Change detection from temporal sequences of class labels: Application to land cover change mapping

Proceedings of the 2013 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SDM 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 650-658

  Mithal, Varun ^a   Khandelwal, Ankush ^a   Boriah, Shyam ^a   Steinhaeuser, Karsten ^a   Kumar, Vipin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; MAPPING; SIGNAL DETECTION;

APPLICATION TO LAND; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; GENERATIVE MODEL; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; LAND-COVER CHANGE; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; TEMPORAL CLASSIFICATION; TEMPORAL SEQUENCES; CHANGE DETECTION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84950132379     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611972832.72     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. M. Alberti. The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function. IRSR, 2005.
2. J. Barros. Urban Growth in Latin American Cities. PhD thesis, University College London, 2004.
3. E. Bartholomé and A. Belward. Glc2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. IJRS, 2005.
4. CIESIN. Global rural-urban mapping project (GRUMP). CIESIN, Columbia University, 2004.
5. C. Elvidge et al. Global distribution and density of constructed impervious surfaces. Sensors, 2007.
6. P. O. Gislason, J. A. Benediktsson, and J. R. Sveinsson. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(4):294-300, 2006.
7. C. Huang, L. S. Davis, and J. R. G. Townshend. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. IJRS, 23(4):725-749, 2002.
8. E. Jaser et al. Temporal post-processing of decision tree outputs for sports video categorisation. SSSPR, 2004.
9. N. Keshava and J. Mustard. Spectral unmixing. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 19(1):44-57, 2002.
10. V. Mithal, A. Khandelwal, S. Boriah, K. Steinhaeuser, and V. Kumar. Supplement for change detection from temporal sequences of class labels: Application to land cover change mapping. Technical Report UMN-CSE-13-003, Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, January 2013.
11. F. Nava, A. Nava, J. Lamolda, and M. Redondo. Change detection in remote sensing images with graph cuts. In Proceedings of SPIE, pages 59820Q-1. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 2005.
12. D. Potere et al. Mapping urban areas on a global scale: which of the eight maps now available is more accurate? IJRS, 2009.
13. L. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Readings in speech recognition, 1989.
14. A. Salberg and O. Trier. Temporal analysis of forest cover using hidden markov models. In Proceeding of IGARSS, pages 2322-2325. IEEE, 2011.
15. A. Schneider et al. A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environmental Research Letters, 2009.
16. K. C. Seto et al. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. PNAS, 2012.
17. J. Suutala et al. Discriminative temporal smoothing for activity recognition from wearable sensors. Ubiquitous Computing Systems, 2007.
18. H. Taubenböck et al. Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. RSE, 2012.
19. U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World urbanization prospects. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/.
20. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Keeping Track of Our Changing Environment: From Rio to Rio+20 (1992-2012). 2011.
21. U.S. Geological Survey. Landsat missions. http://landsat.usgs.gov/.
22. N. Viovy and G. Saint. Hidden markov models applied to vegetation dynamics analysis using satellite remote sensing. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 32(4):906-917, 1994.