An "Eye" for an "I": The challenges and opportunities for spotting credibility in a digital world

Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment

Volumn 9781461455479, Issue , 2013, Pages 325-340

  Hancock, Jeff ^a   Woodworth, Michael ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949179378     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Arciuli, J., Mallard, D., & Villar, G. (2010). "Um, I can tell you're lying": Linguistic markers of deception versus truth telling in speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 397-411.
2. Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S.D. (2010). Facebook pro files re flect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372-374.
3. Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412-414.
4. Black, P. J., Woodworth, M., & Porter, S. (in preparation). The in fluence of the dark triad on the ability to detect vulnerability in others.
5. Boltz, M. G., Dyer, R. L., & Miller, A. R. (2010). Are you lying to me? Temporal cues for deception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 458-466.
6. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
7. Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (2005). Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classi fication of prisoners' truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 313-329.
8. Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation, and emotion. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 54-59.
9. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chamelion effect: The perception-behavior link social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
10. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
11. DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Kashy, D. A., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
12. DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replication and extension. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.
13. Duran, N. D., Hall, C., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). The linguistic correlates of conversational deception: Comparing natural language processing technologies. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 31, 439-462.
14. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Developmental Psychology, 34, 299-309.
15. Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, NY: Norton & Company, Inc.
16. Gordon, A. K., & Miller, A. G. (2000). Perspective differences in the construal of lies: Is deception in the eye of the beholder? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 46-55.
17. Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245-256.
18. Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 447-463.
19. Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital deception: When, where and how people lie online. In K. McKenna, T. Postmes, U. Reips, & A. N. Joinson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 287-301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Hancock, J. T., Curry, L., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. T. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23.
21. Hancock, J.T. & Gonzales, A. (in press) To lie or not to lie online: The pragmatics of deception in computer-mediated communication. In S. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.) Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Hancock, J. T., Woodworth, M. T., & Goorha, S. (2010). See no evil: The effect of communication medium and motivation on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 327-343.
23. Hancock, J. T., Woodworth, M., & Porter, S. (2011). Hungry like the wolf: A word pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi:10.1111/ j.2044-8333.2011.02025.x.
24. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111-120.
25. Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
26. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. In Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http:// www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adult.
27. Liu, X., Hancock, J. T., Zhang, G., Xu, R., Markowitz, D., & Bazarova, N. (2012). Exploring linguistic features for deception detection in unstructured text. Presentation at the Proceedings of the International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA
28. Logsdon, J. N., & Patterson, K. D. W. (2009). Deception in business networks: Is it easier to lie online? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 537-549.
29. Markowitz, D., Hancock, J. T., & Bazarova, N. (2011). The language of presidential lies: How words can re flect lies about war, personal scandal and state secrets. Presentation at the 97th Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
30. Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675.
31. Oberlander, J., & Gill, A. J. (2006). Language with character: A strati fied corpus comparison of individual differences in e-mail communication. Discourse Process, 42, 239-270.
32. Ott, M., Cardie, C., Choi, Y., & Hancock, J.T. (2011). Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2011), 309-319.
33. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.
34. Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
35. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577.
36. Perloff, R. (2002). The third person effect. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 489-505). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Porter, S., & Woodworth, M. (2007). "I'm sorry I did it ... but he started it": A comparison of the of ficial and self-reported homicide descriptions of psychopaths and non-psychopaths. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 91-107.
38. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole of ficers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643-658.
39. Saxe, L. (1991). Lying: Thoughts of an applied social psychologist. American Psychologist, 46, 409-415.
40. Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54.
41. Toma, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating pro files. Journal of Communication, 62, 78-97.
42. Toma, C., Jiang, C., & Hancock, J. T. (under review). The deception-media double standard: Self-other asymmetry in beliefs about deception across media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking.
43. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
44. Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239-263.
45. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
46. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Warkentin, D., Woodworth, M., Hancock, J.T., & Cormier, N. (2010). Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer- Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW2012), 9-12.
48. Wheeler, S., Book, A., & Costello, K. (2009). Psychopathic traits and perceptions of victim vulnerability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 635-648.
49. Woodworth, M., Hancock, J., Agar, A., Cormier, N., & Carpenter, T. (2010). Suspicion in synchronous computer-mediated communication: Preliminary results. Presentation at the Proceedings of the International Conference on System Science, Hawaii, USA.
50. Woodworth, M., & Waschbusch, D. (2008). Emotional processing in children with conduct problems and callous/unemotional traits. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34, 234-244.