Erratum: A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2012) 109 (20508-20513) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210664109);A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 50, 2012, Pages 20508-20513

  Arganda, Sara ^a,b   Pérez Escudero, Alfonso ^a   De Polavieja, Gonzalo G ^a  

^a INSTITUTO CAJAL   (Spain)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Collective behavior; Probability matching; Public information

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DECISION MAKING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STICKLEBACK; ZEBRA FISH;

EID: 84870938091     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222108110     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27(12):712-719. (Pubitemid 39488074)
2. Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:535-574. (Pubitemid 47218767)
3. Tenenbaum JB, Kemp C, Griffiths TL, Goodman ND (2011) How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 331(6022):1279-1285.
4. Biernaskie JM, Walker SC, Gegear RJ (2009) Bumblebees learn to forage like Bayesians. Am Nat 174(3):413-423.
5. McNamara JM, Green RF, Olsson O (2006) Bayes theorem and its applications in animal behaviour. Oikos 112(2):243-251.
6. Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Q J Econ 107(3):797-817.
7. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J Polit Econ 100(5):992-1026.
8. Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Public information for the assessment of quality: A widespread social phenomenon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357(1427):1549-1557. (Pubitemid 35442099)
9. Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357(1427):1559-1566. (Pubitemid 35442100)
10. Wagner RH, Danchin E (2010) A taxonomy of biological information. Oikos 119(2):203-209.
11. Clark C, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Popul Biol 30(1):45-75.
12. Coolen I, van Bergen Y, Day RL, Laland KN (2003) Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks. Proc Biol Sci 270(1531):2413-2419. (Pubitemid 37464027)
13. van Bergen Y, Coolen I, Laland KN (2004) Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc Biol Sci 271(1542):957-962. (Pubitemid 38586418)
14. Rieucau G, Giraldeau LA (2009) Persuasive companions can be wrong: The use of misleading social information in nutmeg mannikins. Behav Ecol 20(6):1217-1222.
15. Lima SL (1995) Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: Fraught with ambiguity? Anim Behav 50(4):1097-1108.
16. Nordell SE, Valone TJ (1998) Mate choice copying as public information. Ecol Lett 1(2):74-76. (Pubitemid 128505221)
17. Magurran AE, Higham A (2010) Information transfer across fish shoals under predation threat. Ethology 78(2):153-158.
18. Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305(5683):487-491. (Pubitemid 38971332)
19. Dall SRX, Giraldeau LA, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20(4):187-193. (Pubitemid 40359265)
20. Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: Females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139(6):1384-1389.
21. Ward AJW, Herbert-Read JE, Sumpter DJT, Krause J (2011) Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(6):2312-2315.
22. Pérez-Escudero A, de Polavieja GG (2011) Collective animal behavior from Bayesian estimation and probability matching. PLOS Comput Biol 7(11):e1002282.
23. Gómez-Laplaza LM, Gerlai R (2011) Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber's law. Anim Cogn 14(1):1-9.
24. Perna A, et al. (2012) Individual rules for trail pattern formation in Argentine ants (Linepithema humile). PLOS Comput Biol 8(7):e1002592.
25. Ward AJW, Sumpter DJT, Couzin ID, Hart PJB, Krause J (2008) Quorum decisionmaking facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(19):6948-6953. (Pubitemid 351754510)
26. Sumpter DJT, Krause J, James R, Couzin ID, Ward AJW (2008) Consensus decision making by fish. Curr Biol 18(22):1773-1777.
27. Goss S, Aron S, Deneubourg JL, Pastels JM (1989) Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant. Naturwissenschaften 76(12):579-581. (Pubitemid 20073252)
28. Deneubourg J, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels J (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant. J Insect Behav 3(2):159-168.
29. Meunier H, Leca JB, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2006) Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: The utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours. Behaviour 143(12):1511-1527. (Pubitemid 46122089)
30. Tero A, Kobayashi R, Nakagaki T (2007) A mathematical model for adaptive transport network in path finding by true slime mold. J Theor Biol 244(4):553-564. (Pubitemid 46148964)
31. Gallup AC, et al. (2012) Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(19):7245-7250.
32. Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC (2009) Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1518):743-753.
33. Jeanson R, et al. (2005) Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Anim Behav 69(1):169-180. (Pubitemid 40033323)
34. Bousquet CAH, Sumpter DJT, Manser MB (2011) Moving calls: A vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278(1711):1482-1488.
35. Behrend ER, Bitterman ME (1961) Probability-matching in the fish. Am J Psychol 74(4):542-551.
36. Greggers U, Menzel R (1993) Memory dynamics and foraging strategies of honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32(1):17-29. (Pubitemid 24406710)
37. Kirk KL, Bitterman ME (1965) Probability-learning by the turtle. Science 148(3676):1484-1485.
38. Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L (2010) Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception. PLOS Comput Biol 6(8):7.
39. Fretwell S, Lucas H (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19(1):16-36.
40. Houston A, McNamara J (1987) Switching between resources and the ideal free distribution. Anim Behav 35(1):301-302.
41. Vulkan N (2000) An economist's perspective on probability matching. J Econ Surv 14(1):101-118.
42. Staddon J (1983) Adaptive Behavior and Learning (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
43. Gaissmaier W, Schooler LJ (2008) The smart potential behind probability matching. Cognition 109(3):416-422.
44. Green CS, Benson C, Kersten D, Schrater P (2010) Alterations in choice behavior by manipulations of world model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(37):16401-16406.
45. Engeszer RE, Ryan MJ, Parichy DM (2004) Learned social preference in zebrafish. Curr Biol 14(10):881-884. (Pubitemid 38800909)
46. Wright D, Krause J (2006) Repeated measures of shoaling tendency in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and other small teleost fishes. Nat Protoc 1(4):1828-1831. (Pubitemid 46773302)
47. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 8(7):307-314. (Pubitemid 38887447)
48. Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke E, Pica P (2008) Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320(5880):1217-1220. (Pubitemid 351929510)