Overlapping mental representations of self and group: Evidence and implications

Taylor and Francis Ltd 5

Volumn 9781315800516, Issue , 2014, Pages 21-35

  Smith, Eliot R ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949176754     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315800516     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.Jourmz of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
3. Aron, A., & Fraley, B. (1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140-160.
4. Barsalou, L. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 101-140).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bowlby J. (1982). Attachant andloss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed). New York: Basic Books.
6. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without, reason. MIT Al Lab Memo 1293.
7. Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathew, A., Wade, C, & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
8. Cadinu, M. R., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-677.
9. Caporael, L. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 276-298.
10. Caporael, L. R., & Baron, R. M. (1997). Groups as the minds natural environment. In J. Simpson & D. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 317-343). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thome, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
12. Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines: Con-nectionism, concepts, and representational change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Coats, S., Smith, E. R„ Claypool, H„ & Banner, M (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Response time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 302-315.
14. Elman, J. L„ Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Pluiikett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Foerster, J„ Higgins, E. T., & Strack, F (2000). When stereotype disconfirmation is a personal threat: How prejudice and prevention focus moderate incongmency effects. Social Cognition, 18, 178-197.
16. Higgins, E. T (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York: Academic Press.
17. Jackson, J. W, & Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120-135.
18. Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). Evolution, pair-bonding, and reproductive strategies: A recon-ceptualization of adult attachment. In J. A. Simpson & W. F. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory anddose relationships (pp. 353-393). New York: Guilford.
19. Kmeger, J., & Clement, R. W (1997). Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: The case for social projection.
20. Kunda, Z„ Miller, D. T, & Claire, T. (1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14,551-577.
21. Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
22. Loftus, E. F (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Inter-group relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105, 499-529.
24. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
25. McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (Eds). (1998). Connections models of social reasoning and social behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341-357.
28. Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L„ & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the. microstmcture. of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C, & Higgins, E. T. (in press). Considering the regulatory focus of intergroup bias. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Fromprejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
30. Shultz, T. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review, 103,219-240.
31. Simpson, J. A., & Kenrick, D. T. (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each otherJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.
33. Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Smith, E. R„ Coats, S., & Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 873-882.
35. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (1998). Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: Simulation with a recurrent connectionist net-work. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 21-35.
36. Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becon.es part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.
37. Smith, E. R., Murphy, J., & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measure-ment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.
38. Smith, E. R, & Semin, G. R. (2000). The foundations of socially situated action: Socially situated cognition. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
39. Spears, R„ Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
40. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental socialpsychology, Vol. 21: Social psychological studies of. the self: Perspectives and programs (pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41. Turner, J. C, Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D, & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
42. Turner, J. C, Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20,454-463.
43. Yeh, W, & Barsalou, L. W. (2000). The situated nature of concepts. Unpublished manuscript, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.