Current views and practice of faculty members and consultants regarding ‘Publications in india’: A cross-sectional study

Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 794-800

  Kurdi, Madhuri S ^a   Ramaswamy, Ashwini Halebid ^a   Lokare, Laxmikant ^a   Sutagatti, Jagadish G ^a  

^a Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences   (India)

Author keywords

Attitude; Journal article; Publications; Questionnaires

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; CONSULTATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA BASE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDIA; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; SKILL; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 84949633444     PISSN: 00195049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.171567     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Medical Council of India. Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 (Amended upto August, 2012). Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/Rules-and./TEQ-REGULATIONS-06-08-12-pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Jan 23]
2. Banerjee A. The publication rat race: Who will bell the cat? Med J DY Patil Univ 2013;6:219-20. Available from: http://www.mjdrdypu.org/text.asrp?2013/6/3/219/114636. [Last accessed on 2014 Mar 14]
3. Stolerman I. Preparing manuscripts and responding to reviewers’ reports: Inside the editorial black box. In: Babor TF, Stenius K, Savva S, O’reilly J, editors. Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed. 2nd ed. Essex, United Kingdom: Multiscience Publishing Company Ltd.; 2008. p. 124-37
4. Available from: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faculty. [Last accessed on 2015 Feb 01]
5. Available from: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/consultant. [Last accessed on 2015 Feb 01]
6. Available from: http://www.sciencewatch.com/grr/india. [Last accessed on 2015 Feb 01]
7. Sukhlecha A. Research publications: Should they be mandatory for promotions of medical teachers? J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2:221-4
8. Department of Science and Technology. Bibliometric Study of India’s Scientific Publication Outputs During 2001-10: Evidence for Changing Trends. New Delhi: Government of India; July, 2012. Available from: http://www.dst.gov.in/whats_new/whats-new12/report.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 11]
9. Kotur PF. How to write a scientific article for a medical journal? Indian J Anaesth 2002;46:21-5
10. Sathe NA, Grady JL, Giuse NB. Print versus electronic journals: A preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. J Med Libr Assoc 2002;90:235-43
11. E-journals: Advantages, Disadvantages and Criteria for Selection. Available from: http://www.lisnews.org/node/1513. [Last accessed on 2015 Jan 22]
12. Chacko TV. Improving quality of medical education in India: The need to value and recognize academic scholarship. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2013;4:171-3
13. Navjyoti D, Seema V. E-journals. Problems or Panacea for higher Education? 2007. Available from: http://www.eprints.rc/is.org/13476/1/e-journals_Problems_or_Panacea_for_Higher_Education.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 14]
14. Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 2003;91:42-6.
15. Knight LV, Steinbach TA. Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: A comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a board range of academic disciplines. Int J Doctoral Stud 2008;3:59-79
16. Peh WC, Ng KH. Effective medical writing (Pointers to getting your article published): Why write? Singapore Med J 2008;49:443
17. Ware M, Monkman M. Peer Review in Scholarly Journals: Perspective of the Scholarly Community – An International Survey. A Publishing Research Consortium Report; 2008. p. 28. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/./237295758_Peer_review_in_scholarly_journals_P. [Last accessed on 2015 Jun 30]
18. Triggle CR, Triggle DJ. What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing?” Health Risk Manag 2007;3:39-53
19. Witt PA. Readership is more important than publication outlet. J Leis Res 2003;35:331-4
20. Klinger JK, Scanlon D, Pressley M. How to publish in scholarly journals. Educ Res 2005;34:14-20
21. Bjork BC, Solomon D. The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. J Inform 2013;7:914-23
22. Solomon DJ. A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals. PeerJ 2014;2:e365.
23. Schramm HL Jr, Mirand LE. Responding to peer review and editor’s comments. In: Jennings CA, Laver TA, Vondracek B, editors. Scientific Communication for Natural Resource Professionals. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society; 2012. p. 135-42
24. Woolley KL, Barron JP. Handling manuscript rejection: Insights from evidence and experience. Chest 2009;135:573-7
25. Publishing Basics for Anyone Submitting to a Scholarly Journal. Available from: http://www.connection.sagepub.com/…/9_publishing_basics_for_anyone_submitting_to_a_scholarly_journal. [Last accessed on 2015 Jan 22]
26. Harsoor SS. From the desk of the new president. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:5-6
27. Dhodi DK, Thakkar KB, Billa G, Khobragade AK, Sinha SR, Patel SB. Knowledge, attitude and practices of medical students and teachers towards clinical research in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai-a cross-sectional survey. J Contemp Med Educ 2013;1:238-44
28. Frishman WH. Student research projects and theses: Should they be a requirement for medical school graduation? Heart Dis 2001;3:140-4
29. Harsoor S, Devikarani D. Aiming for small is a crime. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:1
30. Nulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assess Eval High Educ 2008;33:301-14.