Archaeology without gravity: postmodernism and the past

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 127-158

  Bernard Knapp, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Modernism; Postmodernism; Postprocessualism; Social interpretive archaeology

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544289394     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02232772     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Alcoff, L. (1988). Poststructuralism and cultural feminism. Signs 13(3): 4-36.
2. Appadurai, A. (ed.) (1986). The Social Life of Things, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Barrett, J. C. (1988). Fields of discourse: reconstituting a social archaeology. Critique of Anthropology 7(3): 5-16.
4. Barrett, J. C. (1994a). Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC, Blackwell, Oxford.
5. Barrett, J. C. (1994b). Postmodern creationists? Posting on Arch-Theory bulletin board (arch-theory@mailbase.ac.uk), 23 Nov. (text in author's files).
6. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations, Semiotext(e), New York.
7. Bender, B. (1993). Cognitive archaeology and cultural materialism. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3: 257-260.
8. Benhabib, S. (1994). Feminism and the question of postmodernism. Polity Reader in Gender Studies, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 76-92.
9. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming Reality, Verso, London.
10. Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28: 217-225.
11. Binford, L. R. (1977). For Theory Building in Archaeology, Seminar Press, New York.
12. Bintliff, J. L. (1991). Post-modernism, rhetoric and scholasticism at TAG: the current state of British archaeological theory. Antiquity 65(247): 274-278.
13. Bintliff, J. L. (1993). Why Indiana Jones is smarter than the post-processualists. Norwegian Archaeological Review 26: 91-100.
14. Boyne, R. (1990). Foucault and Derrida: The Other Side of Reason, Unwin Hyman, London.
15. Bordo, S. (1990). Feminism, postmodernism, and gender-scepticism. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 133-156.
16. Brumfiel, E. M. (1992). Breaking and entering the ecosystem-Gender, class, and faction steal the show. American Anthropologist 94: 551-567.
17. Bruner, E. M. (1994). Abraham Lincoln as authentic reproduction: A critique of postmodernism. American Anthropologist 96: 397-415.
18. Burgin, V. (1986). The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity, Macmillan, London.
19. Burke, P. (ed.) (1991). New Perspectives on Historical Writing, Polity Press, Cambridge.
20. Burr, G. (1990). The joker is wild, the text untameable: The analytics of homo analogicus (anthropology, post-structuralism, and post modernism). In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds), Archaeology After Structuralism, Routledge, London, pp. 35-59.
21. Callinicos, A. (1989). Against Post Modernism, Polity Press, Cambridge.
22. Carr, E. H. (1961). What Is History? Pelican, Harmondsworth.
23. Carrian, T., Connell, R. W., and Lee, J. (1985). Towards a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society 14: 551-603.
24. Cherry, J. F. (1987). Power in space: Archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In Wagstaff, J. M. (ed.), Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives, Blackwell, London, pp. 146-172.
25. Christian, B. (1988). The race for theory. Feminist Studies 14: 67-69.
26. Clarke, D. L. (1978). Analytical Archaeology, 2nd ed., Columbia University Press, New York.
27. Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The Idea of History, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
28. Conkey, M. W., with Williams, S. H. (1991). Original narratives: the political economy of gender in archaeology. In di Leonardo, M. (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 102-139.
29. Cowgill, G. L. (1993). Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing the New Archaeology. American Anthropologist 95: 551-573.
30. Daniel, G. (1981). A Short History of Archaeology, Thames and Hudson, London.
31. Daniels, S., and Cosgrove, D. E. (1988). Introduction: iconography and landscape. In Cosgrove, D. E., and Daniels, S., (eds.), The Iconography of Landscape Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-10.
32. Davis, W. (1992). The deconstruction of intentionality in archaeology. Antiquity 66(251): 334-347.
33. Derrida, J. (1981). Positions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
34. di Leonardo, M. (ed.) (1991). Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley.
35. Dobres, M.-A., and Huffman, C. R. (1994). Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(3): 211-258.
36. Dyson, S. L. (1982). Archaeological survey in the Mediterranean basin: A review of recent research. American Antiquity 47: 87-98.
37. Dyson, S. L. (1993). From New to New Age archaeology: archaeological theory and classical archaeology-a 1990s perspective. American Journal of Archaeology 97: 195-206.
38. Earle, T. K., and Preucel, R. (1987). Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology 28: 501-538.
39. Eco, U. (1987). Travels in Hyperreality, Picador, London.
40. Engelstad, E. (1991). Images of power and contradiction: feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity 65(248): 502-514.
