Low cytotoxic trace element selenium nanoparticles and their differential antimicrobial properties against S. aureus and E. coli

Nanotechnology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Tran, Phong A ^a,b   O'Brien Simpson, Neil ^c   Reynolds, Eric C ^c   Pantarat, Namfon ^c   Biswas, Dhee P ^a   O'Connor, Andrea J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

antimicrobial; cytotoxicity; E. coli; haemolysis; nanoparticle; S. aureus; selenium

Indexed keywords

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; BLOOD; CELL CULTURE; CYTOTOXICITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; LIGHT SCATTERING; MICROORGANISMS; NANOPARTICLES; REDOX REACTIONS; SELENIUM; TRACE ELEMENTS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANTI-MICROBIAL PROPERTIES; ANTIMICROBIAL; E. COLI; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIUM; HAEMOLYSIS; S. AUREUS; UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; METAL NANOPARTICLE; SELENIUM;

3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTIONS; FIBROBLAST; HEMOLYSIS; HORSE; HUMAN; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MOUSE; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CELL SURVIVAL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTIONS; FIBROBLASTS; HEMOLYSIS; HORSES; HUMANS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; SELENIUM; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84950119551     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/4/045101     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Huh A J and Kwon Y J 2011 'Nanoantibiotics': a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era J. Control. Release 156 128-45
2. Sondi I and Salopek-Sondi B 2004 Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria J. Colloid Interface Sci. 275 177-82
3. Pal S, Tak Y K and Song J M 2007 Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73 1712-20
4. Kumar A, Pandey A K, Singh S S, Shanker R and Dhawan A 2011 Engineered ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA damage leading to reduced viability of Escherichia coli Free Radical Biol. Med 51 1872-81
5. Applerot G et al 2009 Enhanced antibacterial activity of nanocrystalline ZnO due to increased ROS-mediated cell injury Adv. Funct. Mater 19 842-52
6. Kang S, Herzberg M, Rodrigues D F and Elimelech M 2008 Antibacterial effects of carbon nanotubes: size does matter! Langmuir 24 6409-13
7. Antonelli M et al 2012 Comparison of triple-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with silver nanoparticles (AgTive) vs conventional catheters in intensive care unit patients J. Hosp. Infection 82 101-7
8. Yin H, Langford R and Burrell R 1999 Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT antimicrobial barrier dressing J. Burn Care Res. 20 195-200
9. AshaRani P, Low Kah Mun G, Hande M P and Valiyaveettil S 2008 Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells ACS Nano 3 279-90
10. Navarro-Alarcon M and Cabrera-Vique C 2008 Selenium in food and the human body: a review Sci. Total Environ. 400 115-41
11. Brown K and Arthur J 2001 Selenium, selenoproteins and human health: a review Public Health Nutrition 4 593-9
12. MacFarquhar J K et al 2010 Acute selenium toxicity associated with a dietary supplement Arch. Intern. Med 170 256-61
13. Tran P A and Webster T J 2011 Selenium nanoparticles inhibit Staphylococcus aureus growth Int. J Nanomedicine 6 1553-8
14. Tran P A and Webster T J 2013 Antimicrobial selenium nanoparticle coatings on polymeric medical devices Nanotechnology 24 155101
15. Wang Q and Webster T J 2012 Nanostructured selenium for preventing biofilm formation on polycarbonate medical devices J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100 3205-10
16. Shakibaie M, Shahverdi A R, Faramarzi M A, Hassanzadeh G R, Rahimi H R and Sabzevari O 2013 Acute and subacute toxicity of novel biogenic selenium nanoparticles in mice Pharm. Biol. 51 58-63
17. Zhang J, Wang X and Xu T 2008 Elemental selenium at nano size (Nano-Se) as a potential chemopreventive agent with reduced risk of selenium toxicity: comparison with se-methylselenocysteine in mice Toxicol. Sci. 101 22-31
18. Wang H, Zhang J and Yu H 2007 Elemental selenium at nano size possesses lower toxicity without compromising the fundamental effect on selenoenzymes: comparison with selenomethionine in mice Free Radic. Biol. Med 42 1524-33
