Defining the Incremental Utility of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Standard and Specialized Read in Predicting Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer

European Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 211-213

  Tay, Kae Jack ^a   Gupta, Rajan T ^a   Brown, Alison F ^a   Silverman, Rachel K ^b   Polascik, Thomas J ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Active surveillance; Diagnostic accuracy; Extracapsular extension; Focal therapy; Likelihood; mpMRI; Nerve sparing; Prostate cancer; Sensitivity; Specificity; Utility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE CANCER EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; TUMOR INVASION; UTILIZATION;

DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84949504085     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.041     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. [1] Diefenbach, M.A., Mohamed, N.E., Regret of treatment decision and its association with disease-specific quality of life following prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Invest 25 (2007), 449–457.
2. [2] Schroeck, F.R., Krupski, T.L., Stewart, S.B., et al. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 187 (2012), 894–898.
3. [3] Gupta, R.T., Faridi, K.F., Singh, A.A., et al. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 32 (2014), 1292–1299.
4. [4] Woo, S., Cho, J.Y., Kim, S.Y., Kim, S.H., Extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with equivocal findings on T2-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204 (2015), W168–W175.
5. [5] Lotan, Y., Haddad, A.Q., Costa, D.N., Pedrosa, I., Rofsky, N.M., Roehrborn, C.G., Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy. Urol Oncol, 33, 2015 266.e9–16.
6. [6] de Rooij, M., Crienen, S., Witjes, J.A., Barentsz, J.O., Rovers, M.M., Grutters, J.P., Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective. Eur Urol 66 (2014), 430–436.
7. [7] Ruprecht, O., Weisser, P., Bodelle, B., Ackermann, H., Vogl, T.J., MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Radiol 81 (2012), 456–460.
8. [8] Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G.H., Sackett, D.L., Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271 (1994), 703–707.
9. [9] Otto, J., Thormer, G., Seiwerts, M., et al. Value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the local staging of prostate cancer. Rofo 186 (2014), 795–802.
10. [10] Latchamsetty, K.C., Borden, L.S. Jr., Porter, C.R., et al. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?. Can J Urol 14 (2007), 3429–3434.