Wrapping it up in a person: Examining employment and earnings outcomes for Ph.D. recipients

Science

Volumn 350, Issue 6266, 2015, Pages 1367-1371

  Zolas, Nikolas ^a   Goldschlag, Nathan ^a   Jarmin, Ron ^a   Stephan, Paula ^b,c   Owen Smith, Jason ^d   Rosen, Rebecca F ^e   Allen, Barbara McFadden ^f   Weinberg, Bruce A ^c,g,h   Lane, Julia I ^a,e,h,i,j  

^a U S CENSUS BUREAU   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Technology Collaboration   (United States)

^g OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h IZA   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^j AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; RESEARCH WORK; SERVICE SECTOR; UNIVERSITY SECTOR; WAGE DETERMINATION;

ARTICLE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMPLOYMENT; GRADUATE STUDENT; HUMAN; PHD STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALARY; SCIENTIST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84949639765     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aac5949     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J. Marburger, Science 308, 1087 (2005).
2. A. B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, Q. J. Econ. 108, 577-598 (1993).
3. S. Kantor, A. Whalley, Rev. Econ. Stat. 96, 171-188 (2014).
4. P. Shu, "The long-term impact of business cycles on innovation: Evidence from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology" (HBS Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, 2015).
5. H. Sauermann, M. Roach, PLOS ONE 7, e36307 (2012).
6. A. J. Sumell, P. E. Stephan, J. D. Adams, in Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment, R. B. Freeman, D. L. Goroff, Eds. (Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, 2009), pp. 257-287.
7. B. Cronin, C. Sugimoto, Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope (ASIST Titles, Information Today Inc, Medford, NJ, 2014).
8. J. Lane, Nature 464, 488-489 (2010).
9. D. Sayer, "Five reasons why the REF is not fit for purpose." Guardian, 15 December 2014; www.theguardian.com/highereducation- network/2014/dec/15/research-excellenceframework- five-reasons-not-fit-for-purpose
10. J. I. Lane, J. Owen-Smith, R. F. Rosen, B. A. Weinberg, Res. Policy 44, 1659-1671 (2015).
11. B. A. Weinberg et al., Science 344, 41-43 (2014).
12. R. S. Jarmin, J. Miranda, The Longitudinal Business Database (Working Paper no. 02-17, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, 2002); https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/02-17.html.
13. S. Davis, J. Haltiwanger, R. Jarmin, C. J. Krizan, J. Miranda, A. Nucci, K. Sandusky, in Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data, T. Dunne, J. B. Jensen, M. J. Roberts, Eds. (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2009), pp. 329-368.
14. C. Syverson, J. Econ. Lit. 49, 326-365 (2011).
15. National Science Foundation Committee of Visitors, "Business R&D Innovation Survey" (NSF, Arlington, VA, 2013).
16. G. S. Becker, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2009).
17. R. Decker, J. Haltiwanger, R. Jarmin, J. Miranda, J. Econ. Perspect. 28, 3-24 (2014).
18. J. Haltiwanger, R. S. Jarmin, J. Miranda, Rev. Econ. Stat. 95, 347-361 (2013).
19. P. Stephan, in Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 7, J. Lerner, S. Stern, Eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007), pp. 71-98.
20. K. B. Whittington, J. Owen-Smith, W. W. Powell, Adm. Sci. Q. 54, 90-122 (2009).