Automotive embedded software: Migration challenges to multi-core computing platforms

Proceeding - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, INDIN 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1386-1393

  Macher, Georg ^a,b   Höller, Andrea ^a   Armengaud, Eric ^b   Kreiner, Christian ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b AVL LIST GMBH   (Austria)

Author keywords

automotive; functional safety; multi core computing platform

Indexed keywords

EMBEDDED SOFTWARE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; SURVEYS;

AUTOMOTIVE; COMPUTING PERFORMANCE; COMPUTING RESOURCE; DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS; FUNCTIONAL SAFETY; MULTI-CORE COMPUTING; MULTI-CORE PLATFORMS; PARALLEL EXECUTIONS;

LEGACY SYSTEMS;

EID: 84949501117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INDIN.2015.7281937     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. AUTOSAR development cooperation. AUTOSAR AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture, 2009.
2. AUTOSAR Development Cooperation. Guide to Multi-Core Systems. online, 2013.
3. A. Avizienis, J.-C. Laprie, and B. Randell. Dependability and its Threats-A Taxonomy. In R. Jacquart, editor, IFIP Congress Topical Sessions, pages 91-120. Kluwer, 2004.
4. V. Bendiuga. Multi-Core Pattern. Master's thesis, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering Malardalen University Sweden, December 2012.
5. K. Boehringer and M. Kroh. Funktionale Sicherheit in der Praxis, July 2013.
6. B. Brecht and S. Luys. 201121, March 2011.
7. M. Cha, S. K. Kim, and K. H. Kim. An Automatic Parallelization Scheme for Simulink-based Real-Time Multicore Systems Systems. In Software Technology, volume 5 of ASTL, pages 215-217. Sience & Engineering Research Support Society, 2012.
8. J. Circello. Rationale for Multicore Architectures in Auto Apps. Webinar, June 2011.
9. G. Fernandez, J. Abella, E. Quiñones, C. Rochange, T. Vardanega, and F. J. Cazorla. Contention in Multicore Hardware Shared Resources: Understanding of the State of the Art. In H. Falk, editor, 14th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis, volume 39 of OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs), pages 31-42, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2014. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
10. C. Ficek, N. Feiertag, and K. Richter. Applying the AUTOSAR timing protection to build safe and efficient ISO 26262 mixed-criticality systems, 2012.
11. C. Ficek, K. Richter, and N. Feiertag. Schedule Design to Guarantee Freedom of Interference in Mixed Criticality Systems. SAE Int. Journal Passeng. Cars-Electron. Electr. Syst., 5: 46-54, 04 2012.
12. M. J. Flynn. Some Computer Organizations and Their Effectiveness. IEEE Trans. Comput., 21(9): 948-960, September 1972.
13. I. Gashi, A. Povyakalo, L. Strigini, M. Matschnig, T. Hinterstoisser, and B. Fischer. Diversity for Safety and Security in Embedded Systems. In International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, volume 26, 06 2014.
14. V. Gebhardt, G. Rieger, J. Mottok, and C. Giesselbach. Funktionale Sicherheit nach ISO 262626-Ein Praxisleitfaden zur Umsetzung, volume 1. Auflage. dpunkt. verlag, 2013.
15. J. Han, J. S. Park, M. Deubzer, J. Harnisch, and P. Leteinturier. Efficient Multi-Core Software Design Space Exploration for Hybrid Control Unit Integration. In SAE Technical Paper. SAE International, 04 2014.
16. R. Hilbrich and H.-J. Goltz. Model-based Generation of Static Schedules for Safety Critical Multi-Core Systems in the Avionics Domain. In WMSE11, 2011.
17. R. Hilbrich, J. Reinier van Kampenhout, and H.-J. Goltz. Modellbasierte Generierung statischer Schedules fuer sicherheitskritische, eingebettete Systeme mit Multicore-Prozessoren und harten Echtzeitanforderungen. Informatik aktuell, pages 29-38, 2012.
18. ISO-International Organization for Standardization. IEC 61508 Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems.
19. ISO-International Organization for Standardization. ISO 26262 Road vehicles Functional Safety Part 1-10, 2011.
