New linked data on research investments: Scientific workforce, productivity, and public value

Research Policy

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1659-1671

  Lane, Julia I ^a,b,c   Owen Smith, Jason ^d   Rosen, Rebecca F ^a   Weinberg, Bruce A ^e  

^a AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

IRIS; Linked data; Occupation classification; Science of science policy; Scientific networks; Scientific workforce; STAR METRICS; UMETRICS

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENTS;

IRIS; LINKED DATUM; SCIENCE POLICIES; SCIENTIFIC NETWORKS; SCIENTIFIC WORKFORCE; UMETRICS;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 84947573980     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. J. Abowd, J. Haltiwanger, and J. Lane Integrated longitudinal employee-employer data for the United States Am. Econ. Rev. 94 2004 224 229
2. T. Arimoto, and Y. Sato Rebuilding public trust in science for policy-making Science 337 2012 1176 1177
3. P. Azoulay, W. Ding, and T. Stuart The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 63 2007 599 623
4. F.D. Blau, J.M. Currie, R.T.A. Croson, and D.K. Ginther Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial 2010 National Bureau of Economic Research
5. I. Cockburn, and R.M. Henderson Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery J. Ind. Econ. 46 1998 157 182
6. C. Conrad, W. Cheng, and B.A. Weinberg University Occupation Classification: Technical Paper 2014 Columbus Ohio
7. B. Cronin, and C. Sugimoto Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope 2014 Information Today Inc. /ASIS&T
8. L. Einav, and J.D. Levin The Data Revolution and Economic Analysis Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. 2013 19035 Work. Pap. Ser. No.
9. Fleming, R.L.A.D.A.Y.Y.S.L., 2011. Disambiguation and Co-authorship Networks of the U.S. Patent Inventor Database (1975-2010).
10. P. Gertler, S. Martinez, P. Premand, L. Rawlings, and C. Vermeesch Impact Evaluation in Practice 2012 The World Bank Washington, DC
11. C.L. Giles, K.D. Bollacker, and S. Lawrence CiteSeer: an automatic citation indexing system Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries 1998 pp. 89-98
12. L. Giles, and M. Khabsa The number of scholarly documents on the public web PLoS One May 9 2014
13. T.L. Griffiths, and M. Steyvers Probabilistic topic models T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, W. Kintsch, Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning 2006 Laurence Erlbaum
14. Harrison, M., 2013. Data Consistency. Washington, DC.
15. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, T. Hastie, J. Friedman, and R. Tibshirani The Elements of Statistical Learning 2009 Springer
16. T. Hey, S. Tansley, and K. Tolle The Fourth Paradigm: Data Intensive Scientific Discovery 2009 Microsoft Research
17. Husbands Fealing, K., 2015. Assessing the outputs of government funded university research: the case of food safety and security. working paper, Georgia Tech University.
18. K. Husbands Fealing, J. Lane, J. Marburger, and S. Shipp The Handbook of Science of Science Policy 2011 Stanford University Press
19. P. Jensen, and E. Webster Let's spend more wisely on research in Australia The Conversation 2014 http://theconversation.com/lets-spend-more-wisely-on-research-in-australia-29053
20. B.F. Jones The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaisance man: is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econ. Stud. 2009 283 317 No Title
21. F.W. Kabo, N. Cotton-Nessler, Y. Hwang, M.C. Levenstein, and J. Owen-Smith Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations Res. Policy 43 2014 1469 1485
22. M. Kenney, and D. Patton Guide to the Firm Database of Emerging Growth Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) from 1990 Through 2010 2013 Davis CA
23. W.R. Kerr Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion Rev. Econ. Stat. 90 2008 518 537
24. M. Khabsa, P. Treeratpitu, and L. Giles AckSeer: a repository and search engine for automatically extracted acknowledgments from digital libraries Proc. 12th ACM/IEEE-CS Jt. Conf. Digit. Libr. 2012
25. J. King, J. Lane, and L. Schwarz Creating New Administrative Data to Describe the Scientific Workforce: The Star Metrics Program 2013 SSRN eLibrary
26. J. Lane Let's make science metrics more scientific Nature 464 2010 488 489
