinal motility to medical students. ALT-J 1995,3:118-125.
12. Baby LT, Kavalakkat JC, Abraham S, Sathianarayanan S. CAL: A Modern Tool for Pharmacology. Internet J of Medical Simulation 2009;2(2).
13. awver AL, Branch CE, Trentham L, Robertson BT, Beckett SD. A comparison of interactive videodisc instruction with live animal laboratories. Am J Physiol 1990;259:511-4.
14. Hansen LA, Boss GR. Use of live animals in the curricula of U. S. medical schools: survey results from 2001. Acad Med 2002;77:1147-1149.