Transplant size affects early growth of a Pinus taeda clone

Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 39-48

  South, David B ^a   Lyons, Al ^b   Pohl, Russ ^c  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Hancock Forest Management   (United States)

^c Georgia Forestry Commission   (United States)

Author keywords

Atrazine; Chloropicrin; Clone; Esfenvalerate; Methyl bromide; Metsulfuron methyl; Nursery; Oxyfluorfen; Permethrin; Plantation; Sethoxydim; Stock quality; Sulfometuron; Survival; Triadimefon

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; HERBICIDES; TISSUE CULTURE;

CHLOROPICRIN; ESFENVALERATE; METHYL BROMIDE; METSULFURON METHYL; NURSERY; OXYFLUORFEN; PERMETHRIN; PLANTATION; SETHOXYDIM; SULFOMETURON; SURVIVAL; TRIADIMEFON;

CLONING;

CLONE; CONIFEROUS TREE; GROWTH; HEIGHT; SIZE EFFECT; TRANSPLANTATION;

ALABAMA; GEORGIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84949189939     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19467664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wakeley, P.C. 1949. Physiological grades of southern pine nursery stock. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Foresters; 1949: Bethesda, Maryland: Society of American Foresters. 311-322 p.
2. South, D.B., J.N. Boyer, and L. Bosch. 1985. Survival and growth of loblolly pine as in uenced by seedling grade: 13-year results. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 9:76-81.
3. Mason, E.G., D.B. South, and Z. Weizhong. 1996. Performance of Pinus radiata in relation to seedling grade, weed control, and soil cultivation in the central North Island of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science. 26(1/2):173-183.
4. South, D.B. 1993. Rationale for growing southern pine seedlings at low seedbed densities. New Forests. 7(1):63-92.
5. Mason, E.G. 2001. A model of the juvenile growth and survival of Pinus radiata D.Don; adding the effects of initial seedling diameter and plant handling. New Forests. 22(1/2):133-158.
6. Payandeh, B. 1996. Growth and survival functions for three planted species in Northern Ontario. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 13(1):19-23.
7. VanderSchaaf, C.L., and D.B. South. 2008. RCD-lob: A growth and yield model for loblolly pine that incorporates root-collar diameter at time-of-planting. Americas Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology. 2(1):5-11.
8. South, D.B. 2001. Three plantation establishment models for pine. New Zealand Journal of Forestry. 45(4):10-13.
9. Grossnickle, S.C., and J. Pait. 2008. Somatic embryogenesis tissue culture for applying varietal forestry to conifer species. In: Dumroese, R.K., Riley, L.E., Eds. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations; 2007: Fort Collins, Colorado: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings. 135-139 p.
10. Roberts, S.D., R.J. Rousseau, and B.L. Herrin. 2013. Assessing potential genetic gains from varietal planting stock in loblolly pine plantations. In: Guldin JM, Ed. Proceedings of the 15th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference; 2008: Hot Springs, Arkansas: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-175. 241-245 p.
11. Dougherty, D., M. Kane, R. Teskey, R. Daniels, and J. Wright. 2012. Characterization of yields for Pinus taeda genotypes at the half-sib, full-sib, and varietal levels of genetic improvement at two planting densities at age 5 in the Upper Coastal Plain of Georgia. In: Butnor, J.R., Ed. Proceedings of the 16th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference; 2011: Charlestown, South Carolina: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-156. 98-99 p.
12. Pinto, J.R., R.K. Dumroese, A.S. Davis, and T.D. Landis. 2011. Conducting seedling stocktype trials: a new approach to an old question. Journal of Forestry. 109(5):293-299.
13. Van Deusen, P.C., A.D. Sullivan, and T.G. Matney. 1981. A prediction system for cubic foot volume of loblolly pine applicable through much of its range. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 5(4):186{189.
14. SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., United States.
15. South, D.B., and J.B. Zwolinski. 1997. Transplant stress index: a proposed method of quantifying planting check. New Forests. 13(1/3):315-328.
16. South, D.B., M.I. Menzies, and D.G. Holden. 2005. Stock size affects outplanting survival and early growth of fascicle cuttings of Pinus radiata. New Forests. 29(3):273-288.
17. Perry, T.O., and G.W. Baldwin. 1966. Winter breakdown of the photosynthetic apparatus of evergreen species. Forest Science. 12(3):298-300.
18. South, D.B., D.G.M. Donald, and J.L. Rakestraw. 1993. Effect of nursery culture and bud status on freeze injury to Pinus taeda and P. elliottii seedlings. South African Forestry Journal. 166:37-45.
19. South, D.B., J.L. Rakestraw, and G.A. Lowerts. 2001. Early gains from planting large-diameter seedlings and intensive management are additive for loblolly pine. New Forests. 22(1/2):97-110.
20. South, D.B. 1991. Testing the hypothesis that mean relative growth rates eliminate size-related growth differences in tree seedlings. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science. 21(2/3):144-164.
21. South, D.B., and C.L. VanderSchaaf. 2006. The statistical reason why some researchers say some silvi-cultural treatments "wash-out" over time. In: Connor, K.F., Ed. Proceedings of the 13th biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 2005: Memphis, Tennessee: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-92. 333-337 p.
22. South, D.B., and J.H. Miller. 2007. Growth response analysis after early control of woody competition for 14 loblolly pine plantations in the southern US. Forest Ecology and Management. 242(2):569-577.
23. Frampton, J., B. Li, and B. Goldfarb. 2000. Early field growth of loblolly pine rooted cuttings and seedlings. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 24(2):98-105.
24. Zeide, B. 1993. Analysis of growth equations. Forest Science. 39(3):594-616.
25. Sharma, R.K., E.G. Mason, and C.T. Sorensson. 2007. Impact of planting stock quality on initial growth and survival of radiata pine clones and modeling initial growth and survival. New Zealand Journal of Forestry. 52(1):14-23.
26. Steiger, J.J. 2013. Impacts of different levels of genetic homogeneity on juvenile stem characteristics and potential stand-level value in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Thesis, North Carolina State University. Available from: http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ ir/bitstream/1840.16/8525/1/etd.pdf
27. Sharma, R.K., E.G. Mason, and C.T. Sorensson. 2008. Productivity of radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don.) clones in monoclonal and clonal mixture plots at age 12 years. Forest Ecology and Management. 255(1):140-148.
28. Purvis, S.J. 2009. Impacts of silvicultural practices on within-stand variability of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations. Thesis, University of Georgia. Available from: https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/ purvis stephen j 200908 ms.pdf
29. Nance, W.L., and C.F. Bey. 1979. Incorporating genetic information in growth and yield models. In: Proceedings of the 15th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference; 1979: Mississippi State University, MS.140-148 p.
30. Blake, J.I., L.D. Teeter, and D.B. South. 1989. Analysis of the economic benefits from increasing uniformity in Douglas fir nursery stock. Forestry. 62 (Suppl):251-262.
31. Cannell, M.G.R. 1989. Uniform nursery stock and plantation development. Forestry. 62 (Suppl):263-273.
32. South, D.B., R. Johnson, M. Hainds, and C.L. VanderSchaaf. 2011. Realized gains from planting Pinus taeda in 6.1 meter rows in Alabama. Open Forest Science Journal. 4:71-77.