Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 459-466.e2

  Doyle, Joseph O ^a   Richter, Kevin S ^a   Lim, Joshua ^a   Stillman, Robert J ^a   Graham, James R ^a   Tucker, Michael J ^a  

^a Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Autologous oocyte vitrification; fertility preservation; live birth; warming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; NIDATION; OOCYTE MATURATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VITRIFICATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGE; OOCYTE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OOCYTES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITRIFICATION;

EID: 84949669448     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1 Noyes, N., Porcu, E., Borini, A., Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online 18 (2009), 769–776.
2. 2 Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Society for Assisted Reproductive Techologies. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 37–43.
3. 3 Cobo, A., Meseguer, M., Remohi, J., Pellicer, A., Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod 25 (2010), 2239–2246.
4. 4 Sole, M., Santalo, J., Boada, M., Clua, E., Rodriguez, I., Martinez, F., et al. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod 28 (2013), 2087–2092.
5. 5 Trokoudes, K.M., Pavlides, C., Zhang, X., Comparison outcome of fresh and vitrified donor oocytes in an egg-sharing donation program. Fertil Steril 95 (2011), 1996–2000.
6. 6 Chang, C.C., Elliott, T.A., Wright, G., Shapiro, D.B., Toledo, A.A., Nagy, Z.P., Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 1891–1897.
7. 7 Rienzi, L., Romano, S., Albricci, L., Maggiulli, R., Capalbo, A., Baroni, E., et al. Embryo development of fresh ‘versus’ vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod 25 (2010), 66–73.
8. 8 Forman, E.J., Li, X., Ferry, K.M., Scott, K., Treff, N.R., Scott, R.T. Jr., Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril 98 (2012), 644–649.
9. 9 Antinori, M., Licata, E., Dani, G., Cerusico, F., Versaci, C., Antinori, S., Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod Biomed Online 14 (2007), 72–79.
10. 10 Stillman, R.J., Richter, K.S., Banks, N.K., Graham, J.R., Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice. Fertil Steril 92 (2009), 1895–1906.
11. 11 Kuwayama, M., Vajta, G., Kato, O., Leibo, S.P., Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 11 (2005), 300–308.
12. 12 Gardner, D.K., Schoolcraft, W.B., In vitro culture of human blastocysts. Jansen, R., Mortimer, D., (eds.) Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999, 1999, Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth, UK, 378–388.
13. 13 Liebermann, J., Tucker, M.J., Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril 86 (2006), 20–26.
14. 14 Cao, Y., Xing, Q., Zhang, Z.G., Wei, Z.L., Zhou, P., Cong, L., Cryopreservation of immature and in-vitro matured human oocytes by vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 19 (2009), 369–373.
15. 15 Fasano, G., Demeestere, I., Englert, Y., In-vitro maturation of human oocytes: before or after vitrification?. J Assist Reprod Genet 29 (2012), 507–512.
16. 16 Jee, B.C., Chen, H.Y., Chian, R.C., Suh, C.S., Kim, S.H., Moon, S.Y., Vitrification of immature mouse oocyte using stepwise equilibration before or after in vitro maturation. Fertil Steril 92 (2009), 1153–1157.
17. 17 Roque, M., Lattes, K., Serra, S., Sola, I., Geber, S., Carreras, R., et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 156–162.
18. 18 Shapiro, B.S., Daneshmand, S.T., Garner, F.C., Aguirre, M., Hudson, C., Thomas, S., Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 96 (2011), 344–348.
19. 19 Shapiro, B.S., Daneshmand, S.T., Restrepo, H., Garner, F.C., Aguirre, M., Hudson, C., Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 389–392.
20. 20 Evans, J., Hannan, N.J., Hincks, C., Rombauts, L.J., Salamonsen, L.A., Defective soil for a fertile seed? Altered endometrial development is detrimental to pregnancy success. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e53098.
21. 21 Fauser, B.C., Devroey, P., Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14 (2003), 236–242.
22. 22 Cobo, A., Castello, D., Vallejo, B., Albert, C., de los Santos, J.M., Remohi, J., Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 1623–1630.
23. 23 Devine, K., Mumford, S.L., Goldman, K.N., Hodes-Wertz, B., Druckenmiller, S., Propst, A.M., et al. Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth. Fertil Steril 103 (2015), 1446–1453.e2.
24. 24 Mesen, T.B., Mersereau, J.E., Kane, J.B., Steiner, A.Z., Optimal timing for elective egg freezing. Fertil Steril 103 (2015), 1551–1556.e4.
25. 25 Garcia-Velasco, J.A., Domingo, J., Cobo, A., Martinez, M., Carmona, L., Pellicer, A., Five years' experience using oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 1994–1999.
26. 26 Martinez, M., Rabadan, S., Domingo, J., Cobo, A., Pellicer, A., Garcia-Velasco, J.A., Obstetric outcome after oocyte vitrification and warming for fertility preservation in women with cancer. Reprod Biomed Online 29 (2014), 722–728.
27. 27 Levi Setti, P.E., Porcu, E., Patrizio, P., Vigiliano, V., de Luca, R., d'Aloja, P., et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation with slow freezing versus vitrification. Results from the National Italian Registry data, 2007-2011. Fertil Steril 102 (2014), 90–95.e2.