Genomics in Conservation: Case Studies and Bridging the Gap between Data and Application

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 81-83

  Garner, Brittany A ^a,b   Hand, Brian K ^a   Amish, Stephen J ^a,b   Bernatchez, Louis ^c   Foster, Jeffrey T ^d   Miller, Kristina M ^e   Morin, Phillip A ^f   Narum, Shawn R ^g   O'Brien, Stephen J ^h   Roffler, Gretchen ⁱ   Templin, William D ^j   Sunnucks, Paul ^k   Strait, Jeffrey ^a,b   Warheit, Kenneth I ^l   Seamons, Todd R ^l   Wenburg, John ^m   Olsen, Jeffrey ^m   Luikart, Gordon ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^e PACIFIC BIOLOGICAL STATION   (Canada)

^f NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^g St Petersburg State University ^*  (United States)

^h ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

ⁱ ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^j Gene Conservation Laboratory   (United States)

^k MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^l WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^m NONE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Conservation biology; Conservation genomics; Conservation practice; Genetic monitoring; Natural resource management; Next generation sequencing; Population genomics

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GENOMICS;

EID: 84949426402     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.10.009     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Shafer A.B.A., et al. Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30:78-87.
2. Allendorf F.W., et al. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:697-709.
3. Steane D.A., et al. Genome-wide scans reveal cryptic population structure in a dry-adapted eucalypt. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11:33.
4. Warheit K.I. Measuring Reproductive Interaction between Hatchery-Origin and Wild Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from Northern Puget Sound Populations Potentially Affected by Segregated Hatchery Programs 2014, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
5. Steele C.A., et al. A validation of parentage-based tagging using hatchery steelhead in the Snake River basin. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2013, 70:1046-1054.
6. Narum S.R., et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing in ecological and conservation genomics. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:2841-2847.
7. Campbell N.R., et al. Genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing (GT-seq): a cost effective SNP genotyping method based on custom amplicon sequencing. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2014, 15:855-867.
8. Hess J.E., et al. Use of genotyping by sequencing data to develop a high-throughput and multifunctional SNP panel for conservation applications in Pacific lamprey. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2015, 15:187-202.
9. Miller W., et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered marsupial Sarcophilus harrisii (Tasmanian devil). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:12348-12353.
10. Lemmon A.R., et al. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:727-744.
11. Gustafson R., et al. Pacific Salmon Extinctions: Quantifying Lost and Remaining Diversity. Paper 438 2007, US Department of Commerce.
12. Habicht C., et al. Harvest and Harvest Rates of Sockeye Salmon Stocks in Fisheries of the Western Alaska Salmon Stock Identification Program (WASSIP), 2006-2008. Special Publication No. 12-24 2012, Alaska Department of Fish and Game.