Responsiveness to change of self-report and device-based physical activity measures in the living well with diabetes trial

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1082-1087

  Lee, Winnie Y H ^a   Clark, Bronwyn K ^a   Winkler, Elisabeth ^a   Eakin, Elizabeth G ^a   Reeves, Marina M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accelerometers; Exercise; Measurement; Questionnaires; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT; WALKING; WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COUNSELING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF REPORT; WALKING; WEIGHT REDUCTION PROGRAMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84950117031     PISSN: 15433080     EISSN: 15435474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0265     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Haskell WL, Lee I-M, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health. Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116(9):1081-1093. doi:10.1161/CIRCULA-TIONAHA.107.185649 PubMed
2. World Health Organisation. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010.
3. Hagströmer M, Ainsworth BE, Kwak L, Bowles HR. A checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of validation studies on self-report instruments for physical activity and sedentary behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(Suppl 1):S29-S36. PubMed
4. Pettee Gabriel KK, Morrow JRJ, Woolsey AL. Framework for physical activity as a complex and multidimensional behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(Suppl 1):S11-S18.
5. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Med. 2001;31(2):91-100. PubMed doi:10.2165/00007256-200131020-00002
6. Washburn RA, Heath GW, Jackson AW. Reliability, validity, and methodological issues concerning large-scale surveillance of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2):104. PubMed doi:10.1080/0 2701367.2000.11082793
7. Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):272-281 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60816-2. PubMed
8. Marshall AL, Owen N, Bauman AE. Mediated approaches for infuenc-ing physical activity: update of the evidence on mass media, print, telephone and website delivery of interventions. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1, Suppl):74-80. PubMed doi:10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80281-0
9. van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40(7):565-600 doi:10.2165/11531930-000000000-00000. PubMed
10. Reeves MM, Marshall AL, Owen N, Winkler E, Eakin EG. Measuring physical activity change in broad-reach intervention trials. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(2):194-202.
11. Hoos T, Espinoza N, Marshall SJ, Arredondo EM. Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in adult Latinas. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(5):698-705. PubMed
12. Eakin E, Reeves M, Winkler E, et al. Six-month outcomes from Living Well with Diabetes: a randomized trial of a telephone delivered weight loss and physical activity intervention to improve glycemic control. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(2):193-203. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9498-2 PubMed
13. Eakin EG, Reeves MM, Marshall AL, et al. Living Well with Diabetes: a randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered intervention for maintenance of weight loss, physical activity and glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):452. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-452 PubMed
14. Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005;330:843. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843 PubMed
15. Brown WJ, Trost SG, Bauman A, Mummery K, Owen N. Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(2):205-215. doi:10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80010-0 PubMed
16. Fjeldsoe B, Winkler E, Marshall A, Eakin E, Reeves M. Active adults recall their physical activity differently to less active adults: test-retest reliability and validity of a physical activity survey. Health Promot J Austr. 2013;24(1):26-31. PubMed
17. Timperio A, Salmon J, Rosenberg M, Bull FC. Do logbooks influence recall of physical activity in validation studies? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(7):1181-1186. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000132268.74992.D8 PubMed
18. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for implementation, analysis and reporting. Canberra: AIHW; 2003.
19. Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, Sallis JF, Rauh MJ, Barrington E. Correlates of change in walking for exercise: an exploratory analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63(4):425-434. PubMed doi:10.1080/0270136 7.1992.10608765
20. Johnson MF, Sallis JF, Hovell MF. Self-report assessment of walking: effects of aided recall instructions and item order. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2000;4(3):141-155. doi:10.1207/S15327841Mpee0403-1
21. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-781.
22. Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coeffcient. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:23. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-23 PubMed
23. Tuley MR, Mulrow CD, McMahan CA. Estimating and testing an index of responsiveness and the relationship of the index to power. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(4-5):417-421 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90080-S. PubMed
24. Hess MR, Kromrey JD. EFFECT-CI: A SAS macro for constructing confdence intervals around standardized mean differences. Proceedings of the Southeast SAS Users Group; 2003.
25. Williams ED, Tapp RJ, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Oldenburg BF. Health behaviours, socioeconomic status and diabetes incidence: the Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Dia-betologia. 2010;53(12):2538-2545. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1888-4 PubMed
26. Sloane R, Snyder DC, Demark-Wahnefried W, Lobach D, Kraus WE. Comparing the 7-day physical activity recall with a triaxial accelerometer for measuring time in exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(6):1334-1340. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181984fa8 PubMed
27. Graff-Iversen S, Anderssen S, Holme I, Jenum A, Raastad T. An adapted version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L): construct validity in a low-income, multiethnic population study from Oslo, Norway. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4(1):13. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-13 PubMed
28. Winkler E, Waters L, Eakin E, Fjeldsoe B, Owen N, Reeves M. Is measurement error altered by participation in a physical activity intervention? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(5):1004-1011. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827ccf7d PubMed
29. Wetten AA, Batterham M, Tan SY, Tapsell L. Relative validity of three accelerometer models for estimating energy expenditure during light activity. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(3):638-47. http://dx.doi. org/10.1123/jpah.2011-0167
30. Lyden K, Kozey SL, Staudenmeyer JW, Freedson PS. A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(2):187-201. doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1639-8 PubMed