41. Featherstone, M. (1988) In pursuit of the postmodernism: an introduction. Theory, Culture and Society 5: 195-217.
42. Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs 12: 621-643.
43. Flax, J. (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 39-62.
44. Fokkema, D., and H. Bertens (eds) (1986). Approaching Postmodernism, John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
45. Fotiadis, M. (1994). What is archaeology's "mitigated objectivism" mitigated by? Comments on Wylie. American Antiquity 59: 545-555.
46. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge-Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, Harvester Press, Brighton.
47. Fraser, N., and Nicholson, L. J. (1990) Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 19-38.
48. Friedman, J. (1992). The past in the future: History and the politics of identity. American Anthropologist 94: 837-859.
49. Gamble, C (1986). Hunter-gatherer studies and the origin of states. In Hall, J. A. (ed.), States in History, Blackwell, London, pp. 22-47.
50. Gamble, C (1993) Ancestors and agendas. In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), Archaeological Theory-Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 39-52.
51. Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.) (1990). The Politics of the Past, One World Archaeology 12, Routledge, London and New York.
52. Gellner, E. (1992). Postmodernism, Reason, and Religion, Routledge, London and New York.
53. Gero, J., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.) (1991). Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
54. Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, University of California Press, Berkeley.
55. Gill, D. W. J., and Chippendale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figurines. American Journal of Archaeology 97: 601-659.
56. Gitlin, T. (1989). Postmodernism: Roots and politics. In Angus, I., and Jhally, S. (eds), Cultural Politics in Contemporary America, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 347-360.
57. Glock, A. (1983). Texts and archaeology at Tell Ta'annek. Berytus 31: 57-66.
58. Glock, A. (1985). Tradition and change in two archaeologies. American Antiquity 50: 464-477.
59. Gold, J. R. (1992). Image and environment: The decline of cognitive behaviouralism in human geography and grounds for regeneration. Geoforum 23: 239-247.
60. Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
61. Gosden, C. (1992). Is what we write right? Antiquity 66(252): 803-808.
62. Gosden, C. (1994). Social Being and Time, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
63. Grimshaw, J. (1986). Philosophy and Feminist Thinking, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
64. Gutterman, D. S. (1994). Postmodernism and the interrogation of masculinity. In Brod, H., and Kaufmann, M. (eds.), Theorizing Masculinities, Research on Men and Masculinities 5, Sage, London, pp. 219-238.
65. Habermas, J. (1986). Autonomy and Solidarity, Verso, London.
66. Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 190-232.
67. Harding, S. (1990). Feminism, science, and the anti-enlightenment critiques. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 83-106.
68. Hartsock, N. (1987). Rethinking modernism: Minority vs. majority theories. Cultural Critique 7: 187-206.
69. Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Blackwell, Oxford.
70. Head, L. (1993). Unearthing prehistoric cultural landscapes: A view from Australia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers n.s. 18: 481-499.
71. Hill, J. D. (1993). Can we recognise a different European past? A contrastive archaeology of later prehistoric settlement in southern England. Journal of European Archaeology 1: 57-75.
72. Hodder, I. A. (ed.) (1987). Archaeology as Long-Term History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
73. Hodder, I. A. (1989a). Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In Hodder, I. (ed.), The Meanings of Things, One World Archaeology 6, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 64-78.
74. Hodder, I. A. (1989b). Writing archaeology: Site reports in context. Antiquity 63(239): 268-274.
75. Hodder, I. A. (1990).Archaeology and the post-modern. Anthropology Today 6(5): 13-15.
76. Hodder, I. A. (1991a). Postprocessual archaeology and the current debate. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.), Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Carbondale, IL, pp. 30-41.
77. Hodder, I. A. (1991b). Archaeological theory in contemporary European societies: The emergence of competing traditions. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological Theory in Europe, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1-24.
78. Hodder, I. A. (1991c). Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity 56: 7-18.
79. Hodder, I. A. (ed.) (1991d). Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades, Routledge, London.
80. Hodder, I. A. (1991e). Reading the Past, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
81. Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review 146: 53-92.
82. Johnsen, H., and B. Olsen (1992). Hermeneutics and archaeology: On the philosophy of contextual archaeology. American Antiquity 57: 419-436.
83. Kingsnorth, A. (1993). Complexities of complexity: An anthropological concern. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 292: 107-120.
