Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists

Academic Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 70-77

  Damases, Christine N ^a,b   Brennan, Patrick C ^a   Mello Thoms, Claudia ^a   McEntee, Mark F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA   (Namibia)

Author keywords

Automated density assessment; BIRADS categories; Breast density; Mammographic; Volpara

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BREAST DENSITY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REPRODUCIBILITY; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS; TUMOR VOLUME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATION; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOLOGISTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84949656794     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15:1159-1169.
2. Ursin G.Q.S. Mammographic density-a useful biomarker for the breast cancer risk in epidemiologic studies. Norsk Epidermiologi 2009, 19:59-68.
3. Yaffe M.J. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10:209.
4. Harvey J.A., Bovbjerg V.E. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004, 230:29-41.
5. Ng K.H., Yip C.H., Taib N.A.M. Standardisation of clinical breast-density measurement. Lancet Oncol 2012, 13:334-336.
6. Shepherd J.A., Kerlikowske K., Ma L., et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011, 20:1473-1482.
7. D'Orsi C.J., Bassett L.W., Berg W.A., et al. BI-RADS mammography. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-breast imaging atlas 2003, 61-128. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. 4th ed. C.J. D'Orsi, E.B. Mendelson, D.M. Ikeda (Eds.).
8. Radiology ACo The American College of radiology BIRADS ATLAS and MQSA: frequently asked questions Available at:, Accessed September 25. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/BIRADS/BIRADSFAQs.pdf.
9. Radiology ACo BI-RADS mammography 2013-ACR BI-RADS atlas 2014, Available at:, Accessed March 17. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/BIRADS, 5th ed.
10. Andersson I., Ikeda D.M., Zackrisson S., et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2817-2825.
11. Duffy S.W., Nagtegaal I.D., Astley S.M., et al. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10:R64.
12. Nicholson B.T., LoRusso A.P., Smolkin M., et al. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 2006, 13:1143-1149.
13. Zhou C., Chan H.P., Petrick N., et al. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med Phys 2001, 28:1056-1069.
14. McCormack V.A., Highnam R., Perry N., et al. Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007, 16:1148-1154.
15. Ciatto S., Bernardi D., Calabrese M., et al. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification. Breast 2012, 21:503-506.
16. Ooms E.A., Zonderland H.M., Eijkemans M.J.C., et al. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 2007, 16:568-576.
17. Highnam R., Brady M., Yaffe M.J., et al. Robust breast composition measurement: Volpara. Digital mammography 2010, 342-349. J. Marti, A. Oliver, J. Freixenet (Eds.).
18. Tagliafico A., Tagliafico G., Tosto S., et al. Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one. Breast 2009, 18:35-40.
19. Byng J.W., Boyd N.F., Fishell E., et al. Automated analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1996, 41:909-923.
20. Alonzo-Proulx O., Mawdsley G.E., Patrie J.T., et al. Reliability of automated breast density measurement. Radiology 2015, 275:366-376.
21. Sauber N., Chan A., Highnam R. BI-RADS breast density classification-an international standard 2013, ECR.
22. Wang K., Chan A., Highnam R. Robustness of automated volumetric breast density estimation for assessing temporal changes in breast density 2015, ECR.
23. Gweon H.M., Youk J.H., Kim J.A., et al. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2013, 201:692-697.
24. Damases C.N., Brennan P.C., McEntee M.F. Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system. J Med Imag 2015, 2:15501-15505.
25. McEntee M.F., Damases C.N. Mammographic density measurement: a comparison of automated volumetric density measurement to BIRADS. Med Imag 2014: Image Percept, Obs Perform, Technol Assess 2014, 9037:8.
26. Wanders J.O., Holland K., Veldhuis W.B., et al. Effect of volumetric mammographic density on performance of a breast cancer screening program using full-field digital mammography 2015, ECR.
27. Börjesson S., Håkansson M., Båth M., et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005, 114:45-52.
28. Brennan P.C., McEntee M., Evanoff M., et al. Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:W177-W180.
29. Volpara Solutions Volpara clinical breast density and its implications for your patients Available at:, Accessed March 27. http://www.volparadensity.com/clinicians/.
30. Berg W.A., Campassi C., Langenberg P., et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2000, 174:1769-1777.
31. Viera A.J., Garrett J.M. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005, 37:360-363.
32. Martin K.E., Helvie M.A., Zhou C., et al. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 2006, 240:656-665.
33. Ciatto S., Houssami N., Apruzzese A., et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 2005, 14:269-275.
34. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J., et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90:1801-1809.
35. Jeffreys M., Harvey J., Highnam R. Comparing a new volumetric breast density method (Volpara™) to Cumulus. Digital mammography 2010, 408-413. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin. J. Marti, A. Oliver, J. Freixenet (Eds.).
36. Byng J.W., Boyd N.F., Fishell E., et al. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994, 39:1629-1638.
37. Byng J.W., Yaffe M.J., Jong R.A., et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 1998, 18:1587-1598.
38. Boyd N.F., Byng J.W., Jong R.A., et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 87:670-675.
39. Morris O.W.E., Tucker L., Black R., et al. Mammographic breast density: comparison of methods for qualitative evaluation. Radiology 2015, 275:356-365.
40. Holland K., Kallenberg M., Mann R., et al. Stability of volumetric tissue composition measured in serial screening mammograms. Breast imaging 2014, 239-244. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. H. Fujita, T. Hara, C. Muramatsu (Eds.).
41. Schilling K., The J., Griff S., et al. Impact of quantitative breast density on experienced radiologists' assessment of mammographic breast density 2015, European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, Austria, C-1281.
42. Elmore J.G., Wells C.K., Lee C.H., et al. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. NEJM 1994, 331:1493-1499.