메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 148, Issue , 2016, Pages 142-151

Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users

Author keywords

Health sciences; Qualitative research assessment; Qualitative research guidelines; Quality criteria; Switzerland

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; GUIDELINE; HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84949657955     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.007     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (96)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 0003170822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers
    • Blaxter M. Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Med. Sociol. News 1996, 22(1):68-71.
    • (1996) Med. Sociol. News , vol.22 , Issue.1 , pp. 68-71
    • Blaxter, M.1
  • 2
    • 33846646152 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods
    • Dixon-Woods M., Sutton A., Shaw R., Miller T., Smith J., Young B., Jones D. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2007, 12(1):42-47. 10.1258/135581907779497486.
    • (2007) J. Health Serv. Res. Policy , vol.12 , Issue.1 , pp. 42-47
    • Dixon-Woods, M.1    Sutton, A.2    Shaw, R.3    Miller, T.4    Smith, J.5    Young, B.6    Jones, D.7
  • 4
    • 0034686721 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Users' guides to the medical literature, XXIII: qualitative research in health care. Are the results of the study valid?
    • Giacomini M.K., Cook D.J. Users' guides to the medical literature, XXIII: qualitative research in health care. Are the results of the study valid?. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2000, 284(3):357-362. 10.1001/jama.284.3.357.
    • (2000) J. Am. Med. Assoc. , vol.284 , Issue.3 , pp. 357-362
    • Giacomini, M.K.1    Cook, D.J.2
  • 7
    • 0034097460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research
    • Mays N., Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br. Med. J. 2000, 320:50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.
    • (2000) Br. Med. J. , vol.320 , pp. 50-52
    • Mays, N.1    Pope, C.2
  • 8
    • 34247544365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating qualitative research studies
    • Pickler R.H. Evaluating qualitative research studies. J. Pediatr. Health Care 2007, 21:195-197.
    • (2007) J. Pediatr. Health Care , vol.21 , pp. 195-197
    • Pickler, R.H.1
  • 9
    • 84889956689 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality in qualitative health research
    • Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, C. Pope, N. Mays (Eds.)
    • Pope N., Mays C. Quality in qualitative health research. Qualitative Research in Health Care 2006, 82-101. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. C. Pope, N. Mays (Eds.).
    • (2006) Qualitative Research in Health Care , pp. 82-101
    • Pope, N.1    Mays, C.2
  • 10
    • 4644222393 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Renouveau des méthodologies qualitatives dans les pays anglo-saxons
    • Santiago-Delefosse M. Renouveau des méthodologies qualitatives dans les pays anglo-saxons. Psychol. Clin. 2001, 11(3):47-58.
    • (2001) Psychol. Clin. , vol.11 , Issue.3 , pp. 47-58
    • Santiago-Delefosse, M.1
  • 11
    • 84949657955 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users
    • Santiago-Delefosse M., Gavin A., Bruchez C., Roux P., Stephen S.L. Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Social Sci. Med. 2015, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.007.
    • (2015) Social Sci. Med.
    • Santiago-Delefosse, M.1    Gavin, A.2    Bruchez, C.3    Roux, P.4    Stephen, S.L.5


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.