27. J. Lane, and S. Bertuzzi Measuring the results of science investments Science 331 2011 678 680
28. Lane, J., Newman, D., Rosen, R., 2013. New Approaches To Describing Research Investments [WWW Document]. bridges. URL http://www.ostina.org/index.php?option=com-content&view=article&id=6035:new-approaches-to-describing-research-investments&catid=476:feature-articles&Itemid=3377
29. J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, and H. Nissenbaum Privacy, Big Data and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement 2014 Cambridge University Press
30. Li, G.-C., Lai R., D'Amour, A., Doolin, D.M., Sun Y., Torvik, V.I., Yu, A.Z., Fleming, L., 2014. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975-2010). Res. Policy 43, 941-955.
31. F.R. Lichtenberg The effect of pharmaceutical innovation on longevity: patient-level evidence from the 1996-2002 medical expenditure panel survey and linked mortality public-use files Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. 2012 18552 Work. Pap. Ser. No.
32. C. MacIlwain Science economics: what science is really worth Nature 465 2010 682 684 10.1038/465682a
33. J. Marburger Why policy implementation needs a science of science policy K.H. Fealing, J. Lane, S. Shipp, The Handbook of Science of Science Policy 2011 Stanford University Press
34. J.H. Marburger Wanted: better benchmarks Science 308 2005 1087
35. P. Mateos A review of name - based ethnicity classification methods and their potential in population studies Popul. Space Place 13 2007 243 263
36. P. Mateos Ethnicity, Geography and Populations: Tracing Diversity and Migration Through People's Names 2014 Springer Netherlands Berlin
37. C. Mody How probe microscopists became nanotechnologists D. Baird, A. Nordmann, J. Schummer, Discovering the Nanoscale 2004 IOS Press Amsterdam 119 133
38. B. Mole NSF cancels political-science grant cycle Nat. News 2013 10.1038/nature.2013.13501
39. L. National Academies Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States 2005 The National Academies Press
40. National Academy of Sciences Furthering America's Research Enterprise 2014 The National Academies Press Washington, DC
41. National Research Council Data on Federal Research and Development Investments: A Pathway to Modernization 2010 The National Academies Press
42. National Science and Technology Council The Science of Science Policy: A Federal Research Roadmap 2008 National Science and Technology Council, Science of Science Policy Interagency Task Group Washington, DC
43. National Science Foundation Report to the Advisory Committees of the Directorates of Computer and Information Science and Engineering and Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences 2011 National Science Foundation
44. Nelson, L., Sedwick, S.W., 2011. STAR METRICS: A Participant's Perspective. NCURA Mag. 43, 24-25.
45. M.E.J. Newman Modularity and community structure in networks Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 2006 8577 8582 10.1073/pnas.0601602103
46. Owens, B., 2013. JUDGEMENT DAY.
47. J. Owen-Smith, and W. Powell Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the boston biotechnology community Org. Sci. 15 1 2004 5 21
48. W. Powell, and E. Giannella Collective invention and inventor networks The Handbook of Innovation 2010 Elsevier Amsterdam
49. S. Shapin The Invisible Technician Am. Sci. 77 1989 554 563
50. N.R. Smalheiser, and V. Torvik Author name disambiguation Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009 1 43
51. V. Torvik, M. Weeber, D. Swanson, and N. Smalheiser A probabilistic similarity metric for Medline records: A model for author name disambiguation J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56 2005 140 158
52. H.R. Varian Big data: new tricks for econometrics J. Econ. Perspect. 28 2014 3 27
53. Ventura, S.I., Nugent, R., Fuchs, E.R.H., 2014. Seeing the non-starts: (Some) sources of bias in past dismbiguation approaches and a new public tool leveraging labeled records (No. 2,079,930).
54. D. Walsh Not Safe for Funding: The N.S.F. and The Economics of Science 2013 New Yorker
55. S. Wuchty, B.F. Jones, and B. Uzzi The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge Science 316 2007 1036 1039 10.1126/science.1136099
56. Zucker, L., Darby, M., 2006. Movement of Star Scientists and Engineers and High Tech Firm Entry No. 12,172).