Corrigendum to "Growth response analysis after early control of woody competition for 14 loblolly pine plantations in the southern U.S." [Forest Ecol. Manage. 242 (2007) 569-577] (DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.070);Growth response analysis after early control of woody competition for 14 loblolly pine plantations in the southern U.S.

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 242, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 569-577

  South, David B ^a   Miller, James H ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Age shift; Hardwoods; Herbicides; Pinus taeda; Weed control

Indexed keywords

HARDWOODS; HERBICIDES; WEED CONTROL;

AGE SHIFT; GROWTH RESPONSE; PINE PLANTATIONS; PINE VOLUME GAINS;

SOFTWOODS;

CONIFEROUS FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH RESPONSE; HERBICIDE; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; PLANTATION FORESTRY; WEED CONTROL; WOODY PLANT;

HARDWOODS; HERBICIDES; PINUS TAEDA; WEED CONTROL;

LOUISIANA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 34047184708     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.023     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Bendtsen, B.A., Ethington, R.L., 1975. Mechanical properties of 23 species of eastern hardwoods. USDA. For. Serv. Res. Note FPL-0230, p. 12.
2. Buford M.A. Height-diameter relationships at age 15 in loblolly pine seed sources. For. Sci. 32 (1986) 812-818
3. Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L., Westfall J.A., and Daniels R.F. PTAEDA3: Simulation of Individual Tree Growth, Stand Development and Economic Evaluation in Loblolly Pine Plantations (2003), Department of Forestry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA p. 23
4. Clark III A., Daniels R.F., and Miller J.H. Effect of controlling herbaceous and woody competing vegetation on wood quality of planted loblolly pine. For. Products J. 56 (2006) 40-46
5. Clark III, A., Phillips, D.R., Frederick, D.J., 1986. Weight, volume, and physical properties of major hardwood species in the Upland-South. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-257, p. 61.
6. Kyle K.H., Andrews L.J., Fox T.R., Aust W.M., Burger J.A., and Hansen G.H. Long-term effects of drainage, bedding, and fertilization on growth of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the Coastal Plain of Virginia. South. J. Appl. For. 29 (2005) 205-214
7. Mason E.G., and Milne P.G. Effects of weed control, fertilization, and soil cultivation on the growth of Pinus radiata at midrotation in Canterbury, New Zealand. Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 985-992
8. Mead D.J., and Gadgil R.L. Fertiliser use in established radiata pine stands in New Zealand. NZ J. For. Sci. 8 (1978) 105-134
9. Miller J.H., Zutter B.R., Zedaker S.M., Edwards M.B., Haywood J.D., and Newbold R.A. A regional study on the influence of woody and herbaceous competition on early loblolly pine growth. South. J. Appl. For. 15 (1991) 169-179
10. Miller, J.H., Zutter, B.R., Zedaker, S.M., Edwards, M.B., Newbold, R.A., 1995. A regional framework of early growth response for loblolly pine relative to herbaceous, woody, and complete competition control: the COMProject. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-117, p. 48.
11. Miller J.H., Zutter B.R., Zedaker S.M., Edwards M.B., and Newbold R.A. Stand dynamics and plant associates of loblolly pine plantations to midrotation after early intensive vegetation management-a southeastern United States Regional Study. South. J. Appl. For. 27 (2003) 221-236
12. Miller J.H., Zutter B.R., Zedaker S.M., Edwards M.B., and Newbold R.A. Growth and yield relative to competition for loblolly pine plantations to midrotation-a southeastern United States Regional Study. South. J. Appl. For. 27 (2003) 237-252
13. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5th ed. (2001), Wiley, New York
14. Neter J., and Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs (1974), Richard D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL
15. Richardson B. Vegetation management practices in plantation forests of Australia and New Zealand. Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1989-2005
16. Shiver B.D., and Martin S.W. Twelve-year results of loblolly site preparation study in the Piedmont and Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama. South. J. Appl. For. 26 (2002) 32-36
17. Smith W.D., and Hafley W.L. Simulating the effect of hardwood encroachment on loblolly pine plantations. In: Phillips D.R. (Ed). Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, USDA For. Serv. GTR SE-42 (1987) 180-186
18. Snowdon P. Modeling Type 1 and Type 2 growth responses in plantations after application of fertilizer or other silvicultural treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 163 (2002) 229-244
19. Snowdon, P., Khanna, P.K., 1989. Nature of growth responses in long-term field experiments with special reference to Pinus radiata. In: Dyck, W.J., Mees, C.A. (Eds.), Research strategies for long-term site productivity. IEA/BE A3 Workshop, Seattle. IEA/BE A3 Report 8, For. Res. Inst., New Zealand. Bulletin 152, pp. 173-186.
20. Snowdon P., and Waring H.D. Long-term nature of growth responses obtained to fertiliser and weed control applied at planting and their consequences for forest management. Proceedings of the IUFRO Symposium on Site and Site Productivity of Fast Growing Plantations. Pretoria and Petermaritzberg, South Africa (1984) 701-711
21. South D.B. Rationale for growing southern pine seedlings at low seedbed densities. New For. 7 (1993) 63-92
22. South D.B., and Rakestraw J.L. A loblolly pine seedling-grade by genotype study. South. J. Appl. For. 26 (2002) 153-158
23. South D.B., Miller J.H., Kimberly M.O., and Vanderschaaf C.L. Determining productivity gains from herbaceous vegetation management with 'age-shift' calculations. Forestry 79 (2006) 43-56
24. Tasissa G., Burkhart H.E., and Amateis R.L. Volume and taper equations for thinned and unthinned loblolly pine trees in cutover, site-prepared plantations. South. J. Appl. For. 21 (1997) 146-152
25. VanderSchaaf C.L., and South D.B. Early growth response of slash pine to double-bedding on a flatwoods site in Georgia. In: Connor K.F. (Ed). Proceedings of the Twelfth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, USDA For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-71 (2004) 363-367