Emerging technologies-beyond the chasm: Assessing technological forecasting and its implication for innovation management in Korea

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 102, Issue , 2016, Pages 132-142

  An, Hyoung Joon ^a   Ahn, Sang Jin ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Chasm; Emerging technology; Entrepreneurship; Foresight assessment; Innovation; Technological forecasting

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; FORECASTING; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

CHASM; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; FORESIGHT ASSESSMENT; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY FORECASTING;

INNOVATION;

COMMERCIALIZATION; ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

KOREA;

EID: 84949533031     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams R., Bessant J., Phelps R. Innovation management measurement: a review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2006, 8(1):21-47.
2. Albert R., Barabasi A.L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002, 74:47-97.
3. Barabasi A.L., Jeong H., Neda Z., Ravasz E., Shubert A., Vicsek T. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Phys. A 2002, 311:590-614.
4. Böner K., Maru J.T., Goldstone R.L. The simultaneous evolution of author paper network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:5266-5273.
5. Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action 2008, Routledge, London, England.
6. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Policy 2000, 29:109-123.
7. Gartner Group Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2013 2012.
8. Hébert R.F., Link A.N. A History of Entrepreneurship 2009, Routledge, London.
9. IBM The 5 in 5 2012.
10. Kameoka A., Yokoo Y., Kuwahara T. A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2004, 71:579-598.
11. KISTEP The 10 Emerging Future Technologies 2009, (in Korean).
12. Leydesdorff L., Meyer M. Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: introduction to the special issue. Res. Policy 2006, 35:1441-1449.
13. Link A.N., Scott J.T. Government as entrepreneur: evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects. Res. Policy 2010, 39:589-601.
14. Mankins J.C. Technology Readiness Levels 1995, Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology, NASA.
15. Martino J.P. Technological Forecasting for Decision Making 1993, McGraw-Hill, Inc., US. 3rd ed.
16. Mckinsey Global Institute Disruptive Technologies 2013.
17. MIT Breakthrough technologies. MIT Tech. Rev. 2012.
18. Moore G.A. Crossing the Chasm 1999, Harper Business, New York, NY.
19. OECD Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data 2005, (www.oecd.org/sti/oslomanual). 3rd edition.
20. Öner M.A., Beşer S.G. Assessment of corporate foresight project results: case of a multinational company in Turkey. Foresight 2011, 13(2):49-63.
21. Seth A.K. Granger causality. Scholarpedia 2007, 2(7):1667.
22. STEPI Community Innovation Survey 2010, (in Korean).
23. Tao L., Probert D., Phaal R. Toward an integrated framework for managing the process of innovation. Res. Dev. Manag. 2010, 40(1):19-30.
24. Valverde S., Sole R.V., Bedau M.A., Packard N. Topology and evolution of technology innovation networks. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 76:056118.
25. Watts D.J. Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness 1999, Princeton University Press.
26. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 1998, 393:440-442.