Chapter 15. Archaeology is anthropology

Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 155-169

  Gillespie, Susan D ^a   Joyce, Rosemary A ^b   Nichols, Deborah L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950140651     PISSN: 1551823X     EISSN: 15518248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/ap3a.2003.13.1.155     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allison, Penelope, ed. 1999 The Archaeology of Household Activities. London: Routledge.
2. Binford, Lewis R., 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28: 217-225.
3. Binford, Lewis R., 1981 Behavioural Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”. Journal of Anthropological Research 37: 195-208.
4. Bloch, Maurice., 2001 The Ethnohistory of Madagascar. Ethnohistory 48: 293-299.
5. Borofsky, Robert., 2002 The Four Subfields: Anthropologists as Myth-makers. American Anthropologist 104: 463-480.
6. Boyd, M., J. C.Erwin, and M.Hendrickson, eds. 2000 The Entangled Past: Integrating History and Archaeology. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Chacmool Archaeological Conference. Calgary, Alberta: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
7. Clark, J. Grahame., 1957 Archaeology and Society: Reconstructing the Prehistoric Past. 3rd ed., London: Methuen.
8. Deetz, James F., 1972 Archaeology as a Social Science. InContemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. M. P.Leone, ed. Pp. 108-117. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
9. Deetz, James F., 1988 History and Archaeological Theory: Walter Taylor Revisited. American Antiquity 53: 13-22.
10. Dixon, R. B., 1913 Some Aspects of North American Archaeology. American Anthropologist 15: 549-577.
11. Dunnell, Robert C., 1982 Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38: 1-25.
12. Ferrie, Helke., 2001 An Interview with Richard S. MacNeish. Current Anthropology 42: 715-735.
13. Flannery, Kent V., 1967 Culture History versus Cultural Process: A Debate in American Archaeology. Scientific American 217: 119-122.
14. Flannery, Kent V., 1982 The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist 84: 265-278.
15. Flannery, Kent V., 1983 Archaeology and Ethnology in the Context of Divergent Evolution. InThe Cloud People: Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec Civilizations. K. V.Flannery and J.Marcus, eds. Pp. 361-362. New York: Academic.
16. Givens, David., and Susan, Skomal., 1993 The Four Subfields: Myth and Reality. Anthropology Newsletter 34(5): 1-19.
17. Gosden, Chris., 1999 Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship. London: Routledge.
18. Graves, Michael W., 1994 New Directions in Americanist Archaeology. American Antiquity 59: 5-8.
19. Green, Roger C., 2000 Trigger’s Holistic Archaeology and Pacific Culture History. InThe Entangled Past: Integrating History and Archaeology. M.Boyd, J. C.Erwin, and M.Hendrickson, eds. Pp. 127-137. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Chacmool Archaeological Conference. Calgary, Alberta: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
20. Groube, L. M. 1977 The Hazards of Anthropology. InArchaeology and Anthropology: Areas of Mutual Interest. M. Spriggs., ed. Pp. 69-90. BAR Supplementary Series, 19. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
21. Gumerman, George J., 2002 Letter to the Editor. The SAA Archaeological Record 2(4): 3.
22. Gumerman, George J., and David A.Phillips, Jr. 1978 Archaeology Beyond Anthropology. American Antiquity 43: 184-191.
23. Haselgrove, Colin 1977 After Civilization: Archaeology, Anthropology and the Study of Urbanism. InArchaeology and Anthropology: Areas of Mutual Interest. M. Spriggs., ed. Pp. 91-115. BAR Supplementary Series, 19. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
24. Kluckhohn, Clyde., 1940 The Conceptual Structure in Middle American Studies. InThe Maya and Their Neighbors: Essays on Middle American Anthropology and Archaeology. C. L.Hay, R. L.Linton, S. K.Lothrop, H. L.Shapiro, and G. C.Vaillant, eds. Pp. 41-51. New York: Appleton-Century.
25. Knapp, A. Bernard., 1996 Archaeology Without Gravity: Postmodernism and the Past. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 127-158.
26. Kroeber, Alfred L., 1935 History and Science in Anthropology. American Anthropologist 37: 539-569.
27. Larsen, Clark Spencer., 2002 The Tomb Is Still Empty: 30 Years Back and 30 Years Ahead in Physical Anthropology. Anthropology News 43(2): 4-5.
28. Leach, Edmund., 1973 Concluding Address. InThe Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. C.Renfrew, ed.Pp. 761-771. London: Duckworth.
29. Leach, Edmund., 1977 A View from the Bridge. InArchaeology and Anthropology: Areas of Mutual Interest. M.Spriggs, ed.Pp. 161-176. BAR Supplementary Series, 19. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
30. Hodder, Ian., 2001 Introduction: A Review of Contemporary Theoretical Debates in Archaeology. InArchaeological Theory Today. I.Hodder, ed. Pp. 1-13. Cambridge: Polity.