84. Kirk, T. (1991). Structure, agency, and power relations "Chez les Derniers Chasseurs-Cueilleurs" of northwestern France. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.), Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 108-125.
85. Klejn, L. S. (1993). To separate a centaur: on the relationship of archaeology and history in the Soviet tradition. Antiquity 67(255): 339-348.
86. Knapp, A. B. (ed.) (1992). Archaeology, Annales and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
87. Kroker, A., and D. Cook (1986). The Postmodern Scene: Excremental Culture and the Hyper-Aesthetics, St Martin's Press, New York.
88. Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1989). Introduction. In C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.), Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-16.
89. Laudan, L. (1990). Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
90. Lee, R. B. (1992). Art, science, or politics? The crisis in hunter-gatherer studies. American Anthropologist 94: 31-54.
91. Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B., Jr. (1992). Legitimation and the classification of archaeological sites. American Antiquity 57: 137-145.
92. Longacre, W. A. (1970). Archaeology as Anthropology: A Case Study, Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 17, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
93. Lovibond, S. (1989). Feminism and postmodernism. New Left Review 178: 5-28.
94. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
95. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, (translated by Bennington, G. and Massouri, B.) University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
96. Marcus, G. E., and Fischer, M (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
97. Mascia-Lees, F., Sharpe, P. and Cohen, C. B. (1989). The postmodernist turn in anthropology. Signs 15: 7-33.
98. Moreland, J. (1990). Review article of P. Courbin, What is Archaeology? (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988). History and Theory 30: 246-261.
99. Morin, E. (1986). Ce qui à change dans la vie intellectuale française. Revue le débat 40(été): 72-82.
100. Murray, T. (1993). The childhood of William Lanne: contact archaeology and Aboriginality in Tasmania. Antiquity 67(256): 504-519.
101. Nicholson, L. J. (ed.) (1990). Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York.
102. Paddaya, K. (1990). The New Archaeology and Aftermath: A View from Outside the Anglo-American World, Ravish, Pune.
103. Patterson, T. C. (1989). History and the post-processual archaeologies. Man 24: 555-565.
104. Peebles, C. S. (1991). Annalistes, hermeneutics and positivists: squaring circles or dissolving problems. In Bintliff, J. (Ed.), The Annales School and Archaeology, Leicester University Press, Leicester, pp. 108-124.
105. Peebles, C. S. (1993). Aspects of a cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3: 250-253.
106. Plog, F. (1991). Central themes in archaeology. In Kottak, C. P. (ed.), Central Themes in the Teaching of Anthropology, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.
107. Potter, P. B., Jr. (1991). Self-reflection in archaeology. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.), Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 225-234.
108. Preucel, R. W. (ed.) (1991a). Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
109. Preucel, R. W. (1991b). Introduction, in Preucel, R. W. (ed.), Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper, 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 1-14.
110. Price, M., and Lewis, M. (1993). The reinvention of cultural geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83: 1-17.
111. Redman, C. L. (1991). Distinguished lecture in archeology: In defense of the seventies. American Anthropologist 93: 295-307.
112. Renfrew, A. C. (1980). The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: Archaeology as anthropology. American Journal of Archaeology 84: 287-298.
113. Renfrew, A. C. (1994). Towards a cognitive archaeology. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-12.
114. Renfrew, A. C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds) (1994). The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
115. Rodden, J. (1981). The development of the Three Age System: Archaeology's first paradigm. In Daniel, G. (ed.), Towards a History of Archaeology, London, Thames and Hudson, pp. 51-68.
116. Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
117. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism, Pantheon, New York.
118. Said, E. W. (1985). Orientalism revisited. In Barker, F. (ed.), Europe and its Other, University of Essex Press, Colchester.
119. Saitta, D. (1992). Radical archaeology and middle-range methodology. Antiquity 66(253): 886-897.
120. Schiffer, M. B. (1976). Behavioral Archeology, Academic Press, New York.
121. Schiffer, M. B. (1988). The structure of archaeological theory. American Antiquity 53: 461-485.
122. Schiffer, M. B. (1992). Archaeology and behavioral science: manifesto for an imperial archaeology. In Wandsnider, L. (ed.), Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 20, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 225-238.
123. Scott, J. W. (1989). History in crisis? The others' side of the story. American Historical Review 94: 680-692.
124. Seidman, S. (ed.) (1994). The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
125. Seidman, S., and Wagner, D. G. (eds.) (1992). Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate Over General Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
126. Shanks, M., and Hodder, I. A. (1994). Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In Hodder, I. A., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Last, J., and Lucas G. (eds.), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 3-29.
127. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1989). Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22: 1-54.
128. Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1992). Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., Routledge, London and New York.
129. Sherratt, A. G. (1993). The relativity of theory. In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds), Archaeological Theory-Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 119-130.
130. Smith, L. (1995). What is this thing called postprocessual archaeology ... and is it relevant for Australian archaeology? Australian Archaeology 40: 28-32.
131. Snodgrass, A. M. (1985). The new archaeology and the classical archaeologist. American Journal of Archaeology 89: 1-7.
132. Soja, R. W. (1989). Postmodern Geographies, Verso, London.
133. Spector, J. (1991). What this awl means: Toward a feminist archaeology. In Gero, J. M. and Conkey, M. W. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 388-406.
134. Stauth, G., and Turner, B. S. (1988). Nostalgia, postmodernism and the critique of mass culture. Theory, Culture and Society 5: 509-527.
135. Stevenson, M. G. (1989). Sourdoughs and cheechakos: The formation of identity-signaling social groups. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 270-312.
136. Terrell, J. (1990). Storytelling and prehistory. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory 2, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1-29.
137. Thomas, J (1990). Some, other, analogue: Writing the past. In Baker, F., and Thomas, J. (eds.), Writing the Past in the Present, Department of Archaeology, St David's University College, Lampeter, pp. 18-23.
138. Thomas, J. (1993). After essentialism: Archaeology, geography and post-modernity. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 12: 3-27.
139. Thomas, J., and Tilley, C. (1992). TAG and "post-modernism": A reply to John Bintliff. Antiquity 66(250): 106-114.
140. Tilley, C. (1989). Excavation as theatre. Antiquity 63(239): 275-280.
141. Tilley, C. (1990). On modernity and archaeological discourse. In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds.), Archaeology After Structuralism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 127-152.
142. Tilley, C. (ed.) (1993). Interpretative Archaeology, Berg, Oxford.
143. Trigger, B. G. (1989a). Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 26: 776-797.
144. Trigger, B. G. (1989b). A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
145. Trigger, B. G. (1991a). Post-processual developments in Anglo-American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 24: 65-76.
146. Tringham, R. (1991b). Households with faces: The challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 93-131.
147. Tyler, S. (1984). The poetic turn in postmodern anthropology-the poetry of Paul Friedrich. American Anthropologist 86: 328-336.
148. Vattimo, G. (1988). The End of Postmodernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-Modern Culture, Polity Press, London.
149. Walsh, K. (1990). The Post-Modern threat to the past. In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds), Archaeology After Structuralism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 278-293.
150. Walsh, K. (1992). The Representation of the Past: Museums and Heritage in the Post-Modern World, Routledge, London and New York.
151. Watson, P. J. (1991). A parochial primer: The new dissonance as seen from the Midcontinental United States. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.), Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 265-274.
152. Watson, P. J., and Fotiadis, M. (1990). The razor's edge: Symbolic-structuralist archaeology and the expansion of archaeological inference. American Anthropologist 92: 613-29.
153. Watson, R. A. (1990). Ozymandias, King of Kings: Postprocessual radical archaeology as critique. American Antiquity 55: 673-689.
154. Whitley, D. S. (1992). Prehistory and post-positivist science: A prolegomenon to cognitive archaeology. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Theory and Method 4, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 57-100.
155. Wolf, E. (1994). Perilous ideas: Race, culture, people. Current Anthropology 35: 1-12.
156. Wylie, A. (1992a). On "heavily decomposing red herrings": Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In Embree, L. (ed.), Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 269-288.
157. Wylie, A. (1992b). Feminist theories of social power: Some implications for a processual archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 25: 51-68.
158. Wylie, A. (1992c). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57: 15-35.
159. Wylie, A. (1993). Invented lands, discovered pasts: The westward expansion of myth and history. Historical Archaeology 27: 1-19.
160. Yates, T. (1990). Jacques Derrida: "There is nothing outside of the text." In Tilley, C. (ed.), Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics, and Poststructuralism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 206-280.
161. Yoffee, N. (1993). Too many chiefs? (or, safe texts for the '90s). In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), Archaeological Theory-Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 60-78.
162. Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (1993a). Introduction: The sources of archaeological theory. In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), Archaeological Theory-Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-9.
163. Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.) (1993b). Archaeological Theory-Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
164. Zubrow, E. B. W. (1994). Knowledge representation and archaeology: A cognitive example using GIS. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-118.