Erratum: Improving Collective Estimations Using Resistance to Social Influence (PLoS Comput Biol (2015) 11:11 (e1004594) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004594);Improving Collective Estimations Using Resistance to Social Influence

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Madirolas, Gabriel ^a,b   de Polavieja, Gonzalo G ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO CAJAL   (Spain)

^b CHAMPALIMAUD CENTRE FOR THE UNKNOWN   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

GEOMETRIC MEAN; HISTORICAL DATA; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; LARGE DEVIATIONS; MENTAL CALCULATIONS; PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; STATISTIC MODELING;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXTRACT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; PREDICTION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN RELATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84949231338     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1004713     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Galton F, (1907) Vox populi. Nature 75, 450–451.
2. Surowiecki J, (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds. Random House LLC.
3. Page SE, (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press.
4. Lee MD, Shi J (2010) The accuracy of small-group estimation and the wisdom of crowds. Proc. 32nd Annu. Conf. Cognit. Sci. Soc. 1124–1129.
5. Wagner C, Vinaimont T, (2010) Evaluating the wisdom of crowds. Proc. Issues Inf. Syst. 11(1), 724–732.
6. Easley D, Kleinberg J, (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Cambridge University Press.
7. Krause J, Ruxton GD, Krause S, (2010) Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 25(1), 28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.016 19735961
8. King AJ, Cheng L, Starke SD, Myatt JP, (2012) Is the true ‘wisdom of the crowd’ to copy successful individuals? Biol. Lett. 8(2), 197–200. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0795 21920956
9. Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Schweitzer F, Helbing D, (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(22), 9020–9025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008636108 21576485
10. Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E, (2004) Prediction markets. NBER Work. Pap.-Nat. Bur. w10504.
11. Whitehill J, Wu TF, Bergsma J, Movellan JR, Ruvolo PL, (2009) Whose vote should count more: Optimal integration of labels from labelers of unknown expertise. Adv. Neur. In. 2035–2043.
12. Lee MD, Steyvers M, De Young M, Miller B, (2012) Inferring expertise in knowledge and prediction ranking tasks. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 151–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01175.x 22253187
13. Mavrodiev P, Tessone CJ, Schweitzer F, (2013) Quantifying the effects of social influence. Sci. Rep. 3.
14. Pérez-Escudero A, de Polavieja GG, (2011) Collective animal behavior from Bayesian estimation and probability matching. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(11), e1002282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002282 22125487
15. Arganda S, Pérez-Escudero A, de Polavieja GG, (2012) A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(50), 20508–20513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210664109 23197836
16. Dehaene S, (2003) The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 7(4), 145–147. 12691758
17. Longo MR, Lourenco SF, (2007) Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia 45(7), 1400–1407. 17157335
18. Petzschner FH, Glasauer S, (2011) Iterative Bayesian estimation as an explanation for range and regression effects: a study on human path integration. J. Neurosci. 31(47), 17220–17229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2028-11.2011 22114288
19. Parkin TB, Robinson JA, (1993) Statistical evaluation of median estimators for lognormally distributed variables. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57(2), 317–323.
20. Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M, (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience 51(5), 341–352.
21. Kruschke JK, (2013) Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(2), 573. doi: 10.1037/a0029146 22774788
22. DeGroot MH, (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121.
23. Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC, (1990) Social influence and opinions. J. Math. Sociol. 15(3–4), 193–206.
24. Moussaïd M, Kämmer JE, Analytis PP, Neth H, (2013) Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PloS One 8(11), e78433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078433 24223805
25. Silverman BW, (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. 26, 45, 76, 86–87. CRC Press.
26. Peel D, MacLahlan G, (2000) Finite Mixture Models. John Wiley & Sons.
27. Ribeiro MI, (2004) Gaussian probability density functions: Properties and error characterization. Institute for Systems and Robotics, Lisboa, Portugal. Available: http://hans.fugal.net/comps/papers/ribeiro_2004.pdf
28. Sniezek JA, Henry RA, (1989) Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 43(1), 1–28.
29. Bahrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, Roepstorff A, Rees G, Frith CD, (2010) Optimally interacting minds. Science 329(5995), 1081–1085. doi: 10.1126/science.1185718 20798320
30. Koriat A, (2012) When are two heads better than one and why? Science 336(6079), 360–362. doi: 10.1126/science.1216549 22517862
31. Mahmoodi A, Bang D, Ahmadabadi MN, Bahrami B, (2013) Learning to make collective decisions: the impact of confidence escalation. PloS One 8(12), e81195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081195 24324677