19. Garbisu C et al 1995 Physiological mechanisms regulating the conversion of selenite to elemental selenium by Bacillus subtilis BioFactors 5 29-37
20. Tran P A, Sarin L, Hurt R H and Webster T J 2010 Titanium surfaces with adherent selenium nanoclusters as a novel anticancer orthopedic material J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 93 1417-28
21. Hong K H, Park J L, Sul I H, Youk J H and Kang T J 2006 Preparation of antimicrobial poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles J Polymer Sci. B 44 2468-74
22. Liu S, He J, Xue J and Ding W 2009 Efficient fabrication of transparent antimicrobial poly (vinyl alcohol) thin films J. Nanoparticle Res. 11 553-60
23. Morán A C, Martinez M A and Siñeriz F 2002 Quantification of surfactin in culture supernatants by hemolytic activity Biotechnol. Lett 24 177-80
24. Pejova B and Grozdanov I 2001 Solution growth and characterization of amorphous selenium thin films: heat transformation to nanocrystalline gray selenium thin films Appl. Surf. Sci. 177 152-7
25. Lin Z-H and Wang C C 2005 Evidence on the size-dependent absorption spectral evolution of selenium nanoparticles Mater. Chem. Phys. 92 591-4
26. Gaumet M, Vargas A, Gurny R and Delie F 2008 Nanoparticles for drug delivery: the need for precision in reporting particle size parameters Eur. J. Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics 69 1-9
27. Schwarz C 1999 Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery: II. Drug incorporation and physicochemical characterization J. Microencapsul 16 205-13
28. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Westerhoff P and Crittenden J 2009 Impact of natural organic matter and divalent cations on the stability of aqueous nanoparticles Water Res. 43 4249-57
29. Chung Y-C et al 2004 Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristics of cell wall Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 25 932-6
30. Dickson J S and Koohmaraie M 1989 Cell surface charge characteristics and their relationship to bacterial attachment to meat surfaces Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55 832-6
31. Gottenbos B, Grijpma D W, van der Mei H C, Feijen J and Busscher H J 2001 Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48 7-13
32. Wanger C D, Riggs W M, Davis L E, Moulder J F and Muilenberg G E 1979 Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Eden Prairie, MN: Perkin-Elmer) p 92-3
33. Wanger C D, Riggs W M, Davis L E, Moulder J F and Muilenberg G E 1981 Surf. Interface Anal. 3 92-3
34. Bhatia S K and Yetter A B 2008 Correlation of visual in vitro cytotoxicity ratings of biomaterials with quantitative in vitro cell viability measurements Cell Biol. Toxicol. 24 315-9
35. Lin Y-S and Haynes C L 2010 Impacts of mesoporous silica nanoparticle size, pore ordering, and pore integrity on hemolytic activity J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 4834-42
36. Lin J-J, Lin W-C, Dong R-X and Hsu S-H 2012 The cellular responses and antibacterial activities of silver nanoparticles stabilized by different polymers Nanotechnology 23 065102
37. Khullar P et al 2012 Bovine serum albumin bioconjugated gold nanoparticles: synthesis, hemolysis, and cytotoxicity toward cancer cell lines J. Phys. Chem. C 116 8834-43
38. Suresh A K et al 2010 Silver nanocrystallites: biofabrication using Shewanella oneidensis, and an evaluation of their comparative toxicity on gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 5210-5
39. Premanathan M, Karthikeyan K, Jeyasubramanian K and Manivannan G 2011 Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation Nanomedicine 7 184-92
40. Gross M, Cramton S E, Götz F and Peschel A 2001 Key role of teichoic acid net charge in Staphylococcus aureus colonization of artificial surfaces Infection Immunity 69 3423-6
41. Wilson W W, Wade M M, Holman S C and Champlin F R 2001 Status of methods for assessing bacterial cell surface charge properties based on zeta potential measurements J. Microbiol. Methods 43 153-64
42. Matsuo M, Oogai Y, Kato F, Sugai M and Komatsuzawa H 2011 Growth-phase dependence of susceptibility to antimicrobial peptides in staphylococcus aureus Microbiology 157 1786-97