Big Data and the Future of Radiology Informatics

Academic Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 30-42

  Kansagra, Akash P ^a   Yu, John Paul J ^b,k   Chatterjee, Arindam R ^a   Lenchik, Leon ^c   Chow, Daniel S ^d   Prater, Adam B ^e   Yeh, Jean ^b   Doshi, Ankur M ^f   Hawkins, C Matthew ^e   Heilbrun, Marta E ^g   Smith, Stacy E ^h   Oselkin, Martin ⁱ   Gupta, Pushpender ^c   Ali, Sayed ^j  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Department of Medicine   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Informatics; Personalized medicine; Radiology; Value; Workflow

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; WORKFLOW; COST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECONOMICS; FORECASTING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEM; TRENDS;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PRECISION MEDICINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84949669471     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Murdoch T.B., Detsky A.S. The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 2013, 309:1351-1352.
2. Badawi O., Brennan T., Celi L.A., et al. Making big data useful for health care: a summary of the inaugural MIT critical data conference. JMIR Med Inform 2014, 2:e22.
3. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. Big Data: The Management Revolution 2012, Harvard Business Review.
4. Schroeck M., Schockley R. Analytics: The real-world use of big data Available at:, Accessed June 3, 2015. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/ibv-big-data-at-work.html.
5. Groves P., Kayyali B., Knott D., et al. McKinsey report "The Big Data Revolution in Healthcare." Available at:, Accessed June 3, 2015. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/health_systems_and_services/the_big-data_revolution_in_us_health_care.
6. Olsen L., Aisner D., McGinnis J.M., et al. Summary. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary 2007, 1-36. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
7. Blount M., Ebling M.R., Eklund J.M., et al. Real-time analysis for intensive care: development and deployment of the Artemis analytic system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2010, 29:110-118.
8. Avrin D.E., Urbania T.H. Demise of film. Acad Radiol 2014, 21:303-304.
9. Levine D., Brown D.L., Andreotti R.F., et al. Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology 2010, 256:943-954.
10. Mainiero M.B., Lourenco A., Mahoney M.C., et al. ACR appropriateness criteria breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2013, 10:11-14.
11. Walker C., Haylock B., Husband D., et al. Clinical use of genotype to predict chemosensitivity in oligodendroglial tumors. Neurology 2006, 66:1661-1667.
12. Paez J.G., Janne P.A., Lee J.C., et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004, 304:1497-1500.
13. Dawood S., Broglio K., Buzdar A.U., et al. Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:92-98.
14. Dilsizian S.E., Siegel E.L. Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep 2014, 16:441.
15. Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M., et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2012 Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; Available at:, Accessed June 3, 2015. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2012/.
16. MacMahon H., Austin J.H., Gamsu G., et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005, 237:395-400.
17. Morrison J.J., Hostetter J., Wang K., et al. Data-driven decision support for radiologists: re-using the National Lung Screening Trial dataset for pulmonary nodule management. J Digit Imaging 2015, 28:18-23.
18. McClelland R.L., Nasir K., Budoff M., et al. Arterial age as a function of coronary artery calcium (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA]). Am J Cardiol 2009, 103:59-63.
19. Malin J.L. Envisioning Watson as a rapid-learning system for oncology. J Oncol Pract 2013, 9:155-157.
20. Pyra T., Hui B., Hanstock C., et al. Combined structural and neurochemical evaluation of the corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2010, 11:157-165.
21. Landry G.J., Liu-Ambrose T. Buying time: a rationale for examining the use of circadian rhythm and sleep interventions to delay progression of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2014, 6:325.
22. Hebert L.E., Weuve J., Scherr P.A., et al. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 2013, 80:1778-1783.
23. Langa K.M., Levine D.A. The diagnosis and management of mild cognitive impairment: a clinical review. JAMA 2014, 312:2551-2561.
24. McEvoy L.K., Holland D., Hagler D.J., et al. Mild cognitive impairment: baseline and longitudinal structural MR imaging measures improve predictive prognosis. Radiology 2011, 259:834-843.
25. Kumar V., Gu Y., Basu S., et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 30:1234-1248.
26. Lambin P., Rios-Velazquez E., Leijenaar R., et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 2012, 48:441-446.
27. Aerts H.J., Velazquez E.R., Leijenaar R.T., et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014, 5:4006.
28. Mazurowski M.A. Radiogenomics: what it is and why it is important. J Am Coll Radiol 2015, 12:862-866.
29. Rosenstein B.S., West C.M., Bentzen S.M., et al. Radiogenomics: radiobiology enters the era of big data and team science. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014, 89:709-713.
30. Porter M.E. A strategy for health care reform-toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:109-112.
31. Porter M.E. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:2477-2481.
32. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Linnet K., et al. Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Clin Chem 2012, 58:1636-1643.
33. Ferrante di Ruffano L., Hyde C.J., McCaffery K.J., et al. Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials. BMJ 2012, 344:e686.