31. Ingold, Tim., 1992 Editorial. Man 27: 693-696.
32. Kelly, Robert L., 2002a American Archaeology in 30 Years. Anthropology News 43(1): 4.
33. Kelly, Robert L., 2002b Counterpoint: Archaeology Is Anthropology. The SAA Archaeological Record 2(3): 13-14.
34. Kirch, Patrick V., and Marshall, Sahlins., 1992 Anahulu: The Anthropology of History in the Kingdom of Hawaii. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Lees, Susan., 2002 Counterpoint: Separation versus a Larger Vision. The SAA Archaeological Record 2(3): 11-12.
36. Meggers, Betty J., 1955 The Coming of Age of American Archaeology. InNew Interpretations of Aboriginal American Culture History. B. J.Meggers and C.Evans, eds. Pp. 116-129. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.
37. Meskell, Lynn., 2002 The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 279-301.
38. Moore, Lawrence E., 2001 The Misplaced Trowel. North American Archaeologist 22: 387-402.
39. Ortner, Sherry B., 2001 Commentary: Practice, Power and the Past. Journal of Social Archaeology 1.271-275.
40. Patterson, Thomas C., 1999 The Political Economy of Archaeology in the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 155-174.
41. Phillips, Philip., 1955 American Archaeology and General Anthropological Theory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11: 246-250.
42. Renfrew, Colin., 1978 Space, Time and Polity. InThe Evolution of Social Systems. J.Friedman and M. J.Rowlands, eds. Pp. 89-112. London: Duckworth.
43. Schiffer, Michael Brian., 2000 Social Theory in Archaeology: Building Bridges. InSocial Theory in Archaeology. M. B.Schiffer, ed. Pp. 1-13. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
44. Schmidt, Peter, and Thomas C.Patterson, eds. 1996 Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
45. Service, Elman R., 1964 Archaeological Theory and Ethnological Fact. InProcess and Pattern in Culture: Essays in Honor of Julian H. Steward. R. A.Manners, ed. Pp. 364-375. Chicago: Aldine.
46. Smith, Bruce D., 2001 The Transition to Food Production. InArchaeology at the Millennium: A Sourcebook. G. M.Feinman and T. D.Price, eds. Pp. 199-230. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
47. Spriggs, Matthew 1977 Introduction-Where the Hell Are We? (Or a Young Man’s Quest). InArchaeology and Anthropology: Areas of Mutual Interest. M. Spriggs., ed. Pp. 3-17. BAR Supplementary Series, 19. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
48. Steward, Julian., 1942 The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology. American Antiquity 7: 337-343.
49. Steward, Julian., 1949 Cultural Causality and Law: A Trial Formulation of the Development of Early ivilizations. American Anthropologist 51: 1-27.
50. Strong, William Duncan., 1936 Anthropological Theory and Archaeological Fact. InEssays in Anthropology (Presented to A. L. Kroeber in Celebration of His Sixtieth Birthday). R. H.Lowie, ed. Pp. 359-370. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. Strong, William Duncan., 1952 The Value of Archaeology in the Training of Professional Anthropologists. American Anthropologist 54: 318-321.
52. Taylor, Walter W., 1948 A Study of Archaeology. American Anthropological Association Memoir 69, pp. 5-263. Menasha, WS.
53. Taylor, Walter W., 1983[1948]A Study of Archeology [sic]. Center for Archaeological Investigations. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
54. Trigger, Bruce G., 1989 A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Trigger, Bruce G., 1991 Constraint and Freedom: A New Synthesis for Archeological Explanation. American Anthropologist 93: 551-569.
56. Van Der Leeuw, Sander E., and Charles L. Redman., 2002 Placing Archaeology at the Center of Socio-Natu-ral Studies. American Antiquity 67: 597-605.
57. Watson, Patty Jo., 1995 Archaeology, Anthropology, and the Culture Concept. American Anthropologist 97: 683-694.
58. Willey, Gordon R., and Philip, Phillips., 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Wiseman, James., 1980a Archaeology as Archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology 7: 149-151.
60. Wiseman, James., 1980b Archaeology in the Future: An Evolving Discipline. American Journal of Archaeology 84: 279-285.
61. Wiseman, James., 1983 Conflicts in Archaeology: Education and Practice. Journal of Field Archaeology 10: 1-9.
62. Wiseman, James., 1998 Reforming Academia. Archaeology 51(5): 27-30.
63. Wiseman, James., 2001 Declaration of Independence. Archaeology 54(4): 10-12.
64. Wiseman, James., 2002 Point: Archaeology as an Academic Discipline. The SAA Archaeological Record 2(3): 8-10.
65. Wobst, H. M., 1978 The Archaeo-ethnology of Hunter-Gatherers or the Tyranny of the Ethnographic Record in Archaeology. American Antiquity 43: 303-309.
66. Wolf, Eric R., 1990 Facing Power-Old Insights, New Questions. American Anthropologist 92: 586-596.