20. R. Jahr, M. Frieb, M. Gerdes, and T. Ungerer. Model-based Parallelization and Optimization of an Industrial Control Code. Tagungsband des Dagstuhl-Workshops, page 63, 2014.
21. R. Jahr, M. Frieb, M. Gerdes, T. Ungerer, A. Hugl, and H. Regler. Paving the Way for Multi-cores in Industrial Hard Real-time Control Applications. In 9th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES), WiP-Session, 2014.
22. R. Jahr, M. Gerdes, and T. Ungerer. On Efficient and Effective Model-based Parallelization of Hard Real-Time Applications. Dagstuhl-Workshop MBEES: Modellbasierte Entwicklung eingebetteter Systeme IX, pages 50-59, 2013.
23. S. Jena and M. Srinivas. On the Suitability of Multi-Core Processing for Embedded Automotive Systems. In Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC), 2012 International Conference on, pages 315-322, Oct 2012.
24. F. Kluge, C. Yu, J. Mische, S. Uhrig, and T. Ungerer. Implementing AUTOSAR Scheduling and Resource Management on an Embedded SMT Processor. In 12th International Workshop on Software & Compilers for Embedded Systems, pages 33-42, 2009.
25. H. Kopetz. Real-Time Systems: Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA, 1st edition, 1997.
26. H. Kopetz and G. Bauer. The Time-Triggered Architecture. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, pages 112-126, 2003.
27. E. Lalo and M. Deubzer. Effects of Task Priority Assignment in Embedded Multicore Real-Time Systems. Embedded Systems Engineering, June 2014.
28. P. Leteinturier, S. Brewerton, and K. Scheibert. MultiCore Benefits & Challenges for Automotive Applications. In SAE Technical Paper. SAE International, 04 2008.
29. C.-S. Lin, C.-H. Lu, S.-W. Lin, Y.-R. Chen, and P.-A. Hsiung. VERTAF/Multi-Core: A SysML-Based Application Framework for Multi-Core Embedded Software Development. Journal on Computer Science and Technology, 26(3): 448-462, 2011.
30. G. E. Moore. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 38(8): 114-117, April 1965.
31. B. Moyer. Real World Multicore Embedded Systems. Expert guide. Newnes, Newton, MA, USA, 1st edition, 2013.
32. F. Nemati, M. Behnam, and T. Nolte. Efficiently Migrating Real-Time Systems to Multi-Cores. In Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA 2009, September 22-25, 2008, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, pages 1-8, 2009.
33. R. Obermaisser, C. El Salloum, B. Huber, and H. Kopetz. The time-triggered System-on-a-Chip architecture. In IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2008. ISIE 2008, pages 1941-1947, 2008.
34. R. V. Patil and B. George. Tools And Techniques To Identify Concurrency Issues. online, June 2008.
35. F. Reichenbach and A. Wold. Multi-core Technology-Next Evolution Step in Safety Critical Systems for Industrial Applications? In Digital System Design: Architectures, Methods and Tools (DSD), 2010 13th Euromicro Conference on, pages 339-346, Sept 2010.
36. K. Richter and S. Schliecker. Sicher auf Multi-Core umsteigen. HANSER automotive, 10: 38-42, 10 2013.
37. SafEUr Training Material Committee. ECQA Certified Functional Safety Manager Training Material. Training dossier, April 2013.
38. K. Scheidemann, M. Knapp, and C. Stellwag. Load Balancing in AUTOSAR-Multicore-Systemen. WEKA Fachmedien GmbH, April 2010.
39. D. Schneider, E. Armengaud, and E. Schoitsch. Towards Trust Assurance and Certification in Cyber-Physical Systems. In SAFECOMP Workshops, pages 180-191, 2011.
40. G. Scuro. Automotive industry: Innovation driven by electronics. http://embedded-computing. com/articles/automotive-industryinnovation-driven-electronics/, 2012.
41. A. S. Tanenbaum. Modern Operating Systems. Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2007.
42. R. Zalman, A. Griessing, and P. Emberson. Timing Correctness in Safety-Related Automotive Software. In SAE Technical Paper. SAE International, 04 2011.
43. T. Zurawka and J. Schaeuffele. Method for checking the safety and reliability of a software-based electronic system, January 2007.