34. Heit J., Cohen A., Anderson F.J. Estimated annual number of incident and recurrent, non-fatal and fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in the US. Blood 2005, 106:267A.
35. LaMori J.C., Shoheiber O., Mody S.H., et al. Inpatient resource use and cost burden of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the United States. Clin Ther 2015, 37:62-70.
36. Remy-Jardin M., Remy J., Wattinne L., et al. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique-comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1992, 185:381-387.
37. Anderson D.R., Kovacs M.J., Dennie C., et al. Use of spiral computed tomography contrast angiography and ultrasonography to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2005, 29:399-404.
38. Bettmann M.A., Baginski S.G., White R.D., et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) acute chest pain-suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging 2012, 27:W28-W31.
39. Costantino M.M., Randall G., Gosselin M., et al. CT angiography in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191:471-474.
40. Wiener R.S., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 2011, 171:831-837.
41. Khorasani R. You should eliminate paper from your PACS workflow: why and how?. J Am Coll Radiol 2006, 3:628-629.
42. Prevedello L., Khorasani R. Which radiology application drives your workflow? Which should?. J Am Coll Radiol 2013, 10:80-82.
43. Nagy P.G., Warnock M.J., Daly M., et al. Informatics in radiology: automated Web-based graphical dashboard for radiology operational business intelligence. Radiographics 2009, 29:1897-1906.
44. Lu L., Li J., Gisler P. Improving financial performance by modeling and analysis of radiology procedure scheduling at a large community hospital. J Med Syst 2011, 35:299-307.
45. Lakhani P., Kim W., Langlotz C.P. Automated detection of critical results in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 2012, 25:30-36.
46. Bhargavan M., Sunshine J.H. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology 2005, 234:824-832.
47. Parker L., Levin D.C., Frangos A., et al. Geographic variation in the utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging: national medicare data, 1998-2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194:1034-1039.
48. Patti J.A. The national radiology data registry: a necessary component of quality health care. J Am Coll Radiol 2011, 8:453.
49. Rosen M.P., Ding A., Blake M.A., et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 2011, 8:749-755.
50. Trout A.T., Sanchez R., Ladino-Torres M.F., et al. A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?. Pediatr Radiol 2012, 42:813-823.
51. Abujudeh H., Pyatt R.S., Bruno M.A., et al. RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. J Am Coll Radiol 2014, 11:899-904.
52. Strowig G. Making the switch to vendor-neutral archiving. How to optimize comprehensive data storage for healthcare's new age. Health Manag Technol 2013, 34:10. 2-3.
53. Puppala M., He T., Chen S., et al. METEOR: an enterprise health informatics environment to support evidence-based medicine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2450181.
54. Starren J.B., Winter A.Q., Lloyd-Jones D.M. Enabling a learning health system through a unified enterprise data warehouse: the experience of the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute. Clin Transl Sci 2015, 8:269-271.
55. Evans R.S., Lloyd J.F., Pierce L.A. Clinical use of an enterprise data warehouse. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012, 2012:189-198.
56. Horvath M.M., Winfield S., Evans S., et al. The DEDUCE Guided Query tool: providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement. J Biomed Inform 2011, 44:266-276.
57. Chute C.G., Beck S.A., Fisk T.B., et al. The enterprise data trust at Mayo Clinic: a semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:131-135.
58. Lacson R., Khorasani R. Practical examples of natural language processing in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2011, 8:872-874.
59. Channin D.S., Mongkolwat P., Kleper V., et al. The annotation and image mark-up project. Radiology 2009, 253:590-592.
60. Reiner B.I. Creating accountability in image quality analysis part 3: creation of a standardized image-centric mark-up and annotation tool. J Digit Imaging 2013, 26:600-604.
61. Gorgolewski K., Burns C.D., Madison C., et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front Neuroinform 2011, 5:13.
62. Zijdenbos A.P., Forghani R., Evans A.C. Automatic "pipeline" analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21:1280-1291.
63. Jee K., Kim G.H. Potentiality of big data in the medical sector: focus on how to reshape the healthcare system. Healthc Inform Res 2013, 19:79-85.
64. Mennes M., Biswal B.B., Castellanos F.X., et al. Making data sharing work: the FCP/INDI experience. Neuroimage 2013, 82:683-691.
65. Robson B. The dragon on the gold: myths and realities for data mining in biomedicine and biotechnology using digital and molecular libraries. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:1113-1119.
66. Sox H.C., Goodman S.N. The methods of comparative effectiveness research. Annu Rev Public Health 2012, 33:425-445.
67. Grossmann C., Powers B., Sanders J., et al. Issues and opportunities in the emergence of large health-related datasets. Digital data improvement priorities for continuous learning in health and health care: workshop summary 2013, 27-32. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
68. Olsen L., Grossmann C., McGinnis J.M., et al. Moving forward. Learning what works: infrastructure required for comparative effectiveness research: workshop summary 2011, 315-332. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
69. Lord S.J., Gebski V.J., Keech A.C. Multiple analyses in clinical trials: sound science or data dredging?. Med J Aust 2004, 181:452-454.