Predicting learning plateau of working memory from whole-brain intrinsic network connectivity patterns

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Yamashita, Masahiro ^a,b   Kawato, Mitsuo ^a,b,c   Imamizu, Hiroshi ^a,c  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^b NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MODEL; PREDICTION; REST; WORKING MEMORY; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RADIOGRAPHY; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84949845315     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep07622     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Olesen, P. J., Westerberg, H. & Klingberg, T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat Neurosci 7, 75-79, DOI:10.1038/nn1165 (2004).
2. Takeuchi, H. et al. Training of working memory impacts structural connectivity. J Neurosci 30, 3297-3303, DOI:10.1523/jneurosci.4611-09.2010 (2010).
3. Jolles, D. D., van Buchem,M. A., Crone, E. A. & Rombouts, S. A. Functional brain connectivity at rest changes after working memory training. Hum Brain Mapp 34, 396-406, DOI:10.1002/hbm.21444 (2013).
4. Kundu, B., Sutterer, D. W., Emrich, S. M. & Postle, B. R. Strengthened effective connectivity underlies transfer of working memory training to tests of short-term memory and attention. J Neurosci 33, 8705-8715, DOI:10.1523/jneurosci.5565-12.2013 (2013).
5. Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R. & Bullmore, E. N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 25, 46-59, DOI:10.1002/hbm.20131 (2005).
6. Laird, A. R. et al. Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks. J Cogn Neurosci 23, 4022-4037, DOI:10.1162/jocn-a-00077 (2011).
7. Rottschy, C. et al. Modelling neural correlates of working memory: a coordinatebased meta-analysis. Neuroimage 60, 830-846, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.050 (2012).
8. Pessoa, L., Gutierrez, E., Bandettini, P. & Ungerleider, L. Neural correlates of visual working memory: fMRI amplitude predicts task performance. Neuron 35, 975-987 (2002).
9. Palva, J. M., Monto, S., Kulashekhar, S. & Palva, S. Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 7580-7585, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0913113107 (2010).
10. Gordon, E. M., Stollstorff, M. & Vaidya, C. J. Using spatial multiple regression to identify intrinsic connectivity networks involved in working memory performance. Hum Brain Mapp 33, 1536-1552, DOI:10.1002/hbm.21306 (2012).
11. Baldassarre, A. et al. Individual variability in functional connectivity predicts performance of a perceptual task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 3516-3521, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113148109 (2012).
12. Ventura-Campos, N. et al. Spontaneous brain activity predicts learning ability of foreign sounds. J Neurosci 33, 9295-9305, DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4655-12.2013 (2013).
13. Supekar, K. et al. Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 8230-8235, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1222154110 (2013).
14. Smith, S. M. et al. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 13040-13045, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0905267106 (2009).
15. Allen, E. A. et al. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb Cortex 24, 663-676, DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhs352 (2014).
16. Eguiluz, V. M., Chialvo, D. R., Cecchi, G. A., Baliki, M. & Apkarian, A. V. Scalefree brain functional networks. Physical review letters 94, 018102 (2005).
17. Gallos, L. K., Makse, H. A. & Sigman, M. A small world of weak ties provides optimal global integration of self-similar modules in functional brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 2825-2830, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1106612109 (2012).
18. Reis, S. D. S. et al. Avoiding catastrophic failure in correlated networks of networks. Nature Physics 10, 762-767, DOI:10.1038/nphys3081 (2014).
19. Bassett, D. S. et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 7641-7646, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1018985108 (2011).
20. Hampson, M., Driesen, N. R., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C. & Constable, R. T. Brain connectivity related to working memory performance. J Neurosci 26, 13338-13343, DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-06.2006 (2006).
21. Hampson, M., Driesen, N., Roth, J. K., Gore, J. C. & Constable, R. T. Functional connectivity between task-positive and task-negative brain areas and its relation to working memory performance. Magn Reson Imaging 28, 1051-1057, DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2010.03.021 (2010).
22. Sala-Llonch, R. et al. Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance. Cortex 48, 1187-1196, DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.006 (2012).
23. Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. & Shah, P. Short-and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 10081-10086, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1103228108 (2011).
24. Feldman, L. S., Cao, J., Andalib, A., Fraser, S. & Fried, G. M. A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining ''learning plateau'' and ''learning rate'' Surgery 146, 381-386, DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2009.02.021 (2009).
25. Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L.& Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142-2154, DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 (2012).
26. Sato, M.-A. Online model selection based on the variational Bayes. Neural Computation 13, 1649-1681 (2001).
27. Dosenbach,N.U. et al. Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 329, 1358-1361, DOI:10.1126/science.1194144 (2010).
28. Shirer, W. R., Ryali, S., Rykhlevskaia, E., Menon, V. & Greicius, M. D. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex 22, 158-165, DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhr099 (2012).
29. Yamashita, O., Sato, M. A., Yoshioka, T., Tong, F. & Kamitani, Y. Sparse estimation automatically selects voxels relevant for the decoding of fMRI activity patterns. Neuroimage 42, 1414-1429, DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.050 (2008).
30. Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn Sci 15, 254-262, DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003 (2011).
31. Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3, 201-215, DOI:10.1038/nrn755 (2002).
32. Fiebach, C. J., Rissman, J. & D'Esposito, M. Modulation of inferotemporal cortex activation during verbal working memory maintenance. Neuron 51, 251-261, DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.007 (2006).
33. Nee, D. E. & Jonides, J. Trisecting representational states in short-term memory. Front Hum Neurosci 7, 796, DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00796 (2013).
34. Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Chen, E. E. & Small, S. L. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex 14, 1246-1255, DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhh086 (2004).
35. Kasess, C. H. et al. The suppressive influence of SMA on M1 in motor imagery revealed by fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 40, 828-837, DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.040 (2008).
36. James, K. H. & Gauthier, I. Letter processing automatically recruits a sensorymotor brain network. Neuropsychologia 44, 2937-2949, DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.026 (2006).
37. Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M. & Velay, J. L. Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimage 19, 1492-1500 (2003).
38. Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. et al. Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 1279-1284, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0809141106 (2009).
39. Cole, M. W., Yarkoni, T., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A. & Braver, T. S. Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. J Neurosci 32, 8988-8999, DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0536-12.2012 (2012).
40. Anticevic, A. et al. NMDA receptor function in large-scale anticorrelated neural systems with implications for cognition and schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 16720-16725, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1208494109 (2012).
41. Gee, D. G. et al. A developmental shift from positive to negative connectivity in human amygdala-prefrontal circuitry. J Neurosci 33, 4584-4593, DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-12.2013 (2013).
42. Takeuchi, H. et al. Effects of workingmemory training on functional connectivity and cerebral blood flow during rest. Cortex 49, 2106-2125, DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.007 (2013).
43. Fox, M. D. et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 9673-9678, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 (2005).
44. Ray, K. L. et al. ICAmodel order selection of task co-activation networks. Frontiers in neuroscience 7, 237, DOI:10.3389/fnins.2013.00237